WEEDSPORT - An attempted dive made by the Weedsport Central School District to not re-appoint a long-time swimming and diving coach appeared as a belly flop for nearly 30 students, graduates and adults.
Jill Connor / The Citizen
Gary Earl, the former swimming and diving coach for Weedsport Central Schools, contradicts the reasons he was not recommended his job for the 2009-10 school year at a Weedsport school district board of education meeting on Monday. Behind him, numerous parents, and former and current athletes attended the meeting and speak on his behalf.
Gary Earl, the former swimming and diving coach for Weedsport Central Schools, contradicts the reasons he was not recommended his job for the 2009-10 school year at a Weedsport school district board of education meeting on Monday. Behind him, numerous parents, and former and current athletes attended the meeting and speak on his behalf.
There were more people than chairs at the board of education meeting Monday, during which nearly half of attendees spoke in defense of varsity swimming and diving coach Gary Earl, who was told last week he was not going to be reappointed for his 13th season with the district.
Jeremy Ozolins said he had virtually no swimming skill when he joined the swim team, but within one year he made it to sectionals. Now, the 19-year-old Weedsport graduate is on the swim team at Clarkson College.
“The only reason why I'm on that team,” he said, “is because of Gary Earl.”
Earl said he was notified last Thursday of the district's decision not to rehire him for another year. Coaching appointments are made annually.
“It was a total surprise,” he said. “When you put this much time and energy into a program, it kind of floored me.”
As the second speaker of the night, Earl spoke directly to the three reasons given to him as to why he was not reappointed. He said he was told that he was not encouraging enough, a point he refuted.
He said he was told that the number of students interested is too few, a point he attributed to declining enrollment trends.
And he was told that he should have bestowed the two swimming scholarships upon two of this year's graduating seniors. In response, he said the three seniors on the team last year had more absences than the entire team combined. He asked fellow coaches for advice, and he said the response was to not give them out if the students had not met the criteria.
The discussion of the athletic scholarships resurfaced later on in the meeting, when board member Timothy Lally commented on the procedure for identifying the persons for awards. Reviewing the newly revised coaching handbook, Lally said the procedure by which coaches can decide who to give scholarships to is vague, allowing for a situation like that involving Earl.
He asked for - and board members agreed - to add a sentence allowing scholarship recommendations to be communicated to the awards committee, primarily comprised of teachers, to prevent any “controversial” decisions from taking place.
For nearly an hour, athletes, graduates and parents of athletes appealed to the board to reconsider its decision in not re-appointing Earl.
“When you are all done,” Board President Norm Chirco said, “we'll take what you say into consideration. We're anxious to hear what you have to say.”
In other news
* Weedsport will have a new food provider for at least one year.
The board unanimously appointed Advance Meal as the district's food management company for a one year contract that is subsequently renewable for another four years.
Three providers submitted bids during a public bidding process. Aramark, Next Generation - the incumbent - and Advance Meal all submitted bids, but Advance Meal's bid was the lowest.
Advance Meal will hire all of the food workers that were employed by Next Generation when it was the food management company.
Additionally, the board unanimously increased food prices to 75 cents for breakfast and $1.50 for lunch. Business Administrator Phil Grome attributed the increase to the rise in food prices and the change in food management companies.
Staff writer Alyssa Sunkin can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 239 or alyssa.sunkin@lee.net
Jeremy Ozolins said he had virtually no swimming skill when he joined the swim team, but within one year he made it to sectionals. Now, the 19-year-old Weedsport graduate is on the swim team at Clarkson College.
“The only reason why I'm on that team,” he said, “is because of Gary Earl.”
Earl said he was notified last Thursday of the district's decision not to rehire him for another year. Coaching appointments are made annually.
“It was a total surprise,” he said. “When you put this much time and energy into a program, it kind of floored me.”
As the second speaker of the night, Earl spoke directly to the three reasons given to him as to why he was not reappointed. He said he was told that he was not encouraging enough, a point he refuted.
He said he was told that the number of students interested is too few, a point he attributed to declining enrollment trends.
And he was told that he should have bestowed the two swimming scholarships upon two of this year's graduating seniors. In response, he said the three seniors on the team last year had more absences than the entire team combined. He asked fellow coaches for advice, and he said the response was to not give them out if the students had not met the criteria.
The discussion of the athletic scholarships resurfaced later on in the meeting, when board member Timothy Lally commented on the procedure for identifying the persons for awards. Reviewing the newly revised coaching handbook, Lally said the procedure by which coaches can decide who to give scholarships to is vague, allowing for a situation like that involving Earl.
He asked for - and board members agreed - to add a sentence allowing scholarship recommendations to be communicated to the awards committee, primarily comprised of teachers, to prevent any “controversial” decisions from taking place.
For nearly an hour, athletes, graduates and parents of athletes appealed to the board to reconsider its decision in not re-appointing Earl.
“When you are all done,” Board President Norm Chirco said, “we'll take what you say into consideration. We're anxious to hear what you have to say.”
In other news
* Weedsport will have a new food provider for at least one year.
The board unanimously appointed Advance Meal as the district's food management company for a one year contract that is subsequently renewable for another four years.
Three providers submitted bids during a public bidding process. Aramark, Next Generation - the incumbent - and Advance Meal all submitted bids, but Advance Meal's bid was the lowest.
Advance Meal will hire all of the food workers that were employed by Next Generation when it was the food management company.
Additionally, the board unanimously increased food prices to 75 cents for breakfast and $1.50 for lunch. Business Administrator Phil Grome attributed the increase to the rise in food prices and the change in food management companies.
Staff writer Alyssa Sunkin can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 239 or alyssa.sunkin@lee.net

Citizen
Hot Jobs
Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 58 comment(s)
Adam R wrote on Dec 3, 2009 10:27 AM:
Bilger wrote on Nov 27, 2009 10:12 PM:
horseradish wrote on Oct 9, 2009 10:50 AM:
Bilger wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:58 PM:
Adam R wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:48 AM:
Adam R wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:42 AM:
Bilger wrote on Aug 8, 2009 9:23 PM:
First off, if you didn't have Earl as a coach, your opinion really shouldn't be posted here seeing as how all you know is what you hear. There was no secret meeting to get Earl fired, thats for sure because the whole school knows my feelings and I would have been placed in the lead to see him removed from his position. He would put us down every time we lost a meet no matter what happened, we could have every individual place new personal bests and still lose but if we gave that "extra effort" we might have won. Or if we knew we wouldnt win, this meet turned more into an additional practice. In fact, he turned my meet into a practice. Nfa, for those of you who dont know thats 3 sets of 10 100's. Thats 30 100's. Thats down and back 60 times. I was to do this in 1:45 cycles for every 100. For those of you who are under the impression, I'm not a swimmer. I'm a diver. Because I wanted to spend time with my family during CHRISTMAS VACATION, one day, i was removed from a meet, forced to swim as make up practice, then we returned to the pool for aditional practice, 50 50's on 55. down and back 50 more times in 55 seconds. I'm sorry but as a diver I dont think I needed to swim half the yards I swam this year.
In response to the "three slacking seniors" Hey thanks I'm a senior. I surely didnt slack maintaining the status of a diver, ranked 3'rd in b's. Swimming in sectionals as a swimmer in the 100 back placing first in my heat and being the REAL dive coach seeing as how Earl thought he could learn to be a coach in a matter of days. Clearly since I was still coaching at the end of the season, he wasn't up to the task like he claimed to be.
Personally after reading most of this, most everyone has no idea why those who are in support of his removal are in support. Yes, the board gave legitiment reasoning to remove him BASED ON YOUR POLITICS. The real reason he is removed is because information travels. When a student talks to a teacher about unprofessional actions as a coach and a suppsoed mentor taken by Earl they might after time say something. Eventually when it travels back and from personal experience the board witnesses such events, they may need legitiment reason to not reinstate a coach, but that doesn't always intail the full reasoning for ones' dismissal. So for all of us "lazy seniors" I say why don't all of you contact us and ask us why we want to see him removed. Why did HALF of our seniors not return? Because of how they we're treated. Why did I stay? The ONLY reason I stayed that year at all was to dive. I love diving, so I dealt with his CRAP. He ruined it enough that if I had been the only diver, I would have quit. But I stayed to coach my other two divers, and then gladly taught modified as well. You know you're a bad coach when a student quits your team one week before sectionals after missing states by less than 11 points, which in diving for those who dont know, is hardly half a dive, with two more chances to make it to states, and doesnt come back the following year then after witnessing what he missed STILL wants to quit again, then you should not be a coach.
Sorry for being so late to join the discussion seeing as how no one informed me. "
MattCrowley wrote on Aug 7, 2009 2:08 PM:
MattCrowley wrote on Aug 7, 2009 1:36 PM:
KANE wrote on Aug 7, 2009 8:39 AM:
how can you assume that no one who has written these comments has ever been on one of griffen's teams?
and what about the kids that went off to college to be on a swim team?
do you really still want to say that they couldn't have handled the work load?
think again. "
suomynona wrote on Aug 7, 2009 1:00 AM:
amazed wrote on Aug 6, 2009 6:06 PM:
You seem to be saying that the most important thing is to win, some would argue that it is the journey, the challenge, the person of character that develops under a valuable coach. Is it well-rounded centered citizens we strive to be, or is champion the most important title we aspire to? "
johndoe wrote on Aug 6, 2009 5:34 PM:
Amazed wrote on Aug 6, 2009 3:47 PM:
fragonby wrote on Aug 6, 2009 3:29 PM:
Former swimmer dad: your last post I followed and was okay with all that you said up until the second to last paragraph......YOU have no idea how those Mr Earl felt walking into that board meeting only to find the newspaper there....how well do you know him? I can say I do very very well. All this chit chat and bantering is the last thing he wants. We need to make sure we have the facts before we post things...that second to last paragraph of yours was totally uncalled for!!!!!! "
former swim dad wrote on Aug 6, 2009 2:47 PM:
pickleshop - We did indeed swim against larger schools during the season - Auburn, Oswego, West Genesee and who do you think we were competing against at sectionals? A and B schools. So, I believe we are talking oranges to oranges.
fragonby - As I said in the earlier post - perhaps there is more than we will ever know about the situation and why the decision was made - the board and administrators are privy to much more information than will ever be printed in the newspaper or posted here. Did you know that discussion of specific personnel can only be held during executive session? And that no voting can occur during that time?
Weedsport Athlete03 - Did you know that the board removed three coaching positions(one being the assist. field hockey) from the current budget among other cost saving items in order to lessen the tax burden to the local taxpapers - so how could they add it back in now? Perhaps you haven't heard but the country is suffering thru an economic downturn?
To all - the Board and adiministration always put the students first in any decision they make- as difficult as it may be at times.
One final thought - do you think Mr. Earl followed the proper chain of command by bypassing the Superintendent before he rallied his family, the modified coach's family among others, as well as the newspaper to appeal to the Board?
Let's get past this, let the people who know do their jobs and support the excellent school system that we are fortunate to have at Weedsport. "
fragonby wrote on Aug 6, 2009 1:33 PM:
johndoe wrote on Aug 6, 2009 11:43 AM:
johndoe wrote on Aug 6, 2009 7:12 AM:
suomynona wrote on Aug 6, 2009 1:38 AM:
KANE wrote on Aug 5, 2009 11:34 PM:
reread that. the board does not make the decisions. it is ultimately up to the administrators. lay off of the board members. "
KANE wrote on Aug 5, 2009 11:31 PM:
for example:
at one point during my time on the weedsport varsity swimming and diving team one of my fellow teammates went on vacation during a break and while this person was gone he had made a very rude comment about the person saying that of all people to leave and go on a cruise with all you can eat buffets, it did not need to be this person. insinuating that this person already had their fair share of extra weight and did not need to gain anymore.
i find this to be a very inappropriate comment to make about one of your athletes no matter what their physical situation may be.
i also remember a specific incident after our team had just completed our last meet of the year, section III championships. we returned to the pool for the last time that season to turn in all of our gear and for a final team meeting. a brief synopsis of this meeting would be coach gary earl telling us that we failed. he just said it in a few more words. i remember everyone leaving absolutely astounded that a coach would say that to his athletes after a long season of hard work.
i specifically know of multiple people who did not return the following year because of the fact that gary earl was the coach, so for that fact i disagree with the statement claiming that fewer people are coming out for the team because enrollment is down. although that may be a contributing factor, that is not the sole factor. the way that gary earl treats his athletes is talked about in the school, which contributes to the size of the team.
dab spoke of favoritism. i think that you may not be as informed as you think you are. there was an event that took place while i still closely followed the program involving an earl benefiting from favoritism. there was a relay that had made it to the state championships. earl being a family man kindly brought his family with him. for some reason this happened to come in handy because his daughter some how ended up in a relay that she did not qualify for in sectionals. a young man who worked very hard and was much faster than his daughter was wrongly removed from the relay so that he could place his daughter on the relay. how convenient that they came.
this was not the only instance the the earl family received special treatment because dad was coach. coach's son nate actually swam varsity practices in 7th grade even though that might technically be against the rules because he was not a member of the varsity swim team, seeing as he did not pass the physical fitness test to move up early that year.
favoritism works differently with the earl family. family comes first, but it shouldn't be that way when you're the coach.
i know for a fact that of these seniors that were spoken of, at least one of them is a very hard worker. i know because i saw him come up through the program. he has put forth a lot of effort to making himself a better swimmer, a better breaststroker. yet, he is undeserving of a scholarship.
this article also fails to mention that at the previous board meeting there were many people who came to speak AGAINST coach gary earl, meaning that no, mommy and daddy are not on the school board. there are many people who have had enough of earl, but this was a gathering of his supporters, not the people that do not agree with him being the head coach.
i know the history of the weedsport swimming and diving program to be one of prestige and honor. if you step inside the pool and look up on the wall, you will see all of the titles that we have won as a team. these titles which only continue until around the time that gary earl became the head coach. i think that they may have won one title with earl. in griffins 35 or so years he made a killing and won 40+ titles. i have to point out the fact the gary earl has not helped the program what so ever. the record of the team has steadily declined since he was granted the position as head coach. for the first time weedsport has had a losing record, this being with gary earl as head coach. maybe i'm wrong but i don't think that the first losing record was the accomplishment that weedsport athletics was shooting for when they hired him..?
no matter how unhappy people become with the school boards decision, it is ultimately their decision. the people of the district elect them. meaning it is the people's choice. you must live with your actions, as they must as well.
although earl cannot make up for the many mistakes that he has made as a coach, there are people that can prevent him from making more mistakes.
i have shared with you a few of the MANY stories i have of coach gary earl not living up to the title of coach. hopefully now that you have the point of view of one of his former athletes, it will make you realize that he is not at all fit for the position of varsity swimming and diving head coach.
ON A SIDE NOTE: DPW, you must not follow weedsport athletics very well because after the last football season coach trousedale was fired as the head coach of the football team because he did not handle himself as a coach should. that is not favoritism what so ever. "
MattCrowley wrote on Aug 5, 2009 8:43 PM:
If anyone cares to hear the other side of the story, then please contact me via e-mail or phone. If I have the time I will meet with anyone that wants to talk about this.
The last thing I would like to ask, is for people to consider that as a student athlete I have other things on my agenda besides swimming. Despite my other obligations and medical conditions I still put aside family vacations and other personal time to swim year round with Coach Gary Earl(with the exception of this past summer because the pool was closed for most of that summer.) There was a strong group of swimmers in my grade that also sacrificed this time but all quit the team junior year and there was alot of unrest amongst the team. No one seems to look into that, they just label the people who quit as people who couldn't handle swimming(which is far from the truth) and the few that stayed were "lazy." Consider this thought, if we few seniors that stuck out our senior year are so lazy, why did we bother coming back? I myself considered joining the Auburn Stingrays because I do have a strong passion for swimming. The only true reason I stayed is because I didn't want to betray my team, and I didn't want Weedsport Swimming and Diving to take a fall.
Also if you would like to learn something about the "absenteeism" then I could fill you in on anything you would like to know.
If you all are going to call me lazy, look farther than what you hear in a newspaper. Ask questions, call me or the other seniors. I can guarantee you will hear things that you haven't read in a newspaper.
If anyone is to contact me, I won't slander your name or talk badly about you. I've realized more than ever that after this mess that it only makes things worse. I just want people to hear both sides of the story before they go blogging anonymously about something I feel the don't know the full extent of.
Sincerely,
A Swimmer/Student/Person,
Matt Crowley "
fragonby wrote on Aug 5, 2009 8:01 PM:
WeedsportAthlete03 wrote on Aug 5, 2009 7:53 PM:
guy wrote on Aug 5, 2009 7:00 PM:
guy wrote on Aug 5, 2009 6:51 PM:
Also to all of you, how can you be mad at the kids for feeling wronged about how they were treated when you're still complaining about ON A CITIZEN BLOG. The truth is he's gone. he isnt coming back. the school has already started the search. Get over it. "
pickleshop wrote on Aug 5, 2009 6:50 PM:
When Gary Griffen coached WCS swam agaianst schools our own size. Since Gary Earl has been coaching WCS has had to swim against A and B schools. Lets compare oranges to oranges "
former swim dad wrote on Aug 5, 2009 5:56 PM:
1. If the coach has team members who are missing practices, etc. the coach should addresss that with the swimmers - why would you keep them on the team?
2. Gary Earl has only been varisty coach since 2004. How many of his swimmers have made it to the seecond day of sectionals other than the Baker twins? How many league or sectional titles has he won? How many records have been put on the board? How many swimmers have improved their strokes, starts, turns, pick ups and/or times? Coach Griffin started with the same freshman talent as Gary Earl, but look what he ended up with by their Senior year. How many kids has Gary Earl sent to college to swim and actually earn ponts other than the Baker twins?
3. As far as taper - that is important to help the body recover after a season of hard work and many yards, to be able to improve your time.
4. There are no members of the school board who are parents of swimmers.
5. Perhaps the non awarding of scholarships was just the straw that broke the camel's back! What has really been happening or not been happening since 2004? Perhaps there is more than meets the eye. "
foolish wrote on Aug 5, 2009 4:23 PM:
how much of his own time did this coach put in outside of the high school season? How much was he reimbursed for all of his blood, sweat, and tears? You know how he was reimbursed...with a group of lazy, ungrateful and petulant athletes (as well as the good experiences working with deserving kids I would assume - which hopefully can in the long run be overriding good memories).
The funny thing is you all already know this because you and your friend Matt already explained yourself away in your posts...YOU provided the stats, the when and why you did not improve. You see; RESPECT is earned, not a birth right just deserved for putting in 3/4 of a great effort and then cruising to the finish. It is you that knows little about the sport of swimming or the mantras that the sport is built upon. I would strongly suspect that all the "others" with problems suffer from the same apathy and miseducation of "life" as you. Maybe a look in the mirror and some deep introspection will help you mature from this situation and realize where things could have been made better. "
MattCrowley wrote on Aug 5, 2009 4:09 PM:
But what I am trying to get you people to see, is that you're like wolves right now just picking away at 3 guys that swam simply because we love the sport. So we didn't always agree with our coach's methods, but that gives you people no right to sit here and sling mud at us. I didn't bring this on Coach Gary Earl, I told my parents I am done with Weedsport Swimming and Diving, so just let it be.
However the matter with the scholarships was that money was raised by the Swim Booster Club to be handed out to qualified seniors. What exactly is a scholarship? It is assistance with a graduates future. 2 graduates who were well deserving of the awards were denied due to absences. I can guarentee that if you cut out all of my absences those guys would have recieved the scholarships without hesitation.
To put a long story short, I am the bad guy in this. OK? Is that what everyone wants to hear? I'll take the blame for whatever it is that needs someone to blame. Ill wear a sign around my neck that says:
"LAZY" "UNWORTHY" "SPOILED" "SELFISH"
If that's what it takes to make people open their eyes and realize that you're accusing 3 boys with no political power in Weedsport of firing a coach...Then so be it. "
octoberic wrote on Aug 5, 2009 2:35 PM:
It's not just the coaching that makes a program work. It's mostly the students that try and participate. I've got a son that plays a sport. His coach is great. Kids don't wanna play because of the "better than you" captains, seniors, and better players of the club, none of which received awards like the former Mayor's Award. Why??? Because they were not role models for the rest of the team!
I think, no matter who says what, everyone will feel they know the truth.
For these seniors and there parents, thinking absences are no big deal... Think again. It obviously is a VERY BIG DEAL. duh! "
foolish wrote on Aug 5, 2009 2:15 PM:
suomynona wrote on Aug 5, 2009 2:09 PM:
guy wrote on Aug 5, 2009 12:55 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Aug 5, 2009 9:20 AM:
KANE wrote on Aug 5, 2009 12:12 AM:
I'm sure that those children will do just fine in the real world "cuz" they learned how to type "because" in school.
Twigles13 in response to your comment.
the three seniors that were on the team this year were...
Matt Crowley
Mike Reese
Sean Wignall
Excuse me, but I do not think that there are any WIgnalls, Crowleys, or Reeses in the Board of Education.
Cconroy in response to your comment:
The only reason that you support Earl is because your nephews are Josh, Alex, Luke and Seth Baker and they have always been treated with favoritism by Earl. Maybe you would understand had your nephew been someone with a name other than Baker or Earl.
Tim5150 in response to your comment:
Agreed. Everyone should be mature enough to not go after a board member's family. Lay off the Chircos. They are nice people. Don't judge by what other people tell you, grow up and find out for yourself.
Also, a good idea is to ask the former coach. He could tell you where the program is at and where it really should be. "
MattCrowley wrote on Aug 4, 2009 11:33 PM:
Also, the scholarships were not only based on the actions of your senior year. If you all would like to know, I swam through summers, breaks, and holidays since my 8th grade swim season. I probably contributed the most absences to my "slacking" senior comrades. I would please like for all of you to look into one minor detail though. I am a human being. Maybe I am not "deserving" of a scholarship by the standards of some people, but to sit online and post blogs about how much of "slackers" my friends are is ridiculous. Sean and Mike are both honor-roll students, both on National Honor Society, graduated with honors, Mike was an Eagle Scout and both are possibly my best friends that I may ever know. So basically, the fact that us 3 seniors had a bunch of absences makes us slackers? Seriously? I'll take the rap for it then, honestly. Call me lazy, call me whatever it is that you really desire. But to tell Sean and Mike that they aren't deserving of a simple award is beyond reason.
Just take this in and think about it. We are people too, and we didn't ask for Coach Gary Earl to be fired. "
tim5150 wrote on Aug 4, 2009 9:28 PM:
cusemoose wrote on Aug 4, 2009 8:40 PM:
For those of you who are singling out a particular Board Member and calling into question his children is offensive to say the least. You should be adult enough to say it directly to him or her, and leave the kids out of it.
If you attended last night's Board Meeting, you were able to voice your opinions, and I am sure the Board and Administration will take that into account as they review the situation. But to stoop as low as to attack a Board Member's children is pathetic. "
alexbuddy wrote on Aug 4, 2009 8:31 PM:
guy wrote on Aug 4, 2009 8:22 PM:
fragonby wrote on Aug 4, 2009 7:40 PM:
Being a coach is being a teacher not just of the sport but of respect, self worth, dignity the list goes on and on. You are doing an injustice to kids by letting them slide by.
I am a WCS graduate, was an athlete there...funny how times have changed....Mrs Jewel, Mr Griffin or Mr Lidster would have never put up with kids who did not show up for practice. I learned a lot from those three. Lessons that have carried over into my adult life. Most importantly I respected them as my coaches!!!! I knew if I did not get something it was because I did not work hard enough to get it, or someone else was better than me. I never cried at home for my parents to make it better....I worked harder. This is just HS sports people. Mr Earl is doing his job and a very good one!
It is a sad sad day when you see someone doing good in the community being stripped of there passion for no real cause.
For you board "member" or members who are using there power to get rid of Mr Earl, shame on you. Politics gone wrong is nothing but evil. To the parents.... to help take someones job away from them when they did no wrong other then not give your child a scholarship! Your children will have a tough life ahead of them. "
twingles13 wrote on Aug 4, 2009 6:35 PM:
fireguy25 wrote on Aug 4, 2009 5:59 PM:
although everyone has the right to his or her own opinion, you have got to be kidding me "the regime" if you had any clue. you may have come up with that name for his way of coaching because he was tough, however that is what makes champions and not only that it also makes athletes realize that they are capable of so much more and make them actually want to push themselves farther. Gary Earl is an upstanding person as well a a coach he may have been tough on people but he always cared for everyone on his team. He did not have this comming to him. If anyone had a problem with gary they should have told him, and not stabbed him in the back. As for the board, or who ever let gary go they should have at least given him the courtesy to explain himself. as for you GUY you, yourself have no clue what you are talking about other than being a huge baby you crying about "the regime" tells everyone that you are affraid of hard work yourself. so how about you SHUT IT "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Aug 4, 2009 5:26 PM:
I still don't think that's a bad thing.
As I said before, I don't have any first-hand knowledge of this particular situation, but I do know swimming and team dynamics (when they work and when they don't) and the difference between a good coach, a so-so coach and a really lousy coach (like my football coaches). My comments are general or speculative and I state up-front that I can't judge on this case in particular. "
2809 wrote on Aug 4, 2009 3:26 PM:
guy wrote on Aug 4, 2009 3:12 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Aug 4, 2009 1:17 PM:
freedomofspeech wrote on Aug 4, 2009 12:28 PM:
I am ashamed of our Superintendent and Board. Biting your nose to spite your face will only leave your children without opportunities we all experienced at Weedsport.
Money and Politics will be the death of us all.
Here is to a successful year at WCS. "
dab wrote on Aug 4, 2009 12:18 PM:
system is not the only place that this
behavior is displayed. It is also common practice in the community backed sports programs, including basketball, baseball and soccer. It is not only the Chirco children, but the children of at least five or six other families that receive special treatment that is not earned or deserved.
Maybe coach Earl should change his last name and if he makes a wise choice, performance will no longer matter, he could have a job in the WCS district for life. "
DPW wrote on Aug 4, 2009 11:10 AM:
cconroy wrote on Aug 4, 2009 10:41 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Aug 4, 2009 10:30 AM:
I ran track with a young woman who was very talented. She won nearly every race she entered. But she was a prima donna who often skipped practice and never put much effort in when she did show up. She was good, but she was not performing up to her potential because she didn't work at it -- she could have been much better. My coach valued the effort we each put into our work far more than winning. Sure, he wanted us to win, but he had his values on straight, so to speak. This young woman frustrated, annoyed and deeply disappointed him.
One time she and I were both running in the half mile at an away meet. I was a miler, and she was mostly a long sprinter -- 220 and 440, but that day, we were both in the 880. I was having a great day; I just felt good and was running very well. As we rounded the second turn in the first loop, I passed her. She turned to me as I was passing and said WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU ARE DOING?!?!??? I was breathing too hard for a sustained conversation, so I just answered "I'm running a race!" and kept going. The other team had a girl who was State quality who won the race, but their number 2 girl and I were neck-and-neck down the last stretch. I put my whole heart into it and beat her by the smallest nose for second place. I was heavily winded and it took me a bit before I could go over and ask the time keeper for my time. She asked my name, and I gave it, and she said, I don't have that name here. I was puzzled, and said, But I just came in second place! She looked at me and said, Yes, I recognize you but it says here Maria O'Connell came in second. I said, that's not my name -- that's my teammate who also ran. The time keeper and I just looked at each other and we knew what had happened, and she corrected the name. My teammate was so full of herself that she couldn't handle not beating me, not even once, her own teammate, and had given her name so I wouldn't get credit for having come in ahead of her. I never told my coach about it -- but he had her number. At the end of the year, she didn't get any of the awards, despite having won so many races -- because I had a coach who wasn't going to reward bad behavior.
I have many stories of coaches from whom I learned similar important lessons -- my swim coach, my soccer coach and others. The story here really resonates for me and my first thought was -- what influential person's privileged slacker son didn't get the award he thought he should get even though he was always blowing off practice? "
octoberic wrote on Aug 4, 2009 9:33 AM:
You really have no clue what you're talking about. Are you in or around Weedsport? Do you know what Coach Earl has done for that team and school?
This whole thing is simply political. Seniors did not get what they wanted, so they complained and complained and complained. It's body politics and money talking over there, plain and simple. I'm a father, tax payer, and a coach. If my son was a senior and skipping events and practices, I'd make darn sure he doesn't get what he doesn't deserve.
As a senior, you are a natural leader for your time. What kind of leadership are you providing or example are you setting by thinking you can do what you want and pick what you go to or not go to? This ain't the NFL you know!
Looking at this whole thing, I'm sure there's info the public doesn't have. The board is stating their reasons based on the account of a few. It's no shock to me at all that Mr. Chirco is supporting a decions against allowing Coach to do his job.... as I said, it's money and politics.
I think they need to pull each and every swimmer that was coached or influenced by Coach Earl. Then, and only then, will the school have evidence and proof on the three little pigs reasons for firing him!
Coach, good luck. You've done more for WSC as a swimming coach than most anyone there in 13 years. "
FS II wrote on Aug 4, 2009 9:05 AM:
stick wrote on Aug 4, 2009 7:44 AM:
interesting wrote on Aug 4, 2009 7:38 AM: