"Must be all the firemen have to do is sit around playing on our computers, voting on The Citizen question today about how to use new trainees." The person who wrote that Two Cents comment the other day must be ignorant of what is involved in becoming and being a fireman.
I'm not saying that this Midnight Cowboy Schuster is doing a lousy job with BID, but I do notice that all the delivery trucks coming to Auburn's downtown area are installing bullet-proof glass and are advertising for tail-gunners.
I like firefighters, they are very important to the community, but with every administration and in every paper and article in The Citizen, do we have to hear everything about the fire department? We've got roads that are horrible, we've got downtown that's a ghost town, and all we hear in every administration is fire department, fire department.
Get rid of one firehouse, two is enough for Auburn. It will cut the budget and the number of firemen we'll need.
Why doesn't somebody tell John McCain we didn't have victory in Viet Nam and now they're running tours for the Americans.
The ADA makes it illegal to discriminate against people with disabilities, but the law is a joke. It's a feel-good law and it's not enforced because people with mental disabilities are openly discriminated against in hiring.
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.




The Citizens' Say
There are 32 comment(s)
nature lover wrote on Apr 2, 2008 12:25 PM:
stick wrote on Apr 2, 2008 10:44 AM:
stick wrote on Apr 2, 2008 10:43 AM:
vic wrote on Apr 2, 2008 10:22 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 2, 2008 9:46 AM:
BTW, I did finally get a chance to try out the new Swaby's. My son and I stopped in there for a bite to eat this past Saturday. It's very nice -- the food was good, reasonably priced (not cheap, but not expensive), the bartender was very friendly (she thanked me three times, LOL, for teaching her a new drink: my favorite "White Irishman" -- which is a White Russian with whiskey instead of vodka), and the setting was still full of quirky, oddball stuff, though some of the more way-out stuff has disappeared.
And now that they serve food, it's OK to bring an under-21 in with you.
Too bad I am just not a night person and missed the re-opening. "
cm wrote on Apr 2, 2008 8:52 AM:
the students apparently planned to knock the teacher unconscious with a crystal paperweight, bind her with the handcuffs and tape and then stab her with the knife.
Children are too young to be sentenced to a youth detention center."
A serious kiddie boot camp is much needed!! "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 2, 2008 8:44 AM:
But I would like to separate the issue of how a marine or other military person thinks of him- or herself and address instead just the point about how the media talks about people in the military, specifically when they are injured or killed.
The way the Media has been using the term "troop" is just plain misuse of the language; "troop," according to all the definitions listed in the OED always, refers to a GROUP of individuals, never a single individual. It's an inaccurate use as well as just plain bad grammar.
The Media has been not been using the term "troop" as a way to honor the feelings of brotherhood and One-ness felt by marines or other military personnel. If they were honoring your brotherhood, perhaps they'd say "a group of marines were killed today" to place emphasis on your being marines more than plain persons, but "troop" is about as generic as you can get.
(Do marines really have that same feeling of being "one" with sailors, national guardsmen, foot soldiers, etc? I've never had that impression, though I could be mistaken. Correct me if I am mistaken, but I've always thought marines are a tight group specifically as marines, and see themselves as an elite, with a higher code of ethics and, as you say, One-ness or brotherhood, of LOYALTY to fellow marines, not as generic service personnel).
No, I don't believe for a minute that the Media has picked up on that term out of respect or as a way of honoring military personnel and their One-ness. Rather, it is a way to blunt, desensitize and diminish the deaths of Americans fighting in the war down to a blank, depersonalized, flat, generic term.
Do you not have more emotional associations with the word "marine" than with the word "troop?" "Marine" surely says to you honor, pride, loyalty, specialized training, earning the right to call yourself by that name, comaraderie, team, one-ness, brotherhood and much more about which I don't know? But "troop" is just a flat, generic term with little emotion associated.
If you had to die in the service of your country, would you not rather die a marine than a "troop?" "
cm wrote on Apr 2, 2008 1:21 AM:
all of the candidates have their pockets full of "buy me" sticky notes!
The facts are Obama has "raised" the most monies, I am sure when they wash is done his totals from corporates will be higher than pubicly spoken right now.
Give it another month or two and really watch the mud-slinging.
Right now I am still voting for "none of the above" "
cm wrote on Apr 2, 2008 1:16 AM:
I am sure FG means well on the "troop" issue. In my job I have stores-corporate labels them all numbers-I on the other hand label them all names.
At times we seem to be talking about different places for I don't memorize their numbers and corporate doesn't memorize their names!
It reminds me of Judges and how everyone is case number and NOT a person.
YET being from a military family, I understand it's a totally different kind of family. Just as the guards, police, and firefighters have THEIR families, In these types of families we are ONE!
ANGMOM3--ALL of us in the same room--hahaha wouldn't that be a Citizen Front-Page News!! hahaha
ps. I don't care if you type in caps-if it makes it comfortable for you to read easier--CAP AWAY!!! "
pentangelli wrote on Apr 1, 2008 10:45 PM:
Chaos wrote on Apr 1, 2008 9:11 PM:
Semper Fi Mac... Great to make your aquaintance. IRT the previous posts and the problem of collectively isolating individuals as "troops", I consider it a compliment when someone lumps me into that band of brothers simply called Marines. Take me to my grave simply as a Marine and I will consider it an Honor. Just my personal thoughts, I am sure you and "all" Marines agree with them, but I do not expect some to appreciate such statements. Not a hit on them, just a reality of serving a lifetime in the Corps.
Stay safe devil dog...
Chaos "
ANGMOM3 wrote on Apr 1, 2008 7:13 PM:
oldtimer wrote on Apr 1, 2008 5:31 PM:
"Thanks".Thanks "CHAOS" didn't know
there was another Jar-Head out there!!!
"semper fidelis" "
ANGMOM3 wrote on Apr 1, 2008 3:26 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 1, 2008 2:31 PM:
[Begin quotation]
True enough, Obama does not take money from oil companies. No candidate does. It is illegal for corporations to give money to politicians. Corporations, however, do have political action committees that collect voluntary donations from employees and then donate them to candidates. Obama doesn't take money from PACs. He also doesn't take money from lobbyists.
But he does accept money from executives and other employees of oil companies and two of his fundraisers are oil company executives. As of Feb. 29, Obama's presidential campaign had received nearly $214,000 from oil and gas industry employees and their families, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. Clinton had received nearly $307,000 from industry workers and their families and Republican Sen. John McCain, the likely GOP presidential nominee, received nearly $394,000, according to the center's totals.
[End quotation]
So, the bottom line is ALL THREE viable candidates are taking money from Big Oil -- what kind of "choice" is that for the voter? Is it even possible in this country to get on the final ballot if you aren't bought and sold by Big Oil?!?
Obama seems to have taken less than his fellow candidates, and he is making a big production out of it, but that just makes him the lesser of three evils. Sigh. "
chippy wrote on Apr 1, 2008 1:22 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 1, 2008 11:29 AM:
If a whole group, unit, patrol, battalion, whatever the size group, were all killed, it would make sense to say "a troop was killed." But the media has very recently (past year or so) begun referring to individuals as "troops."
I've played professional sports, where the "team" has to be ONE and either win or lose, and individuals within the group watch each other's backs in a gridiron "battle," where you stand or fall depending on how you work as ONE. You might say a team won or lost a game (as one "troop" might win or lose a battle), but you wouldn't say one "team" was injured or traded or franchised. You say one "player."
It very conveniently depersonalizes the deaths of living, breathing human individuals to call them by the group term "troop," as if they had no meaning as persons. "
union wrote on Apr 1, 2008 9:49 AM:
I think these recruits need on the job training. Wake up union members and work with the city with this contact. Or the city should look else where for fire fighters. "
cm wrote on Apr 1, 2008 9:31 AM:
I think they say "troop" because in the military you are "whole."
Each unit is ONE.
The military have a totally different comradery than we do in our daily lives with friendships. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Apr 1, 2008 7:31 AM:
Geez, I wish the media would refer to people as people instead of depersonalized groups. "Married soldiers" or "married servicepeople" or "married servicemen and -women" or even "married military personnel."
It just really rubs me wrong when they announce that "3 troops were killed today in a suicide bombing." No, three PEOPLE were killed, three soldiors, three servicemen (and/or -women) -- not "troops." I've even heard them say "One troop was killed today." How ridiculous and insulting. That "troop" was an individual human being, not a faceless depersonalized "troop." "
chaos wrote on Mar 31, 2008 11:15 PM:
I will never minimize the fine efforts of our fire fighters and the dangers that they might face, but, as a retired Marine, I ask you; is a young Marine recruit, thrown into combat, worthy of the task of defending his fellow Marine without having faced a bullet or a mortar or a artillery shell. Of course he is; and he will be better for it.
The excuse that a "recruit" is not worthy is pathetic, it makes me gag to read the arguments of this post; anyone in defense is ignorant, no excuse. The issue here is not capabilities of the individual firefighter but more so Union demands. Time to get a grip and do the job you have selected, young or old. Quit the whining already and get rid of your Union representatives, or at least change leadership and priorities. It is intuitively obvious that it is not the mission that is valued here but the benifits and compensation of the employment. Pretty much a NYS standard, not sure I blame you, but, I moved the heck out of state because of it.
Chaos "
cm wrote on Mar 31, 2008 7:29 PM:
One person can just sit and vote a hundred times.
Maybe the paper should change that-like AOL has polls and you can only vote ONCE! "
cm wrote on Mar 31, 2008 7:11 PM:
Almost every job today is On-the-job training, that includes electricians, plumbers, auto mechanics, and even surgeons.
Have you not been to University Hospital and 10 people walk in WITH the doctor?
I am sure the newbies didn't just walk into the fire station and say "Hi I am a fireman", with no classes what so ever!
Plus if there was a huge fire, with more than 13 needed, the surrounding areas would come aid.
"
cm wrote on Mar 31, 2008 7:00 PM:
7000 protestors in Ukraine holding signs "Yankee go home" because they prefer communism over NATO,
YET the USA is the largest single donor to THEIR nuclear plant in Chernobyl.
I vote for "go home" and take our dollars with us!!! "
karl L wrote on Mar 31, 2008 5:18 PM:
stevedallas wrote on Mar 31, 2008 4:55 PM:
stevedallas wrote on Mar 31, 2008 4:49 PM:
forrest wrote on Mar 31, 2008 3:36 PM:
dd wrote on Mar 31, 2008 3:30 PM:
karl L wrote on Mar 31, 2008 3:06 PM:
nature lover wrote on Mar 31, 2008 2:55 PM:
chippy wrote on Mar 31, 2008 1:44 PM: