Mark Kukiela is an employee of The Citizen and a Cayuga County resident that would like to see government spending brought in line with what is affordable. Read his ideas if you care about how your hard earned tax dollars are being spent, and feel free to engage in some friendly debate. Mark believes caring does not end with complaining; we need to encourage action from our lawmakers where change is necessary.
Look for fresh postings from Mark at the top of The Citizens' Say postings below:



The Citizens' Say
There are 42 comment(s)
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:01 AM:
Andy B
My apologies...I checked with our newsroom and they are experiencing some technical difficulties.
The video should be up by the end of the day Friday. "
Andy B wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:37 AM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 27, 2008 4:13 PM:
Not since Emmitt Smith left Dallas to finish his career as an Arizona Cardinal have I been this shell-shocked!
There were many remarks made concerning the state of the city and county, a bit of back-patting and many challenges reviewed that our area faces. While the city manager’s remarks were mostly upbeat, the county assessment seemed more like a “Pity Me” session. I didn’t know if County Manager Wayne Allen had just fallen off the “Woe is Me” Express or if he was providing bullet points as to why he should surrender the fort. I certainly did not get the sense that the state of the county was strong, but in fact, very ominous! I am still trying to figure out whether or not the county has any responsibility for the community’s future whatsoever, or if it is so shackled by state mandates that it might as well fold up its tent and go home.
The part that brought me to my Emmitt Smith analogy arose during the Q&A session when a question was posed regarding consolidation of services.
The answer that was given by the county manager explained that the consolidation type changes need to come from the public. He stated that it would take grassroots effort to get some of these changes made.
My question: Where is the leadership from our elected officials?
Barely able to contain myself any longer I stood up and asked that very question. We as voters and taxpayers put these people in office to investigate what is best for our towns, villages and county.
For heaven’s sake propose a plan, suggest a solution and look to the public for input. For our elected officials to turn this back around and almost blame “the people” for the lack of change is not only ludicrous but it is insulting!
If you are not willing to do anything to improve our community, resign and we will try to get someone in office that will.
Please watch the video of the state of the city/county luncheon on this website and see for yourself. It should be posted around 5p.m. Please share your opinions of what our leaders believe is the state of our community.
"
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 26, 2008 2:33 PM:
telldastory,
I am in the process of looking into the issues you raised regarding Owasco's water.
As for the trash pickup, I personally prefer curb pickup as a matter of convenience. Surely everyone has their personal preference. I currently pay nearly $400 per year for a contract hauler to pick up trash. If the town contracted for this service based on the rates cited from other towns, it could cut my fees significantly. That would be a win for me.
As for the recycling center running in the red, I see it as a potential "glass half full" situation.
I am dismayed it was allowed to operate with questionable measures of accountability however I laud the current efforts to uncover it and hopefully make it right. I offer kudos to Town Councilor Ed Wagner for digging into it and bringing his findings to light.
Provided something is done to quickly rectify the situation I am hard pressed to complain about it at this point.
"
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 26, 2008 2:03 PM:
School district consolidation will help relieve some of the expense burden on the 7 districts in Cayuga County. This is yet another reason that district consolidation makes sense for the county. "
telldastory wrote on Mar 21, 2008 11:10 AM:
Let's begin with water. Rates have not been increased since 1992, rather they have been upping the ad valorem tax to make up the difference. The Town is selling water under contract to Fleming for less then it sells to it's own residents, who by the way are paying the capitol improvements so we could sell to Fleming. A violation of Town Code: § 144-30. Users outside Water District.
The Town Board may enter into a contract or contracts for the sale of water to users not within the Owasco Water District Rates for such use shall be specified in each contract, provided that such rates shall not be less than the rates established for users within the District. In fixing such rates, the Board may consider whether any such applicant is by the Owasco Water District as a property owner within said District. Any contract for such service outside the District shall require the party requesting such service to comply with the provisions of this chapter.
They then did not bill several hundred for those ad valorem taxes for 20+ years. Recently many have been added but they still under-budgeted by at least $200K. Water rates are supposed to be increasing this July to over $17.50 for minimum use. Not very fiscally responsible to not raise water fees as costs increase is it?
I'm sure you have read about the deficit at the recycling center. What is your take on that? I don't really care if I have curb-side pickup or drive my trash there, but I do care that we are paying people to do jobs that are not getting done. That there is NO accountability or documentation of cash transactions. The place is nearly 50K in the red, and that is after the 50 cent bag increase! Our tax dollars could be put to better use or paid to people who would actually appreciate and do the work. "
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 19, 2008 10:01 AM:
Good Day telldastory!
Thank you for your post. Can you offer some specifics(water, assessments, town resources)?
If you would rather send a direct email you can reach me at: mark.kukiela@lee.net "
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 18, 2008 4:51 PM:
NYS Commission of Property Tax Relief Update
I received a letter from John C. Reid, the Executive Director of the commission.
The letter acknowledges correspondence shared by Senator David Valesky regarding the suggestion of school district consolidation. Thank you Senator Valesky!
Summarizing a few items of note:
The commission has a website: www.cptr.state.ny.us Check it often to stay informed about the commission’s work and upcoming meetings in nearby cities.
The scheduled meetings to date:
Thursday, March 20, 2008 Location: Rochester
Wednesday, April 2, 2008 Location: Buffalo
Thursday, April 10, 2008 Location: Syracuse
Wednesday, April 23, 2008 Location: Albany
The Syracuse meeting location is yet to be determined.
There website includes a link to a 6 hour webcast of testimony the commission heard at its first meeting on March 5th.
There are online forms where you can submit ideas for property tax relief.
You can sign up to join the commission’s e-mail list to receive updates on the commission’s progress.
The letter was dated 3/7/08 which was prior to the governor’s resignation. When I contacted the commission’s offices I was told the meetings are still going to be held as scheduled. All press inquiries are being handled by the governor’s office and I have not been able to reach anyone at the number provided.
My hope is this bipartisan commission will still be allowed to gather data and present its findings to the governor. These efforts are critical to our future; please support this commission’s work.
"
tHeReApEr wrote on Mar 18, 2008 9:30 AM:
stevedallas wrote on Mar 17, 2008 6:15 PM:
cm wrote on Mar 17, 2008 4:47 PM:
why dont you do a week long rida-a-long-with FD dept, then give your pro & cons to what you think could be changed. The others can chime in as to what they feel is necessary to the community?
"
Andy B wrote on Mar 17, 2008 4:40 PM:
telldastory wrote on Mar 17, 2008 12:53 PM:
You should take a good look at how the town you live in is fleecing its taxpayers. It will make you ill! "
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 17, 2008 11:43 AM:
Thank you for your input. You seem to have experience in these matters. If I were a betting man, I would guess you are or have been a firefighter. If that is the case, thank you for your service to the community.
In my original post I asked: Is it necessary for firefighters to respond to every slip and fall call in the city? Or could the ambulance service with trained paramedics responding suffice? As I understand it, when the fire department responds for this type of call, they bring an engine and a rescue truck with basic EMTs. The ambulance arrives with its own EMTs that offer advanced life support capabilities.
What's your sense? Could this redundancy be reduced without compromising public safety? "
Hillbilly wrote on Mar 16, 2008 4:59 PM:
stevedallas wrote on Mar 16, 2008 12:31 PM:
Hillbilly wrote on Mar 16, 2008 8:22 AM:
Well, I am not applying this to the public Grade School system. I am saying if we don't stop this now we will be paying the Colleges like we pay the Grade School system today. But, with the colleges we won't get a vote on their budget, we will just get the bill. Plus grade school is mandated by law, college is not. Yes kids 16 and older can quit High School (which should be changed to must complete to obtain a drivers license-incentive to stay in school, this is a whole different subject).
Did you know that in this years budget from Spitzer he proposed a pilot program for the City of Syracuse. The program was for city children who qualified at a Jr. High regents level to be offered free tuition to SUNY or CUNY schools for the first two years? This means the state tax payers would be paying for these children to go to college. Again where in the Constitution is the College education of any child guaranteed to be paid for by the tax payer?
But, if this is not important then when your paying more for the "college tax" than you do for your "local school tax" don't complain. By the time it gets this bad I will be dead and this will be on the backs of the Young Pro's of today and even the kids of today who benefit from it.
As for the Fire Department problem Auburn has. If you can't afford the Department, disband it. Go to a volunteer system. The Fire Department might look at it differently then. I once suggested a combination of paid and volunteers but, no one listened. And as one writer says, they get anywhere from 30 to 50 fire fighters responding to emergencies. "
shadow wrote on Mar 15, 2008 7:30 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 5:58 PM:
Yikes wrote on Mar 15, 2008 4:37 PM:
Regarding your point about the "magic" 15 number being for firefighter safety, it's baseless. If you lived in the town of Fleming and it wasn't staffed with a minimum of 15 firefighters 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and you had a fire at your house, would you stand out front and disallow them to help because only 11 showed up within the first 5 minutes? I certainly wouldn't and for two reasons.
1 - I can't count higher than 10 without taking off my shoes and socks and counting on my toes.
2 - They are trained much better than you and me to assess the situation and determine the potential risk at the scene.
"
stevedallas wrote on Mar 15, 2008 3:22 PM:
magpie wrote on Mar 15, 2008 2:08 PM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 14, 2008 2:06 PM:
Some fire officials have said the 15-person shift is necessary to maintain safety.
I would imagine that could be the case when firefighters are required to respond to every 911 call that comes in, even when ambulance service alone would be sufficient.
If this requirement were changed, the 15-person shift could be reduced without impacting safety. "
Andy B wrote on Mar 14, 2008 1:08 PM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 12, 2008 5:04 PM:
The question on the College Chargeback is an interesting one. However if we were to apply that logic to school taxes, people who don't have children in school should not pay school taxes.
Can you imagine how high taxes would be for families with school children if they were the only ones paying for schools?
Interesting concept...but that may be stretching things a bit for now.
I will continue to push for consolidation first before I make that leap.
That said, please keep the thoughts coming. I appreciate the input. "
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 12, 2008 4:49 PM:
Simply stated; overtime spending needs to be brought under control.
The citizens of Auburn voted and put the former fire chief in office, knowing this issue loomed on the horizon. I have the utmost respect for Mayor “Chief” Quill, and appreciate his many years of service to this community.
If I were an Auburn taxpayer however, I would be concerned about having him at the helm during these negotiations. I believe it would be difficult for anyone to separate their allegiances in a similar circumstance.
Firefighters put their lives in each others hands. There may be no stronger bond than the one that exists among these brave souls.
Is it reasonable to believe that one year out of the uniform could diminish this type of devotion to his brethren?
However, let’s assume that is not an issue.
Let’s assume the union agrees to a fresh set of contract talks, following the city missing the contract negotiation deadline.
Let’s assume the city is willing to look for efficiencies within the current system.
I suggest investigating ways of controlling cost without compromising the protection of the community.
I would ask the city to look at the charter as it relates to firefighter responsibilities. Is it necessary for firefighters to respond to every slip and fall call in the city? Or could the ambulance service with trained paramedics responding suffice? As I understand it, when the fire department responds for this type of call, they bring an engine and a rescue truck with basic EMTs. The ambulance arrives with its own EMTs that offer advanced life support capabilities. Is this redundancy necessary? A reduction in responding to these types of calls may reduce the man-hours necessary per shift. At the very least, something could be done to reduce this redundancy.
Another suggestion with a force requirement of 15 firefighters per shift; explore the use of an “On-Call” system to reduce expenses. The department could maintain the required firefighters per shift with a specified number of the crew “on call”. This on call time would still be paid for but at a lesser rate. With the requirement that firefighters live within the city limits, they would never be too far from the station.
A strong fire department is perhaps the greatest insurance policy any city can have. Compromising that could be a detriment, yet I would encourage city officials to look at ways of doing things more cost effectively without putting lives in danger. This may afford greater opportunities to negotiate a suitable contract that is fair to the firefighters and the city.
What do you think?
"
Hillbilly wrote on Mar 11, 2008 9:01 AM:
Andy B wrote on Mar 11, 2008 8:25 AM:
I think you should dig into this Fireman issue for us. Get the numbers and the reasoning behind them for both sides. That way a proper discussion on the issue can take place. "
Hillbilly wrote on Mar 7, 2008 1:18 PM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 6, 2008 10:13 AM:
Thank you for your input. The system you mentioned is interesting. Would you kindly share what state and community you are from?
If you please, you can email that information to me directly in lieu of sharing it here:
mark.kukiela@lee.net
I do not believe we need a 20-member school board. One suggestion might include having one representative from each of the current school districts to comprise the new Cayuga County School District Board of Education. This new board would be a smaller than the one that currently exists in the Auburn Enlarged School District alone. Therefore we would save additional money simply by reducing the total number of school boards and members that currently exist throughout Cayuga County.
"
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 6, 2008 9:55 AM:
Thank you for the clarification. Your capital improvement suggestions make good sense in my mind. Furthermore, with the artificial turf battles that continue to rage in our area these districts could learn lessons from what other school districts have done for stadium refurbishments. Consider Washington County, Maryland for example that built a brand new multi-use stadium. What got the ball rolling was community effort, fundraisers and contributions. It didn't start by immediately asking the taxpayer to foot the bill.
Midway down the page on this link you will see the update on the project from 2005: http://www.wcboe.k12.md.us/board_updates/011805.cfm
I know I am going to sound like a broken record and someone along the way will say "Why don't you go back to Maryland?"
But I live here and I am tired of paying for an overbloated system.
The following link contains a recent update regarding the North High stadium project:
http://www.herald-mail.com/?module=displaystory&story_id=148461&format=print "
cm wrote on Mar 5, 2008 9:48 PM:
The plus side is you save monies on lesser superintendants pay.
The minus is they have a board person per school -so you lose monies for paying salaries to over 20+ people.
They never seem to have enough money and are always making cuts in the budget.
I still have to buy and send in paper towels/tissues/disinfectant/and even toilet paper.
My opinion? I don't see a reduction of taxes using either system.
"
Andy B wrote on Mar 5, 2008 11:20 AM:
Andy B wrote on Mar 5, 2008 11:15 AM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 4, 2008 2:46 PM:
I am not sure what your question refers to. Please provide further explanation of your question:
How are you going to conbtent for blogs if you don't pay for it? "
Andy B wrote on Mar 4, 2008 1:01 PM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 3, 2008 9:55 AM:
Governor Spitzer announced the New York State Commission on Property Tax Relief in January that is looking at this very issue.
The chair of the committee is the Nassau County Executive Thomas R. Suozzi, and the committee is slated to provide a preliminary report by May 15 on school property tax caps. The final report is due December 1, 2008. Don’t let this commission complete its work without hearing from you.
Send a message online at: http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/CountyExecutive/email.html
Or write to:
County Executive
Thomas R. Suozzi
1 West Street
Mineola, NY 11501
(516) 571-3131
Please be clear, I am not anti-education. I am concerned about our future and believe it has become far too expensive to live here.
I invite and encourage readers to offer information, research and opinions on these topics and their experiences with other education systems. In national rankings according to the www.nces.ed.gov website, Maryland’s education surpasses New York in many categories. For example the following are rankings for 8th grade public schools:
New York Maryland
Writing 21st 10th
Mathematics 34th 16th
Reading 27th 21st
Science N/A 32nd
I know there are complexities that exist that I am not privy to, and that no system is perfect. However, when there is a model available that saves considerable amounts of money and proves to measure up with solid educational results for the money spent, I believe it should be examined.
Finally, the day my blog is censored is the same day it will end.
"
james_13021 wrote on Mar 3, 2008 5:32 AM:
I agree with his statement as I see spending a little high. But there is more to consider than numbers. People, children, and the quality of the education.
It seems hard to believe that the county in Maryland has SUCH a better education than here.
"Little Boy Blue" needs to do more research and present more facts before crying "Wolf".
"
picketpin wrote on Mar 2, 2008 4:32 PM:
jeffyg wrote on Mar 2, 2008 3:45 PM:
jfj1945 wrote on Mar 2, 2008 2:56 PM:
The taxpayer watchblog wrote on Mar 2, 2008 1:05 PM:
In Maryland, school districts are comprised of an entire county of schools. One county has one school district with one superintendent, business manager, staff etc. Here in Cayuga County, if my figures are accurate there are 7 school districts; with 7 superintendents, 7 business managers, staffs etc. These positions and support staff alone account for millions of taxpayer dollars each year. Is this spending necessary?
I have analyzed 05-06 figures from the New York State Education Department's website, which provides figures for each school district in the state. I also used figures from the Washington County Maryland School District for the same school year.
In Washington County, there were 20,000 students, 44 schools and their budget was $157.7Million.
In Cayuga County, we had 11,000 students, 24 schools and budgets totaled $126.9Million.
In comparison, we have 58% the number of students as in Washington County and 55% of the schools; yet we are spending 81% of what they are spending and have 7 times the number of school districts they have.
Taxes in our state are far too high to sustain livelihood and I believe our school spending is a large contributor. I believe we should consider consolidating the 7 Cayuga County school districts into 1 district as an initial means of saving taxpayer money.
What do you think?
"