AUBURN - The Auburn Enlarged City School District Board of Education may have a new code of ethics, but one board member said he won't be following it.
“I'm not going to abide by these rules,” Joe Leogrande said. “I'm still going to continue doing what I've been doing because these are a violation of freedom of speech and the U.S. Constitution.”
In a 7-1 vote, the board Tuesday evening adopted a revised ethics policy that lays out proper board member conduct during meetings and out in the community, but not when it relates to the press.
Leogrande voted against it while Fred Cornelius was not present.
Leogrande said that he spoke to a constitutional lawyer, who stated that the ethics policy, even without a proposed section detailing the board's relationship with the media, would put a “muzzle” on free speech and would constitute a violation of the United States Constitution.
Ginny Kent disagreed with Leogrande, saying the policy is nearly identical to that of the New York State School Boards Association.
“All this does is encourage us - in fact demands of us - that we act in accordance with a code of conduct.”
While Leogrande had multiple objections throughout the policy, he was strongly opposed to a section included in the first draft, but excluded in the final copy, that dealt exclusively with governing the relationship between the board and the press.
Prior drafts stated that board members were not to initiate communication with the media, but could answer questions if approached by reporters.
At the Policy Committee meeting last week, Kent suggested instead that the statements regarding the relationship with the media would be better suited in a policy dealing with community relations.
Two weeks ago, Leogrande levied a blistering critique of the policy, saying it would stifle free speech and close communications with the media. He also likened the ethics policy to another proposed policy that would empower the board to remove a board member if there was a flagrant ethical breach, saying that it would effectively circumvent the rights of voters.
The committee will not look at that policy until next month, at the earliest.
Board member Michael Stearns acknowledged Leogrande's position on the ethics code, but said he expects himself to uphold those rules.
“I'm not saying that all your comments are without merits,” Stearns said. “I am saying that some of your comments leave me to believe that you are questioning this because you feel that this policy was directed and modified for you.”
“You are very perceptive,” Leogrande responded.
Staff writer Alyssa Sunkin can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 239 or alyssa.sunkin@lee.net
In a 7-1 vote, the board Tuesday evening adopted a revised ethics policy that lays out proper board member conduct during meetings and out in the community, but not when it relates to the press.
Leogrande voted against it while Fred Cornelius was not present.
Leogrande said that he spoke to a constitutional lawyer, who stated that the ethics policy, even without a proposed section detailing the board's relationship with the media, would put a “muzzle” on free speech and would constitute a violation of the United States Constitution.
Ginny Kent disagreed with Leogrande, saying the policy is nearly identical to that of the New York State School Boards Association.
“All this does is encourage us - in fact demands of us - that we act in accordance with a code of conduct.”
While Leogrande had multiple objections throughout the policy, he was strongly opposed to a section included in the first draft, but excluded in the final copy, that dealt exclusively with governing the relationship between the board and the press.
Prior drafts stated that board members were not to initiate communication with the media, but could answer questions if approached by reporters.
At the Policy Committee meeting last week, Kent suggested instead that the statements regarding the relationship with the media would be better suited in a policy dealing with community relations.
Two weeks ago, Leogrande levied a blistering critique of the policy, saying it would stifle free speech and close communications with the media. He also likened the ethics policy to another proposed policy that would empower the board to remove a board member if there was a flagrant ethical breach, saying that it would effectively circumvent the rights of voters.
The committee will not look at that policy until next month, at the earliest.
Board member Michael Stearns acknowledged Leogrande's position on the ethics code, but said he expects himself to uphold those rules.
“I'm not saying that all your comments are without merits,” Stearns said. “I am saying that some of your comments leave me to believe that you are questioning this because you feel that this policy was directed and modified for you.”
“You are very perceptive,” Leogrande responded.
Staff writer Alyssa Sunkin can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 239 or alyssa.sunkin@lee.net
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 9 comment(s)
Unknown... wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:32 PM:
stevedallas wrote on Sep 24, 2008 5:51 PM:
carolc wrote on Sep 24, 2008 3:00 PM:
Who is the Board afraid of? Leogrande or the public? WHy can't we know these things? If there is already a School Board Policy, why do we need a new one? Who is in charge? Taxpayers? Mr Pabis who is the superintendent should report to the Board, who reports to ME. AND YOU. SO then, why can't Mr Leogrande squeal? Unless the issue is a personel one, are we all not entitled to hear what is being done or said? I just don't understand how these things happen. We have new members of this board, what don't we hear word one from them? You know, the ones who were interested in the children? If they were (interested in kids) I think they should uphold the policies IN PLACE and not create new ones to circumvent the system and create an even more elitist board. Remember - we voted for these men and women. OUR word is final NOT theirs. AM I the only one disappointed here? Do we constantly have to go thru this year after year...who is in charge?
PS Just because they don't like Leogrande is NO reason for new policies. ANd if they kick him off, then we will know our word counts for nothing. Remember that! "
demsarecrazy wrote on Sep 24, 2008 12:14 PM:
fedupstate wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:53 AM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Sep 24, 2008 11:00 AM:
Did JD Pabis advise the board to seek legal council prior to placing this item for a public vote?
I read the remarks from Lansford and I quote
"Leogrande had said earlier he talked with a former Union Springs school district and constitutional lawyer who questioned the legality of much of the ethics policy. Leogrande has said publicly that the ethics changes were designed to muzzle dissent.
"I think your friend the lawyer is really ignorant of school law," Lansford said.
After Leogrande suggested Lansford talk with the lawyer, Lansford replied, "I'm going to debate with you, Mr. Leogrande, because you're my colleague. If you're going to bring in outside sources, I don't care about your sources. We have to follow school law in the state of New York. . . . You keep jumping three tiers to the United States Congress, which is none of your damn business on this board."
This man is a dangerous individual who is hell bent on control. This is a prime example of why we need a new school board and a new Superintendent.
I firmly believe the end result will be a law suit whereas the taxpayers will have to foot the bill because of reckless action by an inexperienced superintendent and a bobble head board.
Its Time for a change folks. And nothing they can do will stop it. "
PDT wrote on Sep 24, 2008 10:43 AM:
1. What are these people trying to hide?
2. What is still in the "code of conduct" that Mr. Leogrande objects to? "
tome8689 wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:49 AM:
stevedallas wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:35 AM: