The town of Sennett remains at loggerheads with Ryback & Rig Properties, new owners of the landmark Pioneer Restaurant building on Route 5.
The ongoing dispute stems from the wording and subsequent interpretation of town zoning ordinances. The town's zoning board of appeals is expected to make a decision this week.
But in an area begging for economic stimulus, why the red tape?
From what I gather the new owners boldly overstepped their boundaries, sauntering into the forbidden realm of outdoor seating.
I've also heard rumors of a drive-up window - the audacity!
Seriously, what is this about?
Why is there always a pocket of resistance when it comes to change, even positive change?
I admit, I don't have insider information on the ordeal but from what's been presented in the press, the points of deliberation seem moot.
Here we have investors looking to create legitimate business that benefits the community, at the same time resurrecting a beloved landmark, and people still aren't happy.
As if expanding one parking lot is going to flood out Central and parts of Western New York. It's absurd.
Rivaling the wide variety of eateries in nearby Auburn and Skaneateles, it doesn't make sense to squabble over an establishment that can only improve Sennett's coffers.
I swear, Ryback & Rig Properties would have an easier time erecting a Hooters in Auburn than a family restaurant in Sennett.
Concern about outdoor noise is valid, but would an outdoor dining section be any more disruptive than an ice-cream stand?
Keep in mind, it snows six months out of the year, and besides, outdoor seating can't compete with air-conditioning.
Not to mention that when it comes to nearby residents, nearby is a relative term.
I live directly across from a baseball field and I've never found it particularly disruptive.
I hate to perpetuate gossip, but this hullabaloo is so ridiculous it almost has to be a personal vendetta.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com
But in an area begging for economic stimulus, why the red tape?
From what I gather the new owners boldly overstepped their boundaries, sauntering into the forbidden realm of outdoor seating.
I've also heard rumors of a drive-up window - the audacity!
Seriously, what is this about?
Why is there always a pocket of resistance when it comes to change, even positive change?
I admit, I don't have insider information on the ordeal but from what's been presented in the press, the points of deliberation seem moot.
Here we have investors looking to create legitimate business that benefits the community, at the same time resurrecting a beloved landmark, and people still aren't happy.
As if expanding one parking lot is going to flood out Central and parts of Western New York. It's absurd.
Rivaling the wide variety of eateries in nearby Auburn and Skaneateles, it doesn't make sense to squabble over an establishment that can only improve Sennett's coffers.
I swear, Ryback & Rig Properties would have an easier time erecting a Hooters in Auburn than a family restaurant in Sennett.
Concern about outdoor noise is valid, but would an outdoor dining section be any more disruptive than an ice-cream stand?
Keep in mind, it snows six months out of the year, and besides, outdoor seating can't compete with air-conditioning.
Not to mention that when it comes to nearby residents, nearby is a relative term.
I live directly across from a baseball field and I've never found it particularly disruptive.
I hate to perpetuate gossip, but this hullabaloo is so ridiculous it almost has to be a personal vendetta.
Estabrook's column appears Mondays and she can be reached at estabrookcarole@yahoo.com