The man in Syracuse who was forced to take matters into his own hands and attack the burglars of his car with a golf club is a hero, and should be treated as such, just as Bernard Goetz and Joe Horn are heroes of America.
Another pit bull attacked its owner; when are people going to learn? Pit bulls belong in the same category as lions and tigers and should be kept in cages so they can't get at people.
Why can't the city of Auburn take the civil service commission to court to resolve the lateral transfer issue?
If the artificial turf is so great, how come the Alliance Stadium took it out of their field and started with grass again?
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.

Citizen
Hot Jobs
Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 35 comment(s)
MISSEY1941 wrote on Apr 15, 2008 3:53 PM:
cm wrote on Apr 15, 2008 8:22 AM:
Turf is like the presidental elections more blah blah blah. "
anonymous wrote on Apr 15, 2008 7:44 AM:
sonofmaddog wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:09 PM:
quiveringthigh wrote on Apr 14, 2008 6:54 PM:
Can we all stop the Turf talk? It makes for boring readings. "
karl L wrote on Apr 14, 2008 1:54 PM:
This weekend, a rider just landed a double-backflip on a motorcycle--where's the story?
There are motocross races taking place every Sunday where heroic battles are fought and triumphantly won by riders who don't use steroids, don't b!tch and whine about their contracts, and don't spit at or flip off their fans. "
ameripie55 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:45 AM:
richard102167ny wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:04 AM:
raywa9 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 10:49 AM:
forrest wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:25 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 14, 2008 8:42 AM:
Some govt agency tilled sludge (human sewage waste solids) into the lawns at homes of urban poor families in Baltimore to see if it might mitigate the effects of lead in their environments (areas were lots of lead paint has been used in the past).
No follow-up testing of the health of people living in those homes has been carried out as far as the article writer knew.
The scary thing about sludge is that it is only tested for 9 heavy metals before being declared "safe" when there are hundreds of known dangerous and potentially dangerous contaminants in sewage -- we've been hearing recently about the stuff in our water containing pharmaceuticals, cleaning products, diseases, carcinogens, anything and everything that gets flushed -- this is solid part of the same stuff.
Questionably high rates of several of the heavy metals for which they do test are allowed, and they don't even test any other dangerous contaminants, much less do they have any idea of the interactions of various contaminants with each other or with other things spread on farm fields or in the environment in general.
This sludge stuff ("biosolids") is getting spread not only on these lawns, but on farm fields where they grow food -- right here in the Auburn area. If I told which farm(s) I know for sure are using it, The Citizen wouldn't publish my comments, but I can say there are farm(s) within minutes of downtown Auburn where they are spreading human waste on agricultural fields.
Here's one article I found which was a bit easier to read than the more detailed info you can dig through at the Cornell Waste Management site (which I always take with a grain of salt given how prejudiced Cornell is towards corporate farming):
http://www.foodandsocietyfellows.org/library/uploadedFiles/Taking_It_Slow_on_Sludge.htm
It's in YOUR environment too, city dwellers -- in your air, water, soil and now in your food as well. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 14, 2008 7:55 AM:
Thanks, Angmom -- a little gleam of the positive among the grumbles! (Mea culpa as well) "
anonymous wrote on Apr 13, 2008 10:14 PM:
Unknown... wrote on Apr 13, 2008 8:45 PM:
ANGMOM3 wrote on Apr 13, 2008 5:49 PM:
Jim wrote on Apr 13, 2008 1:25 PM:
1. The budget you will vote on in May is the district's annual operating budget. This budget contains the funds to educate and operate the district. It is not a capital project. The turf project is not included in the May budget vote.
2. The capital project will be voted on separately - I think I read that vote will be in June. That is the vote that includes the turf.
3. The private funds being raised for the turf is intended to cover the local share of the project only. The state will still pay the bulk of the cost for the turf. My understanding is about half of the local share has been raised to date.
4. If you vote down the capital project, the state funds targeted for Auburn will be redirected to another project in New York state. So your state tax dollars can be spent here in Auburn or in some other district in the state. It's your decision.
I'll be voting yes in May and I'll vote yes in June. I'm not a big fan of turf but I can't abide my state tax dollars being spent in another community when we can keep them right here in town. Voting no simply because of turf is cutting off your nose to spite your face. "
Hillbilly wrote on Apr 13, 2008 12:58 PM:
vic wrote on Apr 13, 2008 10:40 AM:
justaround wrote on Apr 13, 2008 10:24 AM:
anonymous wrote on Apr 13, 2008 9:48 AM:
brew1234 wrote on Apr 12, 2008 11:35 PM:
excnyer wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:36 PM:
Great post....give Buffy a hug for me!
"
quiveringthigh wrote on Apr 12, 2008 8:29 PM:
AJ wrote on Apr 12, 2008 7:43 PM:
Is this not a fair question? "
karl L wrote on Apr 12, 2008 4:21 PM:
I DOES come down to the owners and the upbringing. If an owner is negligent in the dog's early life, and doesn't conscientiously train the dog to be socialized and friendly, they WILL tend toward more violence than some breeds. But that can be prevented by training.
One of the problems is that some people who should never own a dog in the FIRST place raise them as some silly and pathetic pseudo-representation of their shallow masculinity. "
quiveringthigh wrote on Apr 12, 2008 12:07 PM:
Who is the moron that knows nothing about the APBT breed?? I had a girlfriend that bred them. She also shows them. I have shown ABPT's for 2 years. They are in the UKC registry. I own a champion pit and she has been temperment tested. The only fierce things about her are her tounge and her tail. And speaking of UKC dog shows, I have never seen any of them fight while being judged, and they are roughly 8 feet apart. The people at the shows are responsible and know how to handle their dogs. Besides the ABPT, their are other dogs being shown, such as, Jack Russel Terriers, Golden Retrievers and I knew a women the was showing Afghans. The nosiest, feistiest ones were the JRT's. I have seen them fight amongst themselves, couple times the owners had to separate them. But, if you know JRT's, they are very high strung and sometimes very aggressive.
You people that hear these "horror stories" of these "flash Eating" Pitbulls are nothing short of ignorant. I am not saying that Pit's are NOT bred for fighting. To some, there is BIG money in it. I am totally against it. But there are some breeders aka "Puppy Mills" that bred litter after litter for money and money only. Well guess who buys a lot of these dogs??? Give up?? The fighting community. Sometimes they will send a Decoy family to purchase a dog. They will act like it is going to a good home. Well, guess what, they will exchange the dog to the criminal for cash, and the dog is trained to fight. When we would have a litter, which was rare. My ex would only breed to better the breed. This includes correcting faults that would make the dog be more competitive in conformation events. So, part of her job would be researching either stud or dam through their papers. Seeing what kind of blood , number of Champions, other details. Once she found what she was looking for she would have a breeding. There would be vet checks, proof of temperment testing and her interacting with the potential stud or dam. There would be a week of conception, usually 3 "ties". She cared for the dam (if it was in our house). She is a vet tech, so she would watch the vitals and overall health of the Mom. Babies were born and she checked them at birth and everyday for the next 6 weeks. When it came time to sell them, she would interview the buyers if she didn't know them. This included a questionaire and visit to their house. She also had them sign releases that they would not be used for fighting. Once the pups were with their new owner, she would make a stop to see how things are going. There are a few breeders like that.
That's enough about my ex. God, who did post that stupid statement????
Anyways, their are other dogs that should be handled like lions and tigers. Those are the ones that are not raised in loving homes. Every breed has it's share of horror stories, but it's the Yankee Terrier that gets the bad rap. I remember when it was the German Shepherd and the Doberman Pinscher. Those dogs are very good man eaters if they are trained that way.
Once again STUPID PEOPLE are breeding. "
vic wrote on Apr 12, 2008 11:45 AM:
chris van note wrote on Apr 12, 2008 11:03 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:48 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:44 AM:
anonymous wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:38 AM:
The Civil Service Commision is doing the right thing. The City put a hiring freeze in knowing it was going to create this problem.
If a dog attacks someone, they should be shot, as should their owner.
The central tennet of the turf issue is we need to improve our EDUCATIONAL facilities, not our PLAYING fields.
"
forrest wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:02 AM:
forrest wrote on Apr 12, 2008 8:56 AM:
Nutrijwu wrote on Apr 12, 2008 8:32 AM:
You're after someone with a golf club, and they run away...that gives you the express right to run after them and beat the daylights out of them when they haven't committed a crime as of yet? It doesn't matter what their intentions were, they still do not have the right to be judge and jury! Last I knew...people were innocent until proven guilty (even if they were casing for unlocked cars)! Point of fact they didn't find one, and this nitwit went out and assaulted one. He's no hero, he's someone who was slighted and took the law into his own hands and got carried away.
Personally I think pit bulls should be destroyed on site. They were bred for one purpose, and that was fighting.
"
brew1234 wrote on Apr 12, 2008 1:45 AM: