AUBURN - Some local residents are concerned about a housing development proposed for a west-end neighborhood.
A number of those residents voiced their opposition Tuesday to the Auburn Planning Board during a public hearing.
The development in question proposes building 30 semi-detached homes and a community building on 8.5 acres off Clark Street and Belmont Avenue. The units would be available to low-income renters, families with developmentally disabled members and those in need of other human services, according to the proposal.
Linda Cotler was one of five local residents who said they were not properly notified by the city or the developers about the project. Cotler, who lives in the neighborhood, said she has already received 70 signatures for a petition against the housing units.
“We're in a position where so many people weren't notified,” Cotler said. “There isn't one person who wants this to go through.”
Some who spoke out against the project predicted the units will negatively impact the neighborhood's quality of life, adding to traffic, noise and light pollution.
Local resident Tony Siracusa told the board he is worried about the people who would be living there. A number of low-income housing units already exist on Belmont Avenue, with “garbage all over the place,” Siracusa said.
“Nobody is going to take care of them,” he said of the proposed units.
The development would consist of two and three-bedroom units, according to the presentation given to the board. Syracuse-based Two Plus Four Companies would manage and own the units, and Cayuga County Homsite Development would be a partner in ownership.
The $6.8 million project would be financed by the New York State Housing Trust Fund, Two Plus Four President Susan Bacon Kimmel said. While the city of Auburn will not provide funds, Kimmel said the developers might still approach the city for payment in lieu of taxes.
Kimmel said the two-room homes would be available to incomes between $12,200 and $16,350, and the three-room homes to incomes between $18,275 and 19,900. But she also said the project does not involve rental assistance, and all tenants more than 18 years old will undergo criminal and credit background checks.
“If they have any felony conviction, they cannot live in these units,” she said.
Kimmel also encouraged residents to take a look at other local housing units her company manages, such as Auburn Heights and Northbrook Courts, and see how the company manages its properties.
Not everyone who spoke during the public hearing was opposed to the project. Seneca County resident Cynthia St. George, who works with the Seneca-Cayuga ARC, urged those listening to consider the people who need those types of developments to have a place to live.
“It's always about 'not in my backyard,'” said St. George, who did not initially attend the meeting to speak at the hearing. “Our consumers need a place to live, too.”
The board took no action on the issue Tuesday, though a vote on the proposal could take place at next month's meeting.
The city Zoning Board of Appeals is scheduled to consider two items related to the project - a request for a zoning variance and an environmental review - at its May 26 meeting. There will be a formal public hearing on the project at that meeting, as well.
Staff writer Christopher Caskey can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 282 or christopher.caskey@lee.net.
The development in question proposes building 30 semi-detached homes and a community building on 8.5 acres off Clark Street and Belmont Avenue. The units would be available to low-income renters, families with developmentally disabled members and those in need of other human services, according to the proposal.
Linda Cotler was one of five local residents who said they were not properly notified by the city or the developers about the project. Cotler, who lives in the neighborhood, said she has already received 70 signatures for a petition against the housing units.
“We're in a position where so many people weren't notified,” Cotler said. “There isn't one person who wants this to go through.”
Some who spoke out against the project predicted the units will negatively impact the neighborhood's quality of life, adding to traffic, noise and light pollution.
Local resident Tony Siracusa told the board he is worried about the people who would be living there. A number of low-income housing units already exist on Belmont Avenue, with “garbage all over the place,” Siracusa said.
“Nobody is going to take care of them,” he said of the proposed units.
The development would consist of two and three-bedroom units, according to the presentation given to the board. Syracuse-based Two Plus Four Companies would manage and own the units, and Cayuga County Homsite Development would be a partner in ownership.
The $6.8 million project would be financed by the New York State Housing Trust Fund, Two Plus Four President Susan Bacon Kimmel said. While the city of Auburn will not provide funds, Kimmel said the developers might still approach the city for payment in lieu of taxes.
Kimmel said the two-room homes would be available to incomes between $12,200 and $16,350, and the three-room homes to incomes between $18,275 and 19,900. But she also said the project does not involve rental assistance, and all tenants more than 18 years old will undergo criminal and credit background checks.
“If they have any felony conviction, they cannot live in these units,” she said.
Kimmel also encouraged residents to take a look at other local housing units her company manages, such as Auburn Heights and Northbrook Courts, and see how the company manages its properties.
Not everyone who spoke during the public hearing was opposed to the project. Seneca County resident Cynthia St. George, who works with the Seneca-Cayuga ARC, urged those listening to consider the people who need those types of developments to have a place to live.
“It's always about 'not in my backyard,'” said St. George, who did not initially attend the meeting to speak at the hearing. “Our consumers need a place to live, too.”
The board took no action on the issue Tuesday, though a vote on the proposal could take place at next month's meeting.
The city Zoning Board of Appeals is scheduled to consider two items related to the project - a request for a zoning variance and an environmental review - at its May 26 meeting. There will be a formal public hearing on the project at that meeting, as well.
Staff writer Christopher Caskey can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 282 or christopher.caskey@lee.net.

Citizen
Hot Jobs
Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 17 comment(s)
interesting wrote on May 7, 2009 6:17 AM:
sick of it wrote on May 6, 2009 7:55 PM:
Voice of Auburn wrote on May 6, 2009 7:34 PM:
cnysucks wrote on May 6, 2009 4:38 PM:
RosieD wrote on May 6, 2009 1:29 PM:
I am very familiar with the area of Clark & Belmont, living not too far from there in the summer & I regularly pick-up a friend on Belmont for social outings in the evening. I'm sure she & her husband must be aghast at this not well thought out plan, realizing what it would do to the value of their well cared for & maintained property on Belmont. I know if this plan should ever come to pass, I certainly would never venture onto Belmont after dark & probably not during day-light hours either.
Vactioning from my current permanent residence in a heavily populated metropolitan area in So. Florida, I know too well how these types of projects effect the quality of life for those who have poured blood, sweat & tears into the pride of home-ownership by endeavoring to maintain their properties and then to lose all their gains to the gains in the pockets of some politicians who make such stupid decisions at the behest of out of state developers.
There are plenty of properties in the City proper of Auburn and in the County that could & should be rehabilitated to serve the needy. But of course, that would take somebody with a back-bone at City Hall & on the 6th floor of the County Office building who is truly committed to their city,county & their constituents instead of the current "what's in it for me" attitude.
To me, a progressive, forward looking administration, in both the city & county would be looking at ways to cure the cancer that is already here, not creating a new source for the spread of more cancer.
To me, a progressive, forward looking citizenry would be demanding that. Remember folks, when you go to the polls you get what you ask for!!! "
sick of it wrote on May 6, 2009 12:56 PM:
bizzaro-world wrote on May 6, 2009 11:07 AM:
interesting wrote on May 6, 2009 10:24 AM:
CayCntyLifer wrote on May 6, 2009 9:09 AM:
hoopes_dt wrote on May 6, 2009 8:35 AM:
There is little that our neighborhoods and politicians can do to prevent these unethical corporations/organizations from developing in our neighborhoods... They can, however, legally demand accountability for neighborhood influence and legislate accountability for the ramifications of failed housing!
Whoever planned this project located it in close proximity to Fingerlakes mall and the arterial - high-speed access to walmart and other distant corporations. These residents would be better served by proximity to local amenities like Wegmans and the other businesses downtown, rather than sending their tax-exemptions to unethical corporation in Texas.
These two organizations should be purchasing run-down buildings downtown and renovating them for mixed-income tenants.
Save our buildings, support local businesses, and promote embraced diversity! It's not rocket science, paying a little bit more for a strategy that we know works is money well-spent.
Maybe next time the Citizen can announce these public meetings online before-hand? "
FS II wrote on May 6, 2009 8:26 AM:
interesting wrote on May 6, 2009 8:12 AM:
bizzaro-world wrote on May 6, 2009 8:11 AM:
interesting wrote on May 6, 2009 8:10 AM:
CayCntyLifer wrote on May 6, 2009 7:52 AM:
justventing wrote on May 6, 2009 7:37 AM:
doodles13021 wrote on May 6, 2009 6:37 AM: