Estabrook: Stop leeching off social programs

By Carole Estabrook

Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:42 AM EDT

As graduation celebrations commence, one has to wonder what is in store for today's young people as they enter the workforce. Cayuga County's unemployment rate is up from April, reaching 4.9 percent at the end of May. Unemployment is also at 4.9 percent statewide, up from 4.2 percent at this time last year.
The government has tried to stimulate the economy, giving Americans a slight break on their taxes. The government even passed a law requiring all television stations to make the switch to digital, in the hope that HDTV sales will sky-rocket as computers did in the early 90s. But if the economy of central New York depends on television sales, I'm very concerned for the future.

Unemployment in Cayuga County has risen, despite significant growth in the often struggling manufacturing sector. With the economy in the toilet, you'd think that people would be lining up for these positions. But today more and more people seem to be leeching off social programs, too proud to work beneath their degree.

The reality is that the number of skilled workers has surpassed the number of available positions. So what is the solution? Well for starters, Cayuga County needs to be receptive to change.

I struggle with this myself. I wrote a few weeks back about how I hate to see cornfields replaced by soy beans, but it's good for the county. I hate to have to compete with tourists for parking spots and restaurant seating, but it's good for the county. If the county's economy can be restored by soybeans or tourism, why fight it?

Frankly, the biggest drain on the economy are the people who aren't working. If you flip through to the classifieds you won't find a blank page. Someone, somewhere in Cayuga County is looking for employees. And I'm equally sure that there is someone, somewhere in Cayuga County who is capable of handling the position but for whatever reason, doesn't want to.

Too many people take advantage of the system. If social programs were restructured to assist only those who are truly incapable of working, it would force people to get up off the sofa. Work equals money earned, money earned equals money spent, money spent spurs the economy and a healthy economy promotes job growth

In the meantime, my suggestion is to put pressure on our state representatives to examine social programs and who benefits. Now that Senator Clinton has suspended her campaign, it's time to turn her attention back to the struggling counties of central New York.

Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 15 comment(s)

ethan wrote on Jun 29, 2008 4:31 PM:

" If you are working for 7.50 a hr you can't afford the gas if you live any didtance from your work and IF you don't live on on bus route ...well ... a boat with out a paddle "

Unknown... wrote on Jun 28, 2008 9:54 PM:

" There's so much waste & corruption in the government that it probably wouldn't be too hard to reign things in & funnel some of that money into a special fund for the people that need it. But, I suppose I have a better chance of seeing God, before something like that happened!!! "

AJ wrote on Jun 28, 2008 8:08 AM:

" So what do you suggest, unknown?

My father died when I was young. Were it not for SS, we very well may have ended up living in the streets. There will always be abuses in the system, and it would be naive to think otherwise, but I think the abuses are overblown indeed. "

Unknown... wrote on Jun 27, 2008 6:08 PM:

" I thought that Social Security was set up to provide a retirement fund to people that, upon reaching retirement age, would have an income supplement to the retirement that their employers set up. But today there's all kinds of people tapped into it. I knew 2 kids that drew off it for years until they reached 18, and just blew all the money on crap, because their mother was stupid enough to give it to them. To me that was a total waste of taxpayer money. They could have saved it for a college fund, but it was long gone after they finished high school. And that's just a single instance. I'm sure there's 1000's more stories just like that. "

AJ wrote on Jun 27, 2008 2:40 PM:

" The Social Security fund would be solvent, were it not for the fact that the government (general fund) borrows from it constantly for other things, say like war, for instance, or to be able to provide tax breaks for the wealthy who do not need tax breaks.

Regarding the disabled, what agency would you propose help them? What do you think Social Security stands for?

BTW, does anyone know how many people are out of work in Auburn? My guess is that it is probably somewhere between 500 and a 1000. Not a good thing given that in Auburn there are only 50 jobs listed at the moment, and only a handful appear to pay that well.

Nice going, George. "

Unknown... wrote on Jun 27, 2008 7:40 AM:

" I don't deny that disabled people should be helped by the government, but how did it start coming out of the Social Security system?? It's not what it was set up for originally. It's no wonder that they keep telling us that it's about to go belly up, there's too many people sucking that dry too. "

brew1234 wrote on Jun 24, 2008 11:40 PM:

" If the minimum wage kept up with inflation since 1968 it should be $9.85 per hour. That is equivalent to the 1968 minimum wage of $3.15. The gap between the rich and poor gets wider and wider. In another 40 years we will all be on welfare except for the 5% that are rich. "

qwerty123 wrote on Jun 24, 2008 7:55 AM:

" "The government even passed a law requiring all television stations to make the switch to digital, in the hope that HDTV sales will sky-rocket as computers did in the early 90s."

As usual...Ms. Estabrook has her facts wrong.

Yes, Television stattions are being required to switch to a digital signal, but you do not have to buy a new TV.

These signals are digital...NOT HD. They are 2 different things. To get the digital signal with your current television, you will need a converter box. The government is giving $40 coupons for these boxes and you can get one for $49. You pay 9 bucks...not a new TV.

I think the dear Ms. Estabrook needs to learn a bit more before presenting a foolish opinion in a newspaper. "

AJ wrote on Jun 23, 2008 10:24 PM:

" Seems like Ms Estabrook needs an education.

While this was written 12 years ago and many of the statistics are outdated (most are FAR worse now), this otherwise paints a pretty good picture of things.

Class Warfare/Corporate Welfare
The Vanishing Middle Class
by Lynn H. Ehrle

http://www.consciouschoice.com/1995-98/cc095/classwarfare.html "

telldastory wrote on Jun 23, 2008 9:28 PM:

" Ms. Estabrook
You are forgetting that the vast majority of jobs available in this area do not pay a living wage OR offer benefits. What about the working poor? Jobs that pay $7.50-8.50 per hour even if both adults are working does not provide enough for a family. Thus they supplement with food stamps. There is no health insurance offered or it is offered at such a high rate it would eat one of those paychecks. Are you suggesting that lawmakers do away with Family/child health plus or NY Cares for small businesses?

Before you endorse sweeping change you should take into consideration that many people receiving benefits ARE working. If any change is to be made then instead of mandating ONLY those incapable of working get services (by the way that is why there is social security disability) maybe laws should change to provide assistance to the employers. Give them assistance with a living wage and benefits and there would be no more 'working poor'. "

AJ wrote on Jun 23, 2008 8:59 PM:

" I missed something you wrote at the end, telldastory, which I absolutely disagree with - corporations ALREADY have been given WAY too many concessions as it is, and they STILL will not pay a living wage. "

AJ wrote on Jun 23, 2008 8:53 PM:

" telldastory, thanks for reminding us of those facts - very important to remember indeed (I almost always forget to point those out), and I should know better.

Get a job at Walmart, they'll even help you fill out the government benefits paperwork! It is scandalous! "

telldastory wrote on Jun 23, 2008 8:23 PM:

" Ms. Estabrook
You are forgetting that the vast majority of jobs available in this area do not pay a living wage OR offer benefits. What about the working poor? Jobs that pay $7.50-8.50 per hour even if both adults are working does not provide enough for a family. Thus they supplement with food stamps. There is no health insurance offered or it is offered at such a high rate it would eat one of those paychecks. Are you suggesting that lawmakers do away with Family/child health plus or NY Cares for small businesses?

Before you endorse sweeping change you should take into consideration that many people receiving benefits ARE working. If any change is to be made then instead of mandating ONLY those incapable of working get services (by the way that is why there is social security disability) maybe laws should change to provide assistance to the employers. Give them assistance with a living wage and benefits and there would be no more 'working poor'. "

AJ wrote on Jun 23, 2008 6:35 PM:

" I am so tired of this insane argument that ALWAYS leaves out the OTHER side of WELFARE - the major corporations.

The TRUTH of the matter is is that IT IS THE CORPORATIONS that are the WORST offenders BY FAR and you STILL DON'T GET IT!!!

If every one who has a problem with welfare for those who abuse the system could get it through your heads that the BIGGEST problem is the billionaire crybaby businesses that drain FAR more of your money out of the system, and you focused your attention where it would really make a difference, maybe your tax bills could really drop.

Please stop blaming poor people!

And I often hear talk as if life is such a gravy train for those who are less fortunate that have to rely on the system for help, which is truly insane.

Regarding the unemployment figures, they haven't been accurate in decades, they have been changed at least two or three times in how they are compiled since Ronald Raygun became president, in order to mask the size of the problem and to limit benefits.

As for the number of jobs - you can usually figure there will be AT LEAST 10 applicants for every job listing.

Please get a clue - this whole debate is getting really tiring. "

sonofmaddog wrote on Jun 23, 2008 3:02 PM:

" i agree that these programs are meant for the truly needy but in rea life that is not always the case. we have in auburn a long time letter writer who is not yet of retirement age, is active in sports the year round and refuses to work for a living. what is even more incredulous is that he has the brazen audicity to whine that the government should give him more free money. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!