Ex-city employee still on payroll

By Christopher Caskey / The Citizen

Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:43 AM EDT

Michael Long is no longer working for Auburn. But the city will be paying Long, the former director of capital projects and grants, for another couple months.
According to City Manager Mark Palesh, Long will continue to be paid until he uses up the approximately 50 vacation days he had accumulated while working for the city. Long started working June 16 as city administrator of Poughkeepsie.

“People will do that, take their vacation time instead of a final check or something,” Palesh said Monday.

According to Palesh, the city does not have a single, uniform policy on allowing vacation days to accumulate.

Union contracts dictate how many days most city employees can save. There are five unions that represent city employees.

There is no set policy for people in management positions, such as Long, Palesh said.

According to the city budget, the director of capital projects and grants makes $77,799 for the 2008-2009 fiscal year.

Long worked for Auburn 27 years before ending his tenure as the person in charge of securing state and federal grants for the city. He also served as Auburn's interim city manager for about five months in 2006 and 2007.

Long took much of the blame in February when an audit revealed the city was unable to secure almost $1 million in funding for state and federal projects dating back to 1999 because of failure to file paperwork for application or follow up.

Long could not be reached for comment at his Poughkeepsie office. A city hall employee there stated that he was on a pre-planned vacation for the week.

Auburn City Councilor Thomas McNabb said Monday that when he worked for the city, there was a cap on the amount of vacation days he could save. He also said he remembers a city hall policy that put a similar limit on both union and managerial positions.

McNabb retired from the city in 1999 after working 26 years for the engineering department. While he said he was not aware of Long's vacation pay, he would like to see a unified policy that would limit all employees' vacation, sick leave and other extra pay.

“Everyone gets treated alike. It would be the same for union and management employees,” McNabb said.

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 11 comment(s)

horseradish wrote on Jun 25, 2008 8:39 AM:

" GoodbyeCNY: I have no problem with the budget failing, although I do find it hilarious given the circumstances.

As for working in the public sector, i do not. I work for a fairly large private firm and are packages work quite the same way. You see, when you have a good job with a good company, you get good benefits. you should try that sometime. "

horseradish wrote on Jun 25, 2008 8:38 AM:

" bizarro-world: no joke. why do you live in a city if you don't want to pay for city employees. you should live out in the country where township employees are not so many. although, there would be less people paying for those less people that are working. "

GoodbyeCNY wrote on Jun 25, 2008 6:59 AM:

" horsey is still in a state of severe agitation due to the consecutive failings of the Auburn School Board. That budget failed TWICE. Furthermore, horsey thinks all school/city/county employees do a great job and not only deserve their wages, they should continue getting raises above and beyond both the pricate sector and rate of inflation. i suspect horsey does not have a job where performance matters. "

bizzaro-world wrote on Jun 24, 2008 6:26 PM:

" ok horseradish...he he he..very witty response. Which city dept do you & your's work for. Rediculous, I almost decided to not waste the keystrokes, but if that is your formal response to the awful state of affairs then I pity you & yours. Go back to sleep now. "

realist wrote on Jun 24, 2008 4:44 PM:

" easy policy for vacation time.. use it or lose it.. enough said "

horseradish wrote on Jun 24, 2008 2:32 PM:

" bizarro world, if you don't like paying taxes for city employees, WHY DO YOU LIVE IN A CITY?! "

Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 24, 2008 1:58 PM:

" I dunno -- a lot of employers have "use it or lose it" policies. I know I worked at a former job where if you did not use your vacation time by the end of their fiscal year, the slate was wiped clean and you started over fresh for the new year.

Of course, we were apprised of that condition the day we were hired -- it wouldn't be fair to this guy who saved up all those years with the understanding he could take the time at the end. "

bizzaro-world wrote on Jun 24, 2008 1:56 PM:

" Not irresponsible reporting...just a wake-up call to taxpayers, who themselves have wages & benefits far below the HIGHEST PAID CITY EMPLOYEES PER CAPITA IN THE NATION. This is so rediculous. The shangra la is no longer. Period. The blissfull downright criminal behavior that was acceptable because taxpayers were simply unaware is OVER. GET USED TO IT. Work for your pay, produce for your pay, be judged DAILY on your performance. EARN a living instead of collecting "work-fare" from taxpayers. Just like the reality us taxpayers live in. "

anya wrote on Jun 24, 2008 1:38 PM:

" If Mr. McNabb actually knew what he was talking about he would know that, yes, there is a cap on how much vacation time a person can carry over from one year to the next. The days Mr. Long has accumulated were the vacation days alloted to him at the beginning of the year in accordance with his time in service. If Mr. Long had stayed to the end of the year he would have used, and been payed for while not working, this vacation time or he would have lost it. His absence and being paid now is equivalent to him being on vacation. He earned those days, they are his & he is being recompensed for them. This is not a case of someone being paid for doing nothing so why is the Citizen trying to stir up a hornet's nest? Irresponsible reporting IMO. Nothing to see here people, move on. "

horseradish wrote on Jun 24, 2008 1:03 PM:

" the guy worked for the city and community for 27 years, and he accumulated those days off BECAUSE HE DECIDED TO WORK INSTEAD.

if he hadn't had the opportunity to save them throughout his time in auburn, he would have used them before the year ran out, like any sane person would do.

WHAT A NON STORY! give the guy a break. "

interesting wrote on Jun 24, 2008 12:27 PM:

" Capping the time employees can take after termination may help but if they are given a lot of benefit time to use in the first place, it makes it difficult for the employee to actually take the time while they are working. Was this guy taking vacation time each year he worked or did he just save it all up? If he couldn't take it when he wanted to take it, then the city can't cap it and say sorry, even though you earned it, we aren't letting you take it. Maybe they should allow employees the opportunity to buy back vacation time at the end of each calendar year so it doesn't cost as much years later as their salaries increase. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!