I have to agree that Auburn should fix what they have. That is exactly what the Auburn school board is trying to do.
We need to fix our schools and the crumbling Holland Stadium. By adding the turf field to the stadium, it will enhance our school and our community. Auburn is far from being the mostly run-down, broken outfit. The whole community should take pride in our student athletes, no matter where they play. They are a great bunch of kids!
As for the softball fields at Herman Avenue School, they are owned and maintained by the City of Auburn.
Laura Clary
Auburn
Laura Clary
Auburn
As for the softball fields at Herman Avenue School, they are owned and maintained by the City of Auburn.
Laura Clary
Auburn
Laura Clary
Auburn

Citizen
Hot Jobs
Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 17 comment(s)
cm wrote on Apr 25, 2008 10:42 AM:
I also agree that the band practicing on pavement can be HOT on certain days, BUT we all know the facts are the board cannot pay for bussing to home games NOW for the band -they certainly wont pay for bussing for band or any sports teams to Holland simply for PRACTICE in the future!
There is no reason for the band to be on pavement anyways when Auburn High has LAND--my son teaches marching band here and they practice on the grassy area next to the band room and WHEN available the football field.
which brings on another point-who gets first dibs on Holland? Games over practices, BUT which games? And WHERE will the others practice or play? ON the OTHER MANY RUN DOWN FIELDS????? "
tlb4 wrote on Apr 25, 2008 8:51 AM:
brew1234 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 11:51 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 11:47 PM:
And Karl, haven't I made the point that the savings of lower maintenance costs and increased use and rental revenues would offset replacement costs. And before the field needs replacing start a new round of fund raisers to pay for it. You have 10 years to prepare for that. If school budgets get tight and the taxpayers have had enough then all sports budgets should be funded by user fees. The school system should only pay for salaries of coaches. Sports boosters should be raising funds for athletic budgets full time. It would free up more funds for education without increased taxes. Oh, Oh, got to go, this is looking like a post from FG. "
cm wrote on Apr 24, 2008 10:25 PM:
All Auburn students including Phys. Ed. classes ,and athletes ?????
NOT all will get use out of turf, thats a total lie. Do they plan on bussing all the PhysED classes to Holland? They cant even bus the band right now for home games.
Even Brew said on last discussion Turf is for football, NOT all sports.
I agree Holland needs work, and so does ALL the other school fields. Why favor just one?
As for lead-well there is only "small" amounts in a super tiny Polly Pocket toy too-but they are off the shelf! "
tlb4 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 4:09 PM:
karl wrote on Apr 24, 2008 3:43 PM:
brew and tlb4, because we Auburn taxpaters are going to get stuck with the bill for replacement 10 years down the road.
NO NO NON NONNONONONNONONONONONONONONO!!!! "
karl wrote on Apr 24, 2008 3:41 PM:
" This issue is D_E-A-D as far as I'm concerned.
NO TURF!
NO TURF!
NO, NO, NO TO TURF!!!!!! "
Once again.... "
tlb4 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 3:04 PM:
You are absolutely correct. Cement and foundation work is part of the renovation project. It is not "just turf" "
brew1234 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 2:02 PM:
tlb4 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 2:02 PM:
tlb4 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 1:54 PM:
I commend MR. Leogrande for keeping his word. Thank You sir. "
vinmeister1 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 1:52 PM:
tlb4 wrote on Apr 24, 2008 1:41 PM:
hilltop wrote on Apr 24, 2008 1:39 PM:
karl wrote on Apr 24, 2008 1:11 PM:
NO TURF!
NO TURF!
NO, NO, NO TO TURF!!!!!! "
cm wrote on Apr 24, 2008 12:37 PM: