The day after Thanksgiving is known across the country as Black Friday, and in the village of Skaneateles, it's also the start of Dickens' Christmas.
But this year, truckers hope it's recognized as the day they took over Skaneateles.
Truck drivers are calling for a slow-moving protest in which tractor trailers motor along Genesee Street in Skaneateles. This scheduled protest is in response to the state Department of Transportation's recent proposal to keep large trucks off some rural routes, such as state Routes 41 and 41A.
However, the measure would allow them to continue to travel on Route 20 because Genesee Street is a national road.
An organization called Truckers and Citizens United planned this effort a month ago, according to Charlie Claburn, the group's Northeast regional director. The Web site states “Gov. Paterson fails to recognize the 500,000 truck jobs in the state of New York. He is (adhering) the needs of the few that outweigh the needs of the many.”
If truck drivers are willing to give up their holiday weekend to descend on to Skaneateles next week, the day Dickens' starts would be one of the worst days to stage this protest, local officials say.
The day wasn't intentionally chosen to disrupt the Christmas celebration in Skaneateles, Claburn said. He said that more than 300 truck drivers from the region, and some from out of state who drive on the roads will come. They plan to go through Auburn that morning and into Skaneateles on Route 20.
While the DOT's proposed regulation would be the latest hit to the trucking industry, Claburn says truck drivers want lawmakers to re-examine rules governing the entire industry.
Officials in the Finger Lakes region first began protesting garbage trucks taking shortcuts along the region's lakes. However, most of those truckers who are slated to participate in the protest do not drive garbage trucks, Claburn said.
“The governor isn't listening. He wasn't listening when they had 300 trucks crammed in his front door in Albany,” Claburn said about a similar ride in the state capital in June.
“It's not just about these roads,” he said of the list of rural routes truckers could no longer travel on.
Trucking companies take issue with the fact that they are taxed in multiple ways and the state's high cost of diesel compared to the nation's average.
“Why would you want to break the backs of the last source of income (for truckers)?” Claburn asked hypothetically.
Staff writer Jessica Soule can be reached at 253-5311, ext. 267 or jessica.soule@lee.net
Truck drivers are calling for a slow-moving protest in which tractor trailers motor along Genesee Street in Skaneateles. This scheduled protest is in response to the state Department of Transportation's recent proposal to keep large trucks off some rural routes, such as state Routes 41 and 41A.
However, the measure would allow them to continue to travel on Route 20 because Genesee Street is a national road.
An organization called Truckers and Citizens United planned this effort a month ago, according to Charlie Claburn, the group's Northeast regional director. The Web site states “Gov. Paterson fails to recognize the 500,000 truck jobs in the state of New York. He is (adhering) the needs of the few that outweigh the needs of the many.”
If truck drivers are willing to give up their holiday weekend to descend on to Skaneateles next week, the day Dickens' starts would be one of the worst days to stage this protest, local officials say.
The day wasn't intentionally chosen to disrupt the Christmas celebration in Skaneateles, Claburn said. He said that more than 300 truck drivers from the region, and some from out of state who drive on the roads will come. They plan to go through Auburn that morning and into Skaneateles on Route 20.
While the DOT's proposed regulation would be the latest hit to the trucking industry, Claburn says truck drivers want lawmakers to re-examine rules governing the entire industry.
Officials in the Finger Lakes region first began protesting garbage trucks taking shortcuts along the region's lakes. However, most of those truckers who are slated to participate in the protest do not drive garbage trucks, Claburn said.
“The governor isn't listening. He wasn't listening when they had 300 trucks crammed in his front door in Albany,” Claburn said about a similar ride in the state capital in June.
“It's not just about these roads,” he said of the list of rural routes truckers could no longer travel on.
Trucking companies take issue with the fact that they are taxed in multiple ways and the state's high cost of diesel compared to the nation's average.
“Why would you want to break the backs of the last source of income (for truckers)?” Claburn asked hypothetically.
Staff writer Jessica Soule can be reached at 253-5311, ext. 267 or jessica.soule@lee.net
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 28 comment(s)
the congressman wrote on Nov 24, 2008 4:25 AM:
25,000 just in heavy highway use tax per
vehicle then 550 dollars for hut tax and
then ifta tax fed dollars the ifta then
they pay pump tax at pump then personal income and property tax school tax are you nuts no one has any right to tell them where to drive they pay as an industry more than half the money ny spends on roads and bridges.
Then this is how smart yall are take the other roads and now feds say you can't take 20 away so all the trucks will be in center of town all the time
smart move!yeah real smart do you have any clue what you would do without trucks? yeah they stick together hual garbage haul lumber it's all the same it pays the bills. They are just trying to make a living, then this stupid hazzardous chemicals comment you are so
uneducated about the trash thing you just open your mouth and ooops munnicipal solid waste is non HAZZARDOUS
household garbage you know the same crap you throw out then send threw someone elses town but thats ok right?
fmsca says municipal solid waste, this is not radioactive isotopes you brainy
smart people. If a whole load of garbage dumped in that lake it would do little more than well say the equivilent to a cup of koolaid on the kitchen floor wow your dumb! "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Nov 20, 2008 9:45 AM:
The attitude exhibited by gman is the perfect example of the Ugly American in his own home country, and it's one reason why so many people don't have all that much sympathy for truckers.
Just remember, for the 900th time, since it never seems to sink in -- no one is complaining about local trucking bringing goods from centralized delivery points to stores and homes. The problem is with heavy truck traffic on roads not designed to carry such traffic and particularly when they are hauling downstate trash to Seneca Meadows.
Since we are such fools to have allowed the downstaters to dump THEIR waste in OUR backyard, maybe we could at least put in a rail line so we don't have all the trucks on our small town and rural roads which are not equipped to handle them. "
brew1234 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 10:33 PM:
gman wrote on Nov 19, 2008 7:32 PM:
nature lover wrote on Nov 19, 2008 6:54 PM:
gennygirl wrote on Nov 19, 2008 6:36 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Nov 19, 2008 5:24 PM:
Steve, if you read what I wrote, I said NO ONE IS COMPLAINING ABOUT LOCAL TRUCK TRAFFIC. We know there are local trucks delivering goods locally -- and we'd like to support MORE of that. That's our point exactly. It does nothing to change the fact that heavy non-local truck traffic is a serious problem. "
jssk61806 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 4:56 PM:
nature lover wrote on Nov 19, 2008 4:09 PM:
"NONE of what they haul, is getting into our lakes or streams! It's contained INSIDE the trucks!"
I take it u arent aware of the roll overs...only a couple made the actual news and the trash that WAS contained inside, is now OUTSIDE!! Its a simple concept to grasp.
Stevedallas u always post like u want to kiss a truckers keyster. Do u have ANY relevent details besides your one line come backs? If u read regularly u would know its the ENTIRE lakes area and its the NYC truckers hauling trash. If u know "truckers" u should tell them how ignorant they were to go against the population and actually side with the trash haulers as comrades. If they had sided w/us perhaps restrictions would have been implied on the actual wrong doers. Besides Steve-o were u aware of the police task force that pulls trucks over? The fines generated from the violations are very high. So what do u have to say in favor of that subject? "
jssk61806 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 3:39 PM:
Really?? Okay..NONE of what they haul, is getting into our lakes or streams! It's contained INSIDE the trucks! And..everybody's screaming about the damage to the roads, 'because' of the trucks...do you all forget, that there are other vehicles that also travel those roads? (ie: SUV's, cars, pick-ups, 10-wheelers, 8 wheelers..etc) Those, in addition, tear up the roads also...are you going to kick THEM off the roads as well ?? Sometimes people surprise me by the amount, and reason, that they conjure up to complain about. These truckers, are working for YOU, delivering goods FOR you...lets not forget 'that' ! .... Amazing. "
stevedallas wrote on Nov 19, 2008 3:03 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Nov 19, 2008 2:10 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Nov 19, 2008 2:05 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Nov 19, 2008 2:04 PM:
The heavy truck traffic through small towns and rural areas all over this region is a serious problem for lots of non-snobby simple working class people as well as the fancy folks you are dissing. The crack is utterly irrelevant. "
stevedallas wrote on Nov 19, 2008 1:55 PM:
The Truth wrote on Nov 19, 2008 1:46 PM:
Skaneateles = Snobs "
Unknown... wrote on Nov 19, 2008 12:24 PM:
bobaltec wrote on Nov 19, 2008 10:35 AM:
Additionally as someone who has traveled from Auburn to Cortland a fair number of times, the truck traffic on 41A or 41 was never prohibitive to driving. Yes there were usually trucks and Yes they were driving safely.
The governor didn't really get it when they did this in Albany according to the article - but some other law makers sure were responsive. It also made press all over including the Sirius Channel 147 "
nature lover wrote on Nov 19, 2008 10:30 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Nov 19, 2008 9:10 AM:
brew is 100% right -- ship by rail. Trucks should be used for local hauling ONLY. It is so much more fuel efficient and cost effective, and there isn't the wear and tear on the roads the rest of us use, nor the need to share the road with half-asleep truckers on a cross-country marathon.
Truckers always threaten to pass on the extra cost of staying on the highways which were made for truck traffic (and OFF THE ROADS WHICH WERE NOT!!! MADE FOR TRUCK TRAFFIC) to the consumers --
but WE ARE ALREAY PAYING:
--We have to keep paying to have our small town and rural roads repaired so much more frequently thanks to the damage done by heavy truck traffic.
--We have to pay in terms of risk to natural environments, especially from garbage trucks and hazardous waste disposal vehicles hauling their dangerous loads alongside our lakes and streams.
--We have to pay in terms of the risk to our children and our pets as trucks speed through our small towns and rural areas.
--We already pay in terms of how much more it costs to move goods across country in small tractor trailer loads compared to what you could haul in a long frieght train.
Ship by rail, and put those truckers to work on the railroad instead of the highway. Trucks for local deliveries only, reduce the need for gas-monster-sized trucks, return peace and quiet to the small towns and countryside and tell those bullies to stick it in their ears.
Don't let yourself be twisted up in the rhetoric either -- no one is complaining about local truck traffic. No one is complaining about smaller trucks which bring goods to stores and homes. We are complaining about big trucks, many traveling way too fast, and certainly way too many of these trucks, traveling over roads which were not designed for heavy truck traffic as they move goods interstate which would have been better shipped by rail.
Just think, maybe tanda could stay home with his family more if trucks were only used locally to get goods from the railroad stations to the end destination. But for now, hey, you chose the trucker profession, don't come crying because you have to give up so much family time to do the job.
Let's beef up the way-too-long neglected railroad infrastructure (thank you Teamsters, not) and get goods moving in a safer, cheaper, more environmentally friendly fashion, and keep truckers local where they don't have to give up all that family time -- and the rest of us don't have to contend with the mess they make of our roads.
Sure hope there are some solid shows of counter protest in Skaneatles against the in-your-face bully-boy tactics. "
nature lover wrote on Nov 19, 2008 8:02 AM:
And "friendly" trucker tanda32? thats a laugh as they are good at flipping u the bird as they barrel past your house loaded with trash stinking to high heaven...yup friendly thats the word I would use...NOT!!! "
tanda32 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 6:44 AM:
shoemaker187 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 6:40 AM:
west high 69 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 5:52 AM:
james_13021 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 5:47 AM:
Stop letting those pencil pushers push you around! "
brew1234 wrote on Nov 19, 2008 2:40 AM:
dan w wrote on Nov 19, 2008 2:00 AM:
ethan wrote on Nov 19, 2008 1:46 AM: