When does being a Good Samaritan become a legal issue?
I raise the question after reading a recent story about a man who has been giving rides to his neighbors for 25 years. Dave Bell, who resides in the Adirondack Mountain village of Tupper Lake, said he offers 20 to 200 rides each week, free of charge.
Motivated by a personal incident that occurred in his youth; the majority of Bell's passengers are under the influence.
But the local police have issued a warning to Bell, as he is not licensed or insured as a taxi driver.
The village passed an ordinance in 1946 prohibiting any motor vehicle engaged in the business of carrying persons for hire.
But Bell doesn't charge his travelers.
Bell insists he acts only as a designated driver or kind neighbor. However, the frequency of his ride-along services and the fact that he isn't insured as public transportation call into question the legitimacy of his practices.
It's a really tough call. It's difficult to punish someone who is only trying to do the right thing. I think we've all been in a situation where a friend or maybe even ourselves has had too much to drink.
It's awkward; what if my friend gets mad? What if my coworker gets offended? What if that drunk throws up in my car?
It's almost too easy to say good night and let someone drive drunk.
It's touching to know that there are people out there, everyday heroes, who are prompted by good rather than money. And I've seen dozens of PSAs reminding me to designate a driver. Why can't Bell be the resident DD?
Frankly, I'd take a taxi before I'd accept a ride, even from a close friend.
I am a little uncomfortable with charity and I can never seem to swallow my pride.
I imagine there are a good number of people who, like me, wouldn't accept a ride from Bell, even if they knew him. Surely the taxi services can co-exist with one charitable man.
Bottom line; you can't limit the number of friends someone has or the number of good deeds they can offer.
If the good citizens of Tupper Lake trust Bell and feel safe in his vehicle, then who are we to stop generosity?
As long as Bell isn't promoting his services commercially or soliciting business from strangers, I see nothing wrong with his practice.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
Motivated by a personal incident that occurred in his youth; the majority of Bell's passengers are under the influence.
But the local police have issued a warning to Bell, as he is not licensed or insured as a taxi driver.
The village passed an ordinance in 1946 prohibiting any motor vehicle engaged in the business of carrying persons for hire.
But Bell doesn't charge his travelers.
Bell insists he acts only as a designated driver or kind neighbor. However, the frequency of his ride-along services and the fact that he isn't insured as public transportation call into question the legitimacy of his practices.
It's a really tough call. It's difficult to punish someone who is only trying to do the right thing. I think we've all been in a situation where a friend or maybe even ourselves has had too much to drink.
It's awkward; what if my friend gets mad? What if my coworker gets offended? What if that drunk throws up in my car?
It's almost too easy to say good night and let someone drive drunk.
It's touching to know that there are people out there, everyday heroes, who are prompted by good rather than money. And I've seen dozens of PSAs reminding me to designate a driver. Why can't Bell be the resident DD?
Frankly, I'd take a taxi before I'd accept a ride, even from a close friend.
I am a little uncomfortable with charity and I can never seem to swallow my pride.
I imagine there are a good number of people who, like me, wouldn't accept a ride from Bell, even if they knew him. Surely the taxi services can co-exist with one charitable man.
Bottom line; you can't limit the number of friends someone has or the number of good deeds they can offer.
If the good citizens of Tupper Lake trust Bell and feel safe in his vehicle, then who are we to stop generosity?
As long as Bell isn't promoting his services commercially or soliciting business from strangers, I see nothing wrong with his practice.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
