All patriots are applauding the great Supreme Court decision on guns Thursday. Now we should make it mandatory that every non-felon be forced to carry a gun.
I wish that the editor would restore the Two Cents column to print so that we can get more than the three people who spend hours expressing their opinion in the online version. The way it is now, it is remeniscent of state government: Dominated by three idiots in a room.
Unbelievable, those three letters in Wednesday's Citizen, as all three of the big leftists writing in your paper, promoted equal distribution of the wealth and other Communistic ideas. Are you sure they're not the same people?
The Tree of Life has to do with Eternal Life, so perhaps the reference should not be used to covet money or possessions.
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 48 comment(s)
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 30, 2008 5:43 PM:
movedsouth wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:03 PM:
chris van note wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:37 AM:
reasonable explaination. Oh how typical.
Lets see, as governor Bush successfully sponsored legislation for tort reform, increased education funding and set higher standards for schools. Also, Bush used a budget surplus to push through a $2 billion tax-cut plan, which was the largest in Texas history.
BTW, the whole AWOL thing was proven to be a hoax and Dan Rather lost his job over it. Try Googling the "Killian Documents".
Can you say Fail? "
Leon Kapowski wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:32 AM:
Most citizens that carry firearms, concealed or otherwise, do everything they can to avoid confrontation. You're insulting millions of honest, non-violent people by insinuating that just because they carry a gun, they're chomping at the bit to use it. It just isn't true.
"The rest of us are just waiting for the right circumstances to blow some poor slob away."
You might be, but most of the rest of us aren't, so don't project your instability on anyone else, it just doesn't hold true.
"Why don't we just strap on six shooters and meet on Genesee Street at high noon and shoot it out."
Another parroted argument... again, this doesn't happen.
"The constitution says you can bear arms to serve in a trained and regulated millitia."
Not really. Ask an English language expert about it, especially why they placed the commas where they did. And back then, "regulated" was defined as "having proper kit and provisions" or in the case of objects or machinery,
"properly maintained and kept in good repair". Not "controlled", "limited", or "restricted" as the word means today. "
AJ wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:24 AM:
" Oh AJ, how about 2 terms as gov. of Texas?
Why don't you tell us AJ of all the important experience that Obama has that qualifies him to be President?
Diplomatic, executive, military... "
Oh yeah, the governor of Texas position. You're not serious are you? (rhetorical question) Real important job there..Didn't do much of anything there except allowed the execution of mentally retarrded people.
You're gonna have to do better than that Chris.
Personally, I don't care much for Obama. I do not think he will live up to his rhetoric and will simply turn out to be another tool of the establishment, same as Hillary.
Then there was his military experience, where he went awol "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:09 AM:
BTW, thanks, AJ, for the link about Forefront and how it has worked its way into the human food chain and is poisoning people food -- in a nutshell for those who didn't follow the link:
An herbicide in Forefront (and some other preparations) is not OK for use on food crops, but has been used on grasslands later used for feeding cattle. The stuff kills off a lot of weeds without killing the grass. A year later, the grass is harvested as silage for dairy cows. The cows eat the silage, and produce manure, which was spread on fields where food craps were grown -- and caused the food to be deformed and poisoned -- a year later, and after passing through the cow, being spread, and taken up by plants. Dow has not yet recalled the product, they they admit to being the cause of the problem.
I am still wondering about the milk produced by those cows.... "
chris van note wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:08 AM:
Why don't you tell us AJ of all the important experience that Obama has that qualifies him to be President?
Diplomatic, executive, military... "
Bobbo wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:29 AM:
AJ wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:57 AM:
I'll ignore the rest of your post because it is nothing but ad hominem with absolutely no substance whatsoever, which is typical for you. "
cm wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:47 AM:
I dont know exactly whats available in Auburn but in my area we have the local health department where care is available and based on "a sliding scale for payment" we also have many FREE cancer organizations plus a hospital thats well known that offers care on sliding scale too.
I am almost certain that if NOT Auburn there has to be something in Syracuse.
In the future contact local organizations and they will point you into the right directions of needed care.
We also have free clinics open 2ce a week by doctors and nurses volunteering their time. Along with a 2ce a month dental clinic that aids no less than 300 people per month--all free! "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:46 AM:
I've also been an unemployed college graduate (with grad degrees) for a length of time (I couldn't even get temp work, as I was told repeatedly that I was overqualified), so I know how that can happen.
Bottom line is -- you are right. Things like that should not happen. It won't bring your friend back, but maybe you can take your distress over what happened and use that energy to work towards improving the system -- so that her death can serve as a motivator to help prevent the same thing happening to others.
My sympathies to you and your friend's family. "
sabrina5487 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:15 AM:
Shame on this country! "
chris van note wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:04 AM:
In “the matter of national security policy making.” Barack Obama hasn’t ever done anything.
In the matter of gauging your “opponents”, Obama wants to meet with them without preconditions despite having no national-security, military, or diplomatic experience.
Barack Obama hasn’t been on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Barack Obama hasn’t had any executive experience.
Barack Obama hasn’t commanded anything, in wartime or not.
Barack Obama hasn’t dealt with diplomats in any capacity at all.
Barack Obama hasn’t ordered the bombs to fall, although to be fair, he has associated himself with someone who has — William Ayers. "
AJ wrote on Jun 29, 2008 4:05 PM:
Home-Grown Veg Ruined by Toxic Fertiliser
by Caroline Davies
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/29/9966/ "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 29, 2008 9:24 AM:
excnyer wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:43 PM:
AJ wrote on Jun 28, 2008 7:32 PM:
FBI Data-Mining Slashed After G-Men Dis Congress
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/there-was-a-tim.html "
AJ wrote on Jun 28, 2008 7:26 PM:
" Well said QT and to add - I feel the only way anything can be done or changed is thru a collaborative effort of the people. But at times there is so much going on just in ones immediate armthrow, its difficult to even imagine "fixing" the larger picture. We are in a time when we need a superior leader for this country and we AGAIN are reduced to two 'car salesmen'. Neither of which holds any true compassion of really getting the country back on track. "
Well, there was Kucinich. But the corporate media refused to give him a serious platform on which to make his stances widely known, and actively worked to marginalize him and, and ultimately kicked him out of the debates. The reason is that there is a conflict of interests.
And now we have McKinney, who unfortunately doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell, since the media ignores/marginalizes her as well. Both McKinney and Kucinich have/had very well laid out and thoughtful platforms - it's just that corporations felt threatened by them, especially those engaged in war profiteering.
There are good candidates from time to time, unfortunately, unless one is paying attention, the best most people get of these are a very fleeting look.
Now, given how widespread the internet it, there is no excuse why people weren't/aren't aware of these candidates, except for willful ignorance. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 28, 2008 6:23 PM:
Can you repeat that, 1234567890, because I didn't understand a word of it. Well, OK, too many (innocent, civilian) Iraqis and Afghanis killed -- I agree. But re-duck-less? I guess "colution" means coalition. Please try again -- I think there's a message in there somewhere, maybe even one with which I'd agree, but I am stymied by your message -- there is a point at which inability to spell renders one incapable of communicating ideas. Not trying to be snorky, but I really can't make out more than a trace of what you are trying to say. "
excnyer wrote on Jun 28, 2008 4:01 PM:
cm wrote on Jun 28, 2008 3:13 PM:
most are hoping for a collaborative effort and a leader, BUT the facts are its all a wish, a dream, and mostly political hogwash!
The groups that seem to be really doing something are most of the NON-Profits..maybe our aid is best suited in those areas--even if it is a church and we dont believe in God.
The other day I read, in CA, Los Angeles county there were over 80,000 homeless,or living in their cars--that is double the population of Auburn!!
CA officials want to give tickets for these overnight parkers. My bet is it will be a church or several churchs opening thier lots.
I personally dont go to church every Sunday, but I enjoying aiding(making 200-300 homeless lunches),
and I give alot of credit to the people that do give up their time to help someone in need.
We have to be our own leaders and NOT wait for someone else to lead us!! "
1234567890 wrote on Jun 28, 2008 1:54 PM:
nature lover wrote on Jun 28, 2008 11:37 AM:
quiveringthigh wrote on Jun 28, 2008 10:39 AM:
" quiveringthigh wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:15 PM:
" AJ, it sucks to be all alone without Katl with a K, doesn't it? "
Doesn't bother me - I actually have to laugh knowing the collective IQ of my adversaries here barely gets into the double digits.
Please, QT, you're as bad as movedsouth - why don't you post something substantive? That's a rhetorical question of course - I know your head is pretty empty and you cannot even if you tried. I have yet to see even ONE post by you that has had ANY substance whatsoever - that is pretty common with people who have nothing to contribute to the discussion.
BTW, before you decide to criticize anyone for their spelling, you should first know what you're talking about, and second, know how to spell yourself. "
I spell very well, thank you very much. Empty head???????? Don't think so. I do post intelligent and fact based. Then there are times when I just want to light a fire under someone like you. Furthermore, I think bickering about politics is ignorant. To each their own. I have more important interests to me, than to quibble about politicians, not to mention they are basically car salesmen by trade.
Sorry to offend you, oh moronic one. Don't you ever have anything else to post about? Do you venture outside your house and see what color the sky is??? "
nature lover wrote on Jun 28, 2008 10:21 AM:
Queenie, why...
Queenie? u start right off the bat there AJ too funny...
The DC decision on handguns was granted for two reasons only and one of them was not the constitutional one regarding the right to bear arms against the state..so the constitution was not the issue that was upheld. As SD O'Connor says many judges are not represented by the law as written but rather by their interpretation or public/private swayings. (not verbatum...). "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:35 AM:
Yesterday there was an article on this site having to do with high gas prices keeping people from traveling. I sent in a response, but now can't find the article (was probably from the AP), so I don't know if it were posted or not.
Here it is again, somewhat out of context, but worth repeating, IMHO:
What's bad about Americans using less gas?
If we used trains to do the majority of cross-country shipping, we could save a lot more.
If we only shipped things across the country which we COULDN'T grow locally, we'd save even more -- and get fresher, healthier produce which wouldn't NEED to be gassed or genetically engineered to give it longer shelf life during the shipping.
Growing as much of your own as you can is good too -- more power to seed companies, and let's see more local seed companies and less power to national giants like Burpee.
I do see a point in that in the Middle Ages, ordinary people could not travel (much less relocate/move) out of their communities without the permission of their lord and master -- the nobility were better able to control the population this way. That's certainly not good.
But being forced to use fuel more efficiently is NOT A BAD THING.
People were forced to leave the countryside because cities sucked up all the jobs and production moved to the cities -- which were overcrowded, noisy, polluted and unhealthy -- still are. Once it was chamberpots emptied into streets already overflowing with horse droppings; now it's fumes from trucks and busses and noise pollution from so many people living practically on top of each other -- humans were not meant to live this way.
But since the advent of industrialized farming, it's not healthy to live in the countryside either, where your air is full of the toxic fumes from the spreading of liquid manure and the water supply is full of e-coli. Just heard today of a corporate agribusiness which shall remain nameless where they had out their heavy earth movers to fill in the channel where they had a thick spill of manure headed for a tributary of Salmon Creek -- for not the first time either. Now that they've filled it in so fast before it could be properly inspected, we'll never know if it actually reached the creek or not.
No sir, we are surrounded on all sides by toxins, carcinogens and other forms of pollution. Cutting back on driving to decease emissions can only be good. "
cm wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:33 AM:
Now think of that happening in the future???
We here have had many GUN DEBATES--
in my house guns are not allowed, and never will be! In a crisis everyone will react differently-I think most will freeze/be in shock and having a gun on a the top shelf of the closet would do you no good.
In recent paper, we have had 6 kids accidently shot with parents guns (they found & played with) VS. 1 homeowner protecting his property..FIVE have died (includes homeowner) and one is in hospital today.
Now Occassionally the homeowner does get the bad guy-but odds are not in favor of that.
It is my decision, of guns being a useless object unless I was into hunting--which I am not!
Todays world there is so much anger and hate--it scary thinking how many guns are in the wrong hands, let alone parents begging for laws to allow their 18yr old to have them in a class at school.
Along with knowing some 18yr old are still in high school !! "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:20 AM:
I don't have a magic answer to that, but I know the real reason we were guaranteed the right to bear arms was so we could overthrow our government should it become corrupt. That's the one argument you almost never see in the debate. I'm not suggesting revolution, just that we have a right to it as a citizenry should we deem it necessary, while our government, obviously, would prefer it not to be possible.
I try to be civil, but I get sucked down into lowly no-class behavior on occasion too. Some days it can be very tempting.... ;-) "
cm wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:14 AM:
I believe that: simply because no matter what, we all return--so if we havent busted up our computers in fits of anger--we are most likely not in the catagory of murder/death/kill. "
AJ wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:02 AM:
" AJ, it sucks to be all alone without Katl with a K, doesn't it? "
Doesn't bother me - I actually have to laugh knowing the collective IQ of my adversaries here barely gets into the double digits.
Please, QT, you're as bad as movedsouth - why don't you post something substantive? That's a rhetorical question of course - I know your head is pretty empty and you cannot even if you tried. I have yet to see even ONE post by you that has had ANY substance whatsoever - that is pretty common with people who have nothing to contribute to the discussion.
BTW, before you decide to criticize anyone for their spelling, you should first know what you're talking about, and second, know how to spell yourself. "
budobrubbie wrote on Jun 28, 2008 7:56 AM:
brew1234 wrote on Jun 28, 2008 2:26 AM:
cm wrote on Jun 28, 2008 1:06 AM:
you are wrong about anyone being Civil, you would trust having a gun...
Just because one is civil today doesnt mean they will be civil tomorrow! "
Andy B wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:36 PM:
budobrubbie wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:32 PM:
quiveringthigh wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:15 PM:
budobrubbie wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:11 PM:
Mr. King - I'm not a Liberal, and I didn't say ONLY LEO's or the military should own guns. I would trust some responsible citizens to own a gun, but not you folks. No offense, but given the right circumstances, most of you are nuts. The general public, Liberal, Conservative or Moderate, makes bad decisions every day. Add a gun to that equation and innocent people will die. I don't want you to shoot me just because I unintentionally cut you off in traffic. "
AJ wrote on Jun 27, 2008 9:36 PM:
" AJ you must have stock answers to criticism, let's see "you have a reading comprehension problem is either 1 or 2. "
Why is it you never have anything substantive to say, movedsouth? Challenge my facts, if you can. That you have a comprehension problem is all here as plain as day and you haven't a leg to stand on.
I'll make a deal with you though - I'll discuss the issues without ad hominem if you do as well - this goes for everyone, actually.
Queenie, why not provide a link with some attribution? I've heard that argument so many times it's tiring, and I would be suspect of anyone indicating it is an utter failure. Sounds to me like it is most likely a phony story. I would take the Canadian health care system over ours any day, from everything I've seen as it stands now.
Isn't UNITY grand? Talk about a bs staged bunch of crap! It was sickening!
Now, for anyone interested here is an internet radio stream which is going to be airing clips of the torture memo hearings - hopefully you can catch it...
(I'd be willing to bet little if anything has been discussed about the hearings in the corporate broadcast media, and what they may have discussed would be biased to the "torture is OK" side of things. Am I right?)
mms://wm3.spacialnet.com/novamradio55700 "
cm wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:59 PM:
So now guess what? several other companies want the same deal..
I say let them move and dont buy their what they are selling!! "
movedsouth wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:49 PM:
theking wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:45 PM:
theking wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:43 PM:
budobrubbie wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:21 PM:
Yeah, that's just what we need. Every self-righteous hothead who thinks he owns the highway taking pot shots at anyone who mistakenly cuts them off in traffic. The public has demonstrated that it has very poor judgement; just look who we elected President for the last eight years. Other than law enforcement or the military, there are very few members of society that should own a gun. "
movedsouth wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:13 PM:
AJ wrote on Jun 27, 2008 6:50 PM:
AJ wrote on Jun 27, 2008 6:42 PM:
I never said I was above being manipulated - you are right for once dd (whoa!!!), we are all manipulated by many different entities, people, institutions, etc. The trick is being able to recognize that fact. Good one DD, I'll give you credit for that - you actually said something intelligent!
I also never said that TV is totally useless. Again, people here have serious reading comprehension difficulties. My major point was that it DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE WHOLE PICTURE ON SERIOUS POLITICAL ISSUES, particularly where there is a glaring conflict of interest. Context is everything, and you'll get little of that from the corporate media.
Do you really think GE is going to allow a serious debate on its networks about nuclear energy or weapons proliferation, or the need for war, when they themselves are directly involved in and profiting from it?
Take the Iraq war as an example - how much has GE made of of the war? Why did they present "experts" that were pro-war 99% of the time in any serious discussion? (FAIR did a study on this BTW).
What I find curious here is that I haven't heard a "peep" about the "liberal" media in this thread. I should think that as "liberal" as many of you consider the media, you would have been agreeing with me more, albeit for different reasons. "
movedsouth wrote on Jun 27, 2008 6:33 PM:
movedsouth wrote on Jun 27, 2008 6:33 PM: