So-called Patriot Act denies citizens their rights

Monday, July 14, 2008 11:43 AM EDT

No true believer in America would ever have voted for the recent version of the “Anti” Patriot Act, an Act that trashes all of the principles that made America the no. 1 moral nation in the world. This Act so expands the spying powers government to all citizens, that any clever government employees could easily fabricate an excuse for spying.
Ridiculous! We are lawful citizens of America we are not the enemy.

Speaking to all representatives, by virtue of your unpatriotic actions you place yourselves as anti-patriots compared to those who are true patriots. Not only do you create your own enemies from within, but also of those of peoples in other nations of the world, ones that heap their hatred and rage not only on you in power, but on us innocent citizens.

You shame us in the eyes of all nations throughout the world.

By your support and compliance with these administration's actions you have caused the nations of the world to view us as no different from the evil Nazis. You do this all with the excuse you are protecting us.

Instead you are placing our lives in greater danger.

We such as Senator Byrd, Ron Paul and Ralph Nader, are not paralyzed with fear of any nation that may get a bomb, nor any that has one, nor any that has hundreds or even thousands upon thousands.

Even if we were conquered, which I feel is impossible, we would live as we do under this repressive administration (and that includes both houses of Congress).

We remain true to and support those principles without fear as set forth by the founding fathers of our country under all circumstances.

Peter Kotzer

Auburn

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 16 comment(s)

Farmer's Gal wrote on Jul 15, 2008 11:50 AM:

" Oh, and yes, as a kid, the government tapped our phones. Playboy published the phone numbers for various high ranking politicians, and my dad, always the wise-guy, called and got hold of the immediate assistant to the Secretary of State (I believe it was Kissinger at the time). He politely told the gentleman what he thought was wrong with the country. After that, our phone was tapped for some months.

Later in my life I had a very unpleasant experience with an agent provacateur sent to my home with my small children because the government did not like my now-ex-husband's politics. I did not like having some yahoo bring a loaded assault weapon into the vicinity of my kids in hopes my husband would put fingerprints on it, nor his talk of how he hoped a cop would stop him so he could blow the guy away -- in hopes of getting my ex, who was never a violent or criminal person, to agree and make similar comments which this agent was secretly taping.

So, yes, our government DOES engage in surveillance and other invasions of privacy against its own law-abiding citizens and it is a despicable contradiction of our guaranteed freedoms. "

Farmer's Gal wrote on Jul 15, 2008 11:43 AM:

" Prior to committing a crime, people are innocent until proven guilty in this country. Maybe you thought the world of Minority Report would be a good place to live. "

Farmer's Gal wrote on Jul 15, 2008 11:42 AM:

" The right to privacy and to unreasonable search -- but we've had this argument before and it's not worth wasting my efforts again.

Basically, the argument that giving up freedoms "is for your own safety" is about as Big Brother as you can get, and what really scares me are the people who actually believe it. "

dd wrote on Jul 14, 2008 6:57 PM:

" AJ thinks our gubment is a bunch of voyeurs. Seriously, AJ, why is it so hard for you to believe that it is much nicer to catch someone PRIOR to committing a crime? Just think---if the CIA and FBI had cooperated, and shared information, WTC would still be standing rather than us chasing Bin Laden after the fact. You just don't get it, do your research, ets etc etc........... "

chris van note wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:57 PM:

" AJ, your condenscending tone is noted. We all know that you think you know pretty much everything and that your opinion is actual fact and the rest of us conservative hillbillies don't know squat.
You see, what we "get" is that there are some very bad people out there who will do us harm if they get the chance and all your liberal feel-good hugs and drum circles won't stop them. Good surveillance that can be nimble and quick when necessary and a strong, well trained military/FBI/CIA apparatus that can apprehend these fanatics BEFORE they do harm either here or abroad.

Do you actually think that we would waste time "spying" on regular people in the US? What benefit would that bring? "

dd wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:54 PM:

" AJ--I would have told Clinton to have at it if we were in the same boat. I have nothing to hide. I do not participate in illegal activities. Do you have something ti hide AJ? I am all for the government monitoring illegal activities. "

dd wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:31 PM:

" Oh yea--my real point, because I got caught up in your whiny little passages---how does the Patriot Act deny any citizen their rights? If you are suspected in any crime at any level, you will probably be investigated at some level. Is it your right to not be investigated? If you are participating in suspicious activities, I think not. "

dd wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:24 PM:

" Peter--We are a country of free will. Free will allows many different people to carry on a practice many different beliefs. That includes, burning our flag, and speaking out against our government. America protects the rights of even those who despise the very ideals it stand for. I think you are being a little over sensitive. The federal government does not have an interest in spying on anyone who is a law abiding citizen. If that were the case, wouldn't you think we'd hear alot more about it? So, take yourself by your frail little ego, wipe your tears away, and enjoy living in one of the only countries in the world where you can criticize anyone at any time for any reason without retaliation. "

AJ wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:18 PM:

" I'm sure all of you right-wing nutcases would have approved of giving Clinton these unprecedented powers, right?

International calls have always, AFAIK, been subject to tapping, so what is your point ms coulter?

RD, Dave, I'm sure you'll appreciate a presidency you do not support having these broad powers cause you have nothing to hide, right?

Sure..

You will just never get it. "

dd wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:01 PM:

" I am under the belief that the Partriot Act is like having a car with a really big engine. You don't have to use all of the power all of the time, but when it is appropriate, it is better to have it. Farmers Gal--Unless you know something I don't know, the federal government is not arbitrarily wiretapping the average Joe's phone. "

Dave R Ithaca, NY wrote on Jul 14, 2008 2:25 PM:

" Farmer gal, Unless you are involved in some sort of illegal activities, I don't think you should have to worry. "

rd wrote on Jul 14, 2008 10:52 AM:

" Farmer person, please explain what rights and privacy have been stripped from you. Please explain why the government would benefit from doing this.I am waiting! "

chris van note wrote on Jul 14, 2008 9:38 AM:

" "Warrantless Domestic Spying" Results in 15 Innocent Civilians Being Forced By Government Thugs into Helicopters and Spirited Away

The US was listening in as FARC leader Nancy Conde phoned Miami contacts asking them for satellite phones. The FBI arrested the contacts, then double-agented them and coerced them to put Conde in touch with a company which would deliver them their precious phones -- a front company manned by the FBI.

They got their phones -- all wiretapped up, of course.

FARC used them, not realizing all their communications were compromised.

This led to the liberation of the 15 long-held hostages.

I wonder if the freed hostages believe their civil rights were more compromised by the US government or the terrorist FARC army the left is so protective of. "

Farmer's Gal wrote on Jul 14, 2008 7:25 AM:

" Bull. The war is an excuse to strip citizen even further of our rights and privacy. "

rd wrote on Jul 13, 2008 2:05 PM:

" Peter, get a grip on life. We are at war and this legislation just might protect your right to write silly letters to the editor. "

Farmer's Gal wrote on Jul 13, 2008 12:48 PM:

" It absolutely does. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!