According to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Bear Stearns was one of the disasters that qualified under his “they're too big to fail” criteria that we, the American taxpayers bailed out for $29 billion.
However, Bear Stearns was primarily a huge investment bank and investment banks help companies and governments raise money by issuing and selling securities in the capital markets as well as providing advice on transactions such as mergers and acquisitions.
They were not a traditional commercial bank that normally issued mortgages, so why did we bail them out?
Weren't they one of the “smart money” Wall Street movers and shakers?
Smart? Absolutely! Because they got bailed out when they shouldn't have.
Thanks, Henry.
But more importantly - how did America get into such a disastrous financial situation in the first place anyway?
We believe it was greatly amplified by the GW Bush Administration and their 'hands off' attitude that big business could best police itself and didn't need federal regulations.
Right!
We wound up instead with “excessive deregulation” and where “greed is good” was the overriding big business ethic - regulation - instead.
For example: No proof of income was required and if one had a 'pulse,' one could get a sub-prime mortgage which started this whole mess.
How can we not have a financial disaster, with such federally condoned loose lending practices?
Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, has now issued such rules as that no mortgages were to be issued unless one can prove that he or she could afford them.
How can such a basic law not be on the previous books if there was no collusion or corruption on the part of big business and the government?
Excessive deregulation and greed?
You bet your sub-prime mortgage it was.
And it still is because banks are still sending out credit cards to college students where “no minimum income is required” to qualify for one of those look alike recycled sub-prime loans.
And the beat goes on.
It's your money.
Bill Balyszak
Auburn
They were not a traditional commercial bank that normally issued mortgages, so why did we bail them out?
Weren't they one of the “smart money” Wall Street movers and shakers?
Smart? Absolutely! Because they got bailed out when they shouldn't have.
Thanks, Henry.
But more importantly - how did America get into such a disastrous financial situation in the first place anyway?
We believe it was greatly amplified by the GW Bush Administration and their 'hands off' attitude that big business could best police itself and didn't need federal regulations.
Right!
We wound up instead with “excessive deregulation” and where “greed is good” was the overriding big business ethic - regulation - instead.
For example: No proof of income was required and if one had a 'pulse,' one could get a sub-prime mortgage which started this whole mess.
How can we not have a financial disaster, with such federally condoned loose lending practices?
Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, has now issued such rules as that no mortgages were to be issued unless one can prove that he or she could afford them.
How can such a basic law not be on the previous books if there was no collusion or corruption on the part of big business and the government?
Excessive deregulation and greed?
You bet your sub-prime mortgage it was.
And it still is because banks are still sending out credit cards to college students where “no minimum income is required” to qualify for one of those look alike recycled sub-prime loans.
And the beat goes on.
It's your money.
Bill Balyszak
Auburn
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 4 comment(s)
AJ wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:23 PM:
AJ wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:18 PM:
They are nothing but a bunch of crooks.
FG, I was always under the impression that the court didn't actually rule that way, but an improperly worded heading in a journal led to misinterpretations (if I am not mistaken the clerk entering it may have had ties to the railroads).
If you have any good links let me know. Thanks... "
demsarecrazy wrote on Sep 22, 2008 1:40 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:02 PM:
If you really want to get down to brass tacks, you have to go back to Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) where, under undue influence from the railroads, the most powerful corporation of the time, the Supreme Court MIS-interpreted the Constitution to say that corporations are persons with the same rights as natural human persons.
Since that time, slick corporate lawyers have found ways to parlay that grotesque perversion of our law to give corporations MORE rights than natural persons and now have generations of precedence piled on besides.
The only way to undo this terrible wrong and set us back on a path where human persons (and nature) can fight back against the harm done us in every venue by corporate power is to reverse that perverted interpretation of the Constitution -- you can bet that it is absolutely against the intentions of the Founding Fathers and any other normally thinking person.
Until then, corporations will go right on doing whatever they want to do, milking the rest of us slobs for every increasing profits while destroying our homes, our health, our communities, the quality of our live and our natural environment, all in pursuit of ever larger profits -- while the courts back up their right to do so.
Until you cut out the root, the weed will just keep growing. "