The town of Sennett remains at loggerheads with Ryback & Rig Properties, new owners of the landmark Pioneer Restaurant building on Route 5.
The ongoing dispute stems from the wording and subsequent interpretation of town zoning ordinances. The town's zoning board of appeals is expected to make a decision this week.
But in an area begging for economic stimulus, why the red tape?
From what I gather the new owners boldly overstepped their boundaries, sauntering into the forbidden realm of outdoor seating.
I've also heard rumors of a drive-up window - the audacity!
Seriously, what is this about?
Why is there always a pocket of resistance when it comes to change, even positive change?
I admit, I don't have insider information on the ordeal but from what's been presented in the press, the points of deliberation seem moot.
Here we have investors looking to create legitimate business that benefits the community, at the same time resurrecting a beloved landmark, and people still aren't happy.
As if expanding one parking lot is going to flood out Central and parts of Western New York. It's absurd.
Rivaling the wide variety of eateries in nearby Auburn and Skaneateles, it doesn't make sense to squabble over an establishment that can only improve Sennett's coffers.
I swear, Ryback & Rig Properties would have an easier time erecting a Hooters in Auburn than a family restaurant in Sennett.
Concern about outdoor noise is valid, but would an outdoor dining section be any more disruptive than an ice-cream stand?
Keep in mind, it snows six months out of the year, and besides, outdoor seating can't compete with air-conditioning.
Not to mention that when it comes to nearby residents, nearby is a relative term.
I live directly across from a baseball field and I've never found it particularly disruptive.
I hate to perpetuate gossip, but this hullabaloo is so ridiculous it almost has to be a personal vendetta.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
But in an area begging for economic stimulus, why the red tape?
From what I gather the new owners boldly overstepped their boundaries, sauntering into the forbidden realm of outdoor seating.
I've also heard rumors of a drive-up window - the audacity!
Seriously, what is this about?
Why is there always a pocket of resistance when it comes to change, even positive change?
I admit, I don't have insider information on the ordeal but from what's been presented in the press, the points of deliberation seem moot.
Here we have investors looking to create legitimate business that benefits the community, at the same time resurrecting a beloved landmark, and people still aren't happy.
As if expanding one parking lot is going to flood out Central and parts of Western New York. It's absurd.
Rivaling the wide variety of eateries in nearby Auburn and Skaneateles, it doesn't make sense to squabble over an establishment that can only improve Sennett's coffers.
I swear, Ryback & Rig Properties would have an easier time erecting a Hooters in Auburn than a family restaurant in Sennett.
Concern about outdoor noise is valid, but would an outdoor dining section be any more disruptive than an ice-cream stand?
Keep in mind, it snows six months out of the year, and besides, outdoor seating can't compete with air-conditioning.
Not to mention that when it comes to nearby residents, nearby is a relative term.
I live directly across from a baseball field and I've never found it particularly disruptive.
I hate to perpetuate gossip, but this hullabaloo is so ridiculous it almost has to be a personal vendetta.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
The Citizens' Say
There are 10 comment(s)
logic wrote on Mar 29, 2008 11:18 AM:
If you have an opinion, I would atleast think it would be an informed one! "
melinda@neal.us wrote on Mar 29, 2008 9:39 AM:
fburger wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:57 AM:
Outdoor seating requests are one thing, but a drive-thru request smacks of fast food, or worse PHARMACY. Seriously, don't be naive! When was the last time a mom and pop opened a drive thru window? 1952????
Are there not enough microwaved appetizers in this town!?
Zoning board is right to quibble. If I had one of those nice hoops park and near-hoops properties, I wouldn't want a Sonic franchise next door either.
"
jimbrewster wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:49 AM:
ethan wrote on Mar 28, 2008 12:57 AM:
(anyone 'new' meaning if your great grandparents were born here, and down the family line you may get a yes)
Here is a place that will end up paying taxes,fixed up a beaten down structure and you all are making them jump hoops. Bringing in a NON FAST food eatery is one of the best ways for families to get together, a place to hold meetings or maybe even a party or banquet. Lighten up guys . Be part of the stimulis package . "
brew1234 wrote on Mar 28, 2008 12:14 AM:
yetanotherpinhead wrote on Mar 25, 2008 12:32 PM:
This better all be settled at the upcoming meeting, and the place allowed to open up ASAP. End the absurdity. "
logic wrote on Mar 25, 2008 12:24 PM:
She hasn't a clue as to what it is really about. "
hilltop wrote on Mar 25, 2008 4:15 AM:
tlb4 wrote on Mar 24, 2008 1:32 PM: