This Earth Day, Americans will be talking about ways to combat global warming: hybrid cars, energy-efficient light bulbs, and other means of lightening our “carbon footprint.” But what about switching to a meatless diet?
As a dietitian, I know that vegetarian diets benefit us as much as the planet. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations released a report in 2007 showing that farmed animals are a top contributor to today's serious environmental problems, including greenhouse gases. Reducing meat consumption could help slow global warming. A vegetarian diet would also help slow rates of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease that are climbing throughout the world as more and more countries “Westernize” their diets.
Studies have shown that people who follow a plant-based diet are slimmer than meat eaters and have less risk of the chronic illnesses that plague the tens of millions of Americans who follow a meat-heavy diet. Filling up on fruits, vegetables and other tasty vegetarian foods will take some pressure off the Earth - as well as our bodies.
Susan Levin
Washington, D.C.
Levin, R.S., R.D. is staff dietitian for the Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine
Studies have shown that people who follow a plant-based diet are slimmer than meat eaters and have less risk of the chronic illnesses that plague the tens of millions of Americans who follow a meat-heavy diet. Filling up on fruits, vegetables and other tasty vegetarian foods will take some pressure off the Earth - as well as our bodies.
Susan Levin
Washington, D.C.
Levin, R.S., R.D. is staff dietitian for the Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine
Citizen
Hot Jobs
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 15 comment(s)
Leon Kapowski wrote on Apr 16, 2008 8:44 AM:
I imagine it would, and I'd be all for it! Just an example... soda isn't a staple of my diet (nor should it be of anyone's), but have you ever had a real Dr. Pepper made with cane sugar instead of corn syrup? Only one place left to get it: http://www.dublindrpepper.com/
I drink about three sodas a month, so they have to count! Jones Soda is another that switched to cane sugar away from the cheap and physiologically toxic corn syrup trash. I wish more food companies would do that. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 16, 2008 7:28 AM:
(Maybe if we could convince only those growing corn for "high fructose corn syrup" to switch to corn for ethanol, and cut that corn syrup garbage out of so many of our foods, it would work out fine!) "
genegirl59 wrote on Apr 15, 2008 6:57 PM:
AJ wrote on Apr 15, 2008 3:33 PM:
Anyhow, I just wanted to make a comment on "energy efficient" light bulbs (since they were touched). While it is true they will save energy in the long run, we are also trading one problem for another, and that is mercury waste disposal from the things.
I actually went and bought several of them a number of years back, only to notice later that there was a warning regarding their disposal because of the mercury. As if we don't already have enough in the environment. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 15, 2008 11:02 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 15, 2008 10:58 AM:
The human body was meant to eat meat. You CAN get fairly good nutrition as a vegetarian if you really work at it, but you are working against your body's natural nature.
The problem is in the production of meat -- the hormones/steroids, the antibiotics, the disgusting and inhumane conditions under which they are raised all contribute to unhealthy meat. It may sound silly, but an unhappy animal will release different chemicals in its body than a happy animal, making the meat more acidic and full of things that aren't as good for us -- and that's on top of the chemicals and drugs deliberately injected into the animals.
The culprit here is corporate FACTORY farming. They like to go around saying factory farming is more efficient -- but it isn't!
For example: A factory farm can sell their milk for $16 a hundred weight and still make a profit -- because they get the huge subsidies from the government. The little farms have to be three times as efficient just to stay afloat, because they don't get those subsidies and they'd tank if they could only get $16 a hundredweight for milk. A small farm needs and deserves about $30 a hundredweight for their milk -- it's what the corporate guys are getting if you add in the subsidies.
A lot of small farms have gone under because of this unfair system -- that's only one way the big corporate places drive the little farms out of business. It's NOT that factory farms are more efficient, it's that they are subsidized by the government -- out of our pockets.
[And all the while, they are the biggest polluters of our lakes and releasing all kinds of toxins into the air as well.]
Think about it: We ARE already paying $4-$5 a gallon for milk; we just don't notice it because a chunk of it is coming out of our pockets in taxes that go into government subsidies to artificially keep down the price of milk. It costs us either way, and this way also aids the big farms drive all the little ones out of business.
Global warming is real -- ask any polar bear -- but not eating meat is NOT the answer to solve it. Industry which has flagrant disregard for how their production methods destroy the enviromnent is where we need to start -- along with the inadequate, ineffectual and seldom rigorously applied "regulations" on industrial pollution.
BTW, I was recently at a meeting of milk-producing farmers from 3 states where I heard some of the truly disgusting details about meat production in huge corporate factory processing firms in the midwest -- from an animal weighing a ton or more, the left-over bone matter is only about the size of a loaf of bread -- some places still use "extruders" (no longer sold but still in operation -- must be grandfathered in) which grind up every bit of the animal -- bones, cartilege (sp?), brains, organs, everything -- for hamburger, then all the fluids which are squeezed out in this chopping process get dumped right back in and the meat is sold to schools and old people's homes or other institutional kitchens. Yuck.
I am so glad I can get my meat from a local guy, slaughtered by a local guy, processed locally where I can go watch them do it if Ilike, with just the good healthy meat included.
I don't think I will ever eat "store-boughten" hamburger again -- but I am still and will always be a meat-eater. "
Leon Kapowski wrote on Apr 14, 2008 3:28 PM:
In my opinion, meat can be a good part of a healthy diet, I don't believe it's meat alone that makes all those obese people obese and causes all of those health problems, and I think it's highly disingenuous to state so. Sugar, added (sometimes engineered) fats, and the use of high fructose corn syrup in EVERYTHING is more of a problem than meat, if you ask me. "
MISSEY1941 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 2:32 PM:
Pollution from factories.Cutting the rain forest= Global Warming. "
hilltop wrote on Apr 14, 2008 2:26 PM:
Hillbilly wrote on Apr 14, 2008 1:44 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Apr 13, 2008 11:19 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Apr 13, 2008 9:31 PM:
Hillbilly wrote on Apr 13, 2008 3:26 PM:
However Karl, if you wish keep eating your 95% vegetarian diet that would be your choice. But, I would not be telling other they are sheep and part of the herd anymore not eating your 95% Girllie-Man diet. "
karl L wrote on Apr 13, 2008 1:01 PM:
On the other hand, vegetable protein is the easiest to process--in and out of your system in a flash--which keeps your insides cleaner and less prone to disease.
One thing I have found remarkable--since cutting 95% of red meat out of my diet(except for an occasional venison burger) my taste for it has changed considerably. I can no longer stomach steak or roast beef--it tastes bad to me, and upsets my digestion.
I eat a lot more stir-fry vegetables and rice, and feel better for it. "
Hillbilly wrote on Apr 13, 2008 9:37 AM: