AUBURN - For the Auburn Enlarged City School District, the second time wasn't the charm as district voters overwhelmingly defeated its proposed 2008-09 school budget Tuesday.
Chet Susslin / The Citizen
Auburn Enlarged City School District Board of Education member Michael Stearns rubs his eyes while, from left, Ginny Kent, Coylynn Cator, David Lansford and Charlie Cator look on. The school budget, originally voted down on May 20, was defeated Tuesday by a much wider margin.
Auburn Enlarged City School District Board of Education member Michael Stearns rubs his eyes while, from left, Ginny Kent, Coylynn Cator, David Lansford and Charlie Cator look on. The school budget, originally voted down on May 20, was defeated Tuesday by a much wider margin.
According to unofficial results, the proposed budget of $66,490,371 with a tax levy increase of 3.28 was voted down during a re-vote by a margin of 264 - 1,877 yes to 2,141 no - with 154 affidavit ballots outstanding.
Voters defeated the same budget May 20 by just three votes, 1,414-1,411.
Superintendent J.D. Pabis voiced his frustration over the defeat, maintaining the budget allowed for smooth operations in education.
“I believe strongly that it was a fiscally sound and fiscally responsible budget, a budget that could offer a good educational program,” he said.
Huddled around an easel that posted the voter returns in the hallway of the district office, district officials and board members silently studied the returns, trying to take it all in.
Board member Michael Stearns rubbed his eyes in disbelief while colleague Ginny Kent cradled her head in her left fist.
Board President David Lansford said he was disappointed in the outcome.
While the community has spoken, he said Albany is to blame for the difficulties local districts face when trying to maintain quality education without overburdening the taxpayers.
“The schools get beat up because the state has not restructured its education financing,” he said. “It comes down to the local people and they vote no on a perfectly legitimate budget, which is the best they've seen in five years. They are fed up with taxes and the school district budget is the way they can take it out.”
District officials repeatedly called the proposed budget - marked by a 4.91 percent increase in spending over the previous year - a maintenance budget, devised to keep educational programs and faculty at current levels. The only staffing change the budget included was hiring a new custodian.
Following the budget defeat on May 20, board members opted to put the original budget for a re-vote in the hopes that, after engaging in a vigorous marketing strategy, the community would see it as fiscally responsible and educationally sound.
Moving forward, the district must now turn to its contingency budget, which is subject to state mandates. There is a mandatory cap on spending, the district cannot purchase any new equipment and employees that are unaffiliated with the district and are not part of a collective bargaining unit cannot receive salary increases.
For Auburn, the contingency budget caps spending at 3.97 percent with a $267,070 reduction in equipment purchases and $326,874 reduction in programming, which may include the custodian position, transportation and field trips, athletics and club activities, the elementary summer school, summer curriculum work and staff development.
Pabis said these cuts influence, but do not immediately affect, classroom academics.
The board will meet at 5:30 p.m. today at the Harriet Tubman Administrative Building to officiate the results of the vote. In that meeting and in the coming weeks, the board will deliberate and discuss what these reductions will look like.
“We've got to keep the integrity of education intact,” he said.
For Auburn resident Robert Lalonde, voting no on the budget was his way to voice his objections to new taxes.
“With the economic conditions the way they are today, it just seems like every year, 'let's just add $2 million or $3 million more and to hell with the taxpayer,'” he said after voting at West Middle School Tuesday.
But Craig Wright believed the tax increase was reasonable.
“I think it's a good budget,” the Auburn resident said after voting. “I think it's in line with what we can afford. I don't think it's overburdening the taxpayer this time. I guess people have to realize that, just like our gas, food, everything, is going up, it's also going up for the school district.
“Everyone blames the teachers, saying they get paid too much, but (school districts) have other expenses,” he said. “It's just a fact of life.”
Staff writer Alyssa Sunkin can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 239 or alyssa.sunkin@lee.net
Voters defeated the same budget May 20 by just three votes, 1,414-1,411.
Superintendent J.D. Pabis voiced his frustration over the defeat, maintaining the budget allowed for smooth operations in education.
“I believe strongly that it was a fiscally sound and fiscally responsible budget, a budget that could offer a good educational program,” he said.
Huddled around an easel that posted the voter returns in the hallway of the district office, district officials and board members silently studied the returns, trying to take it all in.
Board member Michael Stearns rubbed his eyes in disbelief while colleague Ginny Kent cradled her head in her left fist.
Board President David Lansford said he was disappointed in the outcome.
While the community has spoken, he said Albany is to blame for the difficulties local districts face when trying to maintain quality education without overburdening the taxpayers.
“The schools get beat up because the state has not restructured its education financing,” he said. “It comes down to the local people and they vote no on a perfectly legitimate budget, which is the best they've seen in five years. They are fed up with taxes and the school district budget is the way they can take it out.”
District officials repeatedly called the proposed budget - marked by a 4.91 percent increase in spending over the previous year - a maintenance budget, devised to keep educational programs and faculty at current levels. The only staffing change the budget included was hiring a new custodian.
Following the budget defeat on May 20, board members opted to put the original budget for a re-vote in the hopes that, after engaging in a vigorous marketing strategy, the community would see it as fiscally responsible and educationally sound.
Moving forward, the district must now turn to its contingency budget, which is subject to state mandates. There is a mandatory cap on spending, the district cannot purchase any new equipment and employees that are unaffiliated with the district and are not part of a collective bargaining unit cannot receive salary increases.
For Auburn, the contingency budget caps spending at 3.97 percent with a $267,070 reduction in equipment purchases and $326,874 reduction in programming, which may include the custodian position, transportation and field trips, athletics and club activities, the elementary summer school, summer curriculum work and staff development.
Pabis said these cuts influence, but do not immediately affect, classroom academics.
The board will meet at 5:30 p.m. today at the Harriet Tubman Administrative Building to officiate the results of the vote. In that meeting and in the coming weeks, the board will deliberate and discuss what these reductions will look like.
“We've got to keep the integrity of education intact,” he said.
For Auburn resident Robert Lalonde, voting no on the budget was his way to voice his objections to new taxes.
“With the economic conditions the way they are today, it just seems like every year, 'let's just add $2 million or $3 million more and to hell with the taxpayer,'” he said after voting at West Middle School Tuesday.
But Craig Wright believed the tax increase was reasonable.
“I think it's a good budget,” the Auburn resident said after voting. “I think it's in line with what we can afford. I don't think it's overburdening the taxpayer this time. I guess people have to realize that, just like our gas, food, everything, is going up, it's also going up for the school district.
“Everyone blames the teachers, saying they get paid too much, but (school districts) have other expenses,” he said. “It's just a fact of life.”
Staff writer Alyssa Sunkin can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 239 or alyssa.sunkin@lee.net
Citizen
Hot Jobs
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 27 comment(s)
justventing wrote on Jun 19, 2008 10:54 AM:
forrest wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:20 AM:
james_13021 wrote on Jun 19, 2008 5:45 AM:
I would have like to help the my kids out and voted yes, but I keep seeing my generaion keep paying for the problems created by my parents and grandparents! Shame on the older generation, now we have to find ways to support ourselves and children, while paying for your over expenditures!!! It's criminal what the older generation has done to younger generations...they just don't think nor care about (even if they say they do, actions speak louder!) "
pentangelli wrote on Jun 19, 2008 5:41 AM:
ethan wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:21 PM:
There are many items in a budget that have to included,BUT all schools need to show the people where the money is going to ..just not administrative cost @ $$$$$ or educational cost.Thats wrong. BREAK IT ALL DOWN. How much money is really in the slush fund(yes schools still have this ,its just hidden) Every Employee should pay a good portion of the medical,dental,eye insurance. Cut cost on NON Educational items.CUT OFFICE Items. I will even offer to go in and show them how to make cuts , been doing it for over 30 years. "
nature lover wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:03 PM:
vic wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:27 PM:
Cayresident- I don't know what you are smoking, but teachers work way more than a 6 hour day. "
Unknown... wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:21 PM:
From where you sit, you really haven't got the whole picture on what is going on here. You really need to live it before you can make those kinds of statements. We have been paying all kinds of increases in taxes over the years, and just recently, the administration hired 18 new mid management positions. All this was aimed at getting the drop out numbers lowered, and increase the graduate numbers, none of which has happened. So are we supposed to keep throwing money at this problem?? It really doesn't make sense. We have Ciriculum advisors. Our teachers hold Masters Degrees. Do they really need advisors?? No. Just another waste of taxpayer money. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't make judgements on us, please. Good luck in school, and reconsider your decision not to come here to live. It really is a nice place to live. "
tome8689 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:05 PM:
Disgusted wrote on Jun 18, 2008 5:36 PM:
And as far as bloated pay rolls...teachers are required to have master's degrees in this state. Considering that, there's nothing bloated about the wages teachers earn.
This whole "us and them" attitude concerning the School Board is ridiculous. It's a volunteer activity that consumes a lot of their time. The notion that they're this elite secretive group of people who some how get their jollies from making people pay more in taxes is utterly moronic.
I'm a college student, who until hearing the news of the budget failing, seriously looked forward to returning to Auburn to start a family. After witnessing these horribly backwards attitudes towards public education, I have to seriously reconsider that.
The only people that I have less respect for than those that voted to deny children a proper registration are the thousands of registered voters that didn't get out and vote. "
guesswho wrote on Jun 18, 2008 4:44 PM:
mdean wrote on Jun 18, 2008 4:31 PM:
blooms wrote on Jun 18, 2008 3:37 PM:
justventing wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:43 PM:
The Truth wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:24 PM:
Start running the district like a private sector company and you will find all sorts of cash available. "
tome8689 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:11 PM:
GoodbyeCNY wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:08 PM:
mrfed3 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:05 PM:
Andy b wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:44 PM:
Andy b wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:41 PM:
union wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:19 PM:
cayresident wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:06 PM:
marsha wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:03 PM:
guesswho wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:52 PM:
marsha wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:41 PM:
Unknown... wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:39 PM:
mrfed3 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:16 PM: