Fourth of July weekend is a busy weekend for tourists, and where better than central New York for summer boating enthusiasts?
With numerous lakes, the Erie Canal and three smaller canal ways, upstate New York welcomes more southern tourists than people may realize, particularly from Florida.
But the Erie Canal seems to be eating money.
It's been whispered that renovations and operational costs have reached more than $50 million annually.
The state recoups a large part of this from public money, primarily highway tolls.
This has sparked controversy among blue collar workers from downstate who travel the highways daily in expensive commutes to and from work.
In a struggling economy, it's a legitimate beef.
Though no one debates the historical significance of the Erie Canal, there is concern that the canal is not trafficked enough to be the responsibility of the state Thruway Authority.
Consider, New York ports no longer depend on the river system and downstate residents feel they have to foot the bill for wealthy Florida yachters.
Frankly, I'm not shedding any tears for downstate residents. When it comes to dollars and cents, the last nickel will always roll their way.
Besides which, New York City will never want for tourists; whereas upstate is constantly having to fight for funding to develop commercial tourism.
Then what is the solution? How can we preserve the history of the canals, develop tourism along the canals and maintain the canals, without constantly increasing highway tolls for downstate residents?
The answer is simple; the Erie Canal waterways need more federal funding. Is the Erie Canal any less significant than Mount Rushmore or the Statue of Liberty?
These sites seem more glamorous, mostly because of the way that they are marketed to tourists.
I think that the Erie Canal could be every bit as popular as the Grand Canyon if funds were available to build businesses and attractions along the waterways and lakes.
The returns of the investment would have a huge impact on upstate New Yorkers, where job growth is desperately needed.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
But the Erie Canal seems to be eating money.
It's been whispered that renovations and operational costs have reached more than $50 million annually.
The state recoups a large part of this from public money, primarily highway tolls.
This has sparked controversy among blue collar workers from downstate who travel the highways daily in expensive commutes to and from work.
In a struggling economy, it's a legitimate beef.
Though no one debates the historical significance of the Erie Canal, there is concern that the canal is not trafficked enough to be the responsibility of the state Thruway Authority.
Consider, New York ports no longer depend on the river system and downstate residents feel they have to foot the bill for wealthy Florida yachters.
Frankly, I'm not shedding any tears for downstate residents. When it comes to dollars and cents, the last nickel will always roll their way.
Besides which, New York City will never want for tourists; whereas upstate is constantly having to fight for funding to develop commercial tourism.
Then what is the solution? How can we preserve the history of the canals, develop tourism along the canals and maintain the canals, without constantly increasing highway tolls for downstate residents?
The answer is simple; the Erie Canal waterways need more federal funding. Is the Erie Canal any less significant than Mount Rushmore or the Statue of Liberty?
These sites seem more glamorous, mostly because of the way that they are marketed to tourists.
I think that the Erie Canal could be every bit as popular as the Grand Canyon if funds were available to build businesses and attractions along the waterways and lakes.
The returns of the investment would have a huge impact on upstate New Yorkers, where job growth is desperately needed.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 7 comment(s)
irritated wrote on Jul 13, 2008 7:13 AM:
blueyankee443 wrote on Jul 12, 2008 11:35 PM:
State of New York needs money:There are
so many laws on the WaterWays,who can h
onestly enjoy any kind of water activit
ies.Volunteers are supposed to make the
difference,and they told the state year
s ago,they could manage the WaterWay.T
he states need the money,because the Un
ions are crying,and the volunteers are
crying,as their compensation for such
free efforts are no longer given finani
cal breaks,which amount to anything.The
leaders of these Volunteers manage the
funds,so the innocent volunteer gets no
free breaks.The Canal could not be supp
orted in the 20th century,how is it goi
ng to be viable in the 21st,and 22nd.Th
ere appears to be a lot of bleeding hea
rts for the people whom have prospered
off of the Canals riches,and do not wis
h to see their Volunteer Coordinators
and the parties,with the Influential pe
ople of the State,to tell them "BRAVOS"
for doing a immaculate task,against suc
h odds.The World is starving,and the pr
ices have climbed.Why is a Canal so imp
ortant,to make more unacessable to the
public,with such high fees.(Stay on the
Thruway,its cheaper.The state is supposed to mannage both of these.Do th
e math. "
dan w wrote on Jul 12, 2008 1:13 AM:
I have taken a trip every year for the past 5 years. Try it you might like it "
brew1234 wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:13 AM:
GoodbyeCNY wrote on Jul 8, 2008 6:40 PM:
dan w wrote on Jul 8, 2008 1:21 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Jul 8, 2008 12:30 AM: