The school district is going to get the field donated by local people, donating $150,000, but they don't tell you that every 10 years that field has to be replaced, and there'll be no state aid on that and it's going to cost Auburn taxpayers millions every 10 years, and that's going to be a back-breaker.
Look what the liberals have done to that recruiting station in New York City, to that Jewish school in Israel, to all those homes in Washington burned down by leftist liberal extremists groups. When will the liberal media start exposing what's going on in this country, instead of covering up for these people of hate?
This is for Murray Lynch: Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.
I hear the Bush-McCain war is now drafting psychiatrists for the troops going back three times.
I believe it's entirely inapproprate to use the term "adult" for degrading or filthy TV programs.
We're backing Cherry Love Duncan to fill the remainder of Steve Netti's term and run for his office next time it's open. She's a wonderful lady.
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 64 comment(s)
cm wrote on Mar 10, 2008 8:48 AM:
Its called being human--to always question WHY?
WHY-is a constant word we have and use daily since we learned to ask it at age 2.
In the prior hours of my dads death-he was babbling on and on about things in the bible, almost page for page-This man only went to church when someone died, a wedding, or a baptism. Yet he was speaking of being stoned for things he had done, it was as if he was "being judged" by himself or someone else?
There were moments he would laugh and moments he would cry. He said my mom and his family members, were right there (long passed).
I have a hospice neighbor-she states the same things she has witnessed thru the years in the days/hours before death, In religious and non-religious people.
WHY?
We say someone just peacefully went to sleep and never woke up, so we assume.
Did they really? Or was no one there to witness?
People speak of bright lights, seeing Jesus (Buddha,etc), seeing angels, WHY is one so quick to say they didn't?
People believe in past lives, having psychic abilities, have written their "charts" prior to birth, etc.,WHY do some think they don't?
WHY---lives on everyday!
I personally do not believe we just end our existence-for I have experienced way too many incidents that lead me think otherwise.
Why does it seem that "the good die young and the bad live forever"
I honestly don't know--maybe when I die I will have many more answers-
I have the "faith" I will have more answers!
"
stevedallas wrote on Mar 10, 2008 7:57 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Mar 10, 2008 7:33 AM:
If there's one important thing I have learned about grieving, it is that it is different for every person. What would slide off one person's back cuts another deeply. There is no magic formula for grieving, no set pattern we can call normal and expect to go through all the steps in the same order, no timetable by which one "should" be "over it." The very best thing a friend can do when someone about whom you care is grieving is to be kind and supportive and make sure they do not feel bad about their own feelings. Whatever they are feeling, it's what's right for that person. Don't let them feel bad if they are "stuck" in any particular "stage" -- maybe that person needs more time to process that part. Don't be thinking they "should" be over it in x number of months.
Who are we to judge? If we care about someone, we'll support the person through his/her hard times.
Gator -- right you are. Even those of us against the war can appreciate bravery and doing the right thing in a very wrong situation. The young lady is a very fine example and deserves the honors. "
Dan W wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:59 PM:
news reader wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:21 PM:
We should not second guess God, it is a form of idolatry, worshipping ourselves as our own god. It is covered in the 1st commandment. Some folks see commandments as oppressive rather than liberating. "
Gator wrote on Mar 9, 2008 7:54 PM:
"
karl L wrote on Mar 9, 2008 6:08 PM:
I will suppose that you are correct in your summation of the situation here, in reference to Mr Fearon and his words being "news"--however dubious I think the value. I suppose I should concede that fact.
I have to be honest however, when I say that I think that the eulogy was inappropriate for public forum--if it comforted the family, it would have done that in Church, and in private. Heck, they could have printed it up and sent it out to the guests on the Funeral Home guest list. But to put it in the paper--for MY money--is just a promotion of the myths of Religion.
Look, if you REALLY read it, it was really HARDLY about Mr Netti AT ALL--it was MORE about Mr Fearon's OWN perceptions of the "value" of what made Mr Netti a good man--that he allegedly exhibited all these rather enigmatic and unclearly-elucidated aspects of being a good human being WHICH HE PRESUMES WERE BECAUSE OF "GOD" AND RELIGION! I mean, I would have liked to hear WHY and WHAT Mr Netti did, said, or left in legacy stated in plain terms instead of making him out to be "good" simply because he was religious. That just reinforces the popular and religiously-propagated myth that in order to be a good upstanding man one needs to believe in God and especially, Christianity.
My opinion is further informed by a dear and close person to me who recently lost a very close family member--of which I shall not say much more--but suffice to say this person was very religious at the beginning of the dying process and I watched as their religious hope and pretensions faded painfully away, and the turmoil it caused within them as well. When we sat through the funeral mass, I could just see the anger welling up in them at all the empty platitudes being offered by the priest, and at all the assurances and mindless recitations of "God's mercy"! What a crock! I thought, "You know, why do we as a society just keep repeating these patently silly and deceptive falsehoods?" Do they REALLY help people deal? If God were so merciful and All-powerful, wouldn't you think he would "reserve" the "best deaths" (in sleep) for the most religious and exemplary Christians? Do you see the point? Uncomfortable questions to be sure, but should we really just keep promoting this silliness?
I am convinced even more so than after my OWN experiences that the whole "treatment" given by Religion concerning Death is emotionally unhealthy and damaging, and actually cause more conflict and prolonged suffering, rather than just learning to accept a natural, final "end" to a life. "
news reader wrote on Mar 9, 2008 5:11 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Mar 9, 2008 4:31 PM:
*****
Karl, cm, Gator, et al: I had another thought on the subject:
Imagine what you would think of a Christian group who went to Afghanistan to help (Muslim) victims of an earthquake, or a Jewish group who went to (say, Buddhist) Asia after a Tsunami -- if they were using those disasters as "opportunities" to proselytize the poor people in such a time that would be reprehensible. They should go into such a situation with a view to doing kindness and helping people who are trying to recover from a catastrophe -- it is no time to be trying to convert them -- it would be callous and lacking not only in respect, but in compassion.
They should be trying to be examples of the good in their respective religions, not salespeople, not at a time like that.
That situation is analogous to this current one, only a personal level.
I am sure this sort of thing has happened at times in history, but do you really want to be that kind of person? I just find that hard to believe.
Karl, you give us some insight into how you personally came to hold the views you do, and it helps us understand where you are coming from. It's brave to share such personal things, and I'll treat your revelations with respect, though I am sure you know you risk attacks when you share personal things here.
I don't think there is anything "wrong" with the way you responded to your personal circumstances. I might well have had similar feelings myself (except I was raised without any faith to lose). But here's where you could step outside all that and consider that another person, some other different person, in the very same circumstances as yours could react differently, and for very different reasons find their faith strengthened. Neither person is right or wrong, they are just different people with different ways. The trick is for each of these people to learn to respect the other's ways without expecting the other to feel and behave as they have.
Now, let's see if I can bring it back around to the less personal part of the discussion -- whether or not George Fearon's eulogy for Steve Netti belonged in the paper.
The newspaper is not "The State," so they have no obligation to stick to that separation thing.
They may or may not make claims of objectivity, but the reality is that every newspaper has some biases, and through their editorial pages, they even take positions, and sometimes even endorse political candidates. An honest paper will try to be upfront about their biases.
Knowing that Mr. Netti was well-regarded and even loved in the community, the paper chose to print a eulogy given by his friend, with the permission of the family. Insofar as they were reprinting what Mr. Fearon said, it's reporting the news. There were surely people who cared about Mr. Netti who lived far away and could not attend the service, or they may be people who have opinions about Mr. Fearon who would want to know what HE said. (Mr. Fearon is a local politician and public figure, after all, and has been judged more than once by readers right here in this forum before). I cannot see where printing a portion of the eulogy in the paper was anything out of line.
Those words may have riled you up, but I'd be willing to bet (and I don't gamble) that those words WERE a comfort to many among his family and friends -- why would you want to take that comfort away from them at this time? Even if you think them misguided, leave them to grieve as they will, take comfort where they may, and understand life in their own way -- that is the very most fundamental core of freedom for every person. "
Gator wrote on Mar 9, 2008 4:18 PM:
Farmer Gal - I sure hope you have someone there to pull you off the ceiling. I'm sure my atrocious spelling had you cringing!! "
Gator wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:59 PM:
karl L wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:56 PM:
Gator wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:47 PM:
karl L wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:04 PM:
I also don't care to "preach"--but if somebody doesn't say this stuff, no one will. If anyone's "preaching", it's the writer of the eulogy which started this whole thing!
And also, though I don't agree 100% with Murray, HIS heart is in the right place as well. He is passionate about what he believes, and even though it's quite the opposite of what I believe, I applaud his "fire" and conviction. "
Gator wrote on Mar 9, 2008 1:21 PM:
cm wrote on Mar 9, 2008 12:34 PM:
I have not ever been a parent of replacing the goldfish with another that "looks" like the dead one behind a childs back. Death is inevitable.
It is far better for the child to have their cry, their funeral, and buriel.
I have always encouraged friends to let their children go to "wakes" while explaining the process and let them say their final goodbyes.
My daughter remembers at age 4 she placed pennies in papa's hand to take with him-for he always gave her pennies when he saw her-RICHES in her eyes!
I am not overly religious BUT God, prayer, and mostly faith is within me.
Along with morals and values, that were taught to me by everyone I came into contact with throughout my life!
I will stand by my statement-you crossed the line and were totally disrepectful. "
karl L wrote on Mar 9, 2008 12:03 PM:
cm's charge of "a predator's mind" is just so emotionally wrought with illusory projection that it literally made me chuckle. As if I really started out with a hidden agenda to promote Atheism to these grieving kids. Puhleeeeze! If you believe that, cm, there ain't NUTHIN I'm gonna say to convince you other wise, so hate away, honey.
I remember as a young child feeling EXACTLY the same feelings of doubt about my own grandfather's very protracted and painful death from illness, and for years afterward wondered why "God" didn't save him, as he was a profoundly pious man who was a hero to me--stoic, quiet, very outwardly religious, and a model of humility. Now, when he died, I found a tiny "stash" of two Playboy books under the newspaper lining of the cardboard box that he kept near his favorite chair as a garbage bin, and I remember thinking with absolute certainty for YEARS "Well, I see it now: THAT'S WHY God killed him so slowly and horribly!"
I remained Catholic--even ardently so--for some 20 years afterward, and eventually reconciled that silly childhood misunderstanding, but for years it tormented me with confusing, contradictory thoughts about a "merciful, saving" God, and I long pondered on how "He" could be so cruel.
The bottom line--if someone had just explained to me that "God" had nothing to do with grandpa's Playboys or death, and that death and disease is natural on one hand, and preventable to an extent by healthier living, I wouldn't have wasted do many sleepless nights "fearing God" and praying for nothing, for forgiveness for Grandpa, whom I believe now is simply "the dust from which he came".
If it sounds like I was "angry with God" don't be so hasty to believe that; I was more angry at the people who led me to believe such silly nonsense in the first place, and when I talk about what the children of Mr Netti might be experiencing now in their tortured grief, it's because I'm speaking from personal experience.
I find it profoundly ridiculous and outright pathetically contemptible that ANYONE could think, much less say, that God "saves" ANYONE by finally "taking them home" i.e., letting them finally die. I mean, really--thnk on that for a moment how utterly RIDICULOUS a contention that is!!! The fact is that you're just repeating what you were told--no matter how ridiculous and illogical it might be--because the TRUTH is that there's no acceptable answer to the question of why a "loving, merciful" God would allow such things to occur in the first place. And so we board the revolving carousel of religious inanity once more.
I will admit however, that THIS kind of conversation was NOT one that I intended to have. But the point is still valid; that the Citizen's role in printing glowingly euphemistic myth-building propaganda for the Church and Christianity does very little for the memory of any person on whose behalf it is mistakenly generated. I don't expect my opinion on this shall ever be "popular". "
franklin wrote on Mar 9, 2008 11:30 AM:
stevedallas wrote on Mar 9, 2008 11:08 AM:
cm wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:38 AM:
it's the perfect time to prod someone to free themselves from such soporifics. "
Pretty sad, when your atheistic self and those like you-feel the need to "free" children of their God when they are deeply sadden and vulnerable.
You can't get adults to join your click, so you pray on the small children?
Ideals of such sort is how a "predators" mind works.
Is this the kind of people anyone would want around their children? Passing themselves off as music teachers, humanitarians, and wanting a "better" society? NOT!!!!!
Those kinds of actions sickens me!
Do you honestly think that your total lack of disrespect and ideals of "praying on children" have made your parents, family, friends, girlfriend proud?
"
cm wrote on Mar 9, 2008 10:14 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Mar 9, 2008 9:49 AM:
Karl, I usually respect what you have to say, but this time, I think you are out of line. I am not the only non-religious person here to say that to you. Compassion for a family in their time of loss takes precedence over all the rest of the arguments, no matter how misguided you may personally feel they are.
This is where YOUR own beliefs are tested -- if you want others to tolerate your right to not believe, then you must be willing to tolerate the rights of those who DO believe. Debate it when you feel ills are being done by organized religion, by all means, but NOT in a space where family members will be looking in their time of grieving.
At this point, it is totally irrelevant if you (or I) don't think the person was "saved" -- the belief that he has been saved brings great comfort to those of faith at times like this. (And surely we can't deny the man is now saved from the pain and suffering he had during the last months of his life).
True enough, it sometimes happens that a time like this is a test for a person's faith, and sometimes people lose their faith -- but that is something intensely personal and painful and no one should be pushing them one way or the other, not at a time like this. To be opportunistically using the death of a loved one as a lever to try to deliberately turn people from their faith, as you say you think is the thing to do, is just callous and cruel.
Faith is something each person has to find or not inside him- or herself. It is not for you or me to steer. Have more tolerance and compassion and hold your arguments for later, when a decent time has passed, and for a space where the children of the family or even adults in deep pain are not likely to be looking. "
Hillbilly wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:50 AM:
Hillbilly wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:21 AM:
Unknown... wrote on Mar 9, 2008 8:14 AM:
karl L wrote on Mar 9, 2008 4:20 AM:
In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised if one or more of them kids lost their Religion entirely. If what you're saying about a long, dragged-out illness is true, then I think that kinda puts to bed the myth of a "merciful God", don't you? Wouldn't people be better off to be disabused of such nonsense?
Sorry, cm, but I don't think that holding a non-religious point of view should be concealed or hidden during times like this--if anything, it's the perfect time to prod someone to free themselves from such soporifics. "
rdj wrote on Mar 9, 2008 12:43 AM:
cm wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:37 PM:
I agree the town needs alot of improving-but right now when money is tight and prices keep rising TURF is not an essential.
Schools are barely getting by after the cuts done to programs, teachers, and supplies. Most schools themselves are in need of repairs-and lets not even mention the busses!
How can a board justify 3-4 million on turf , lights, sound equipment, and concession stand when local schools don't even have enough english, math, social studies, or science books?
Why are the teachers thoughts?
...maybe this paper should ask more than 2 or 3 of them! "
cm wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:15 PM:
Steve's eulogy was printed in RESPECT for his wife and children during a time they have suffered a terrible, long, dragged out, suffering, cancerous death.
HE and his family deeply believe in GOD and their religion.
For you to post a "bottle-baby rant" where his children will MOST LIKELY see, is totally disrespectful.
It ranks up there with tipping headstones and protesting at a soldiers funeral !!
My mother died very young leaving a 6 and 8 yr old--I can very much relate to what those young children are going thru. It is hard enough for adults to answer the tough daily questions like heaven/angels/GOD/caskets/calling hours/grave/cemetery/when will daddy be back/who will play ball with me/who will mow the lawn/who will fix things/DEATH ?forever??----
just when you think you have them calmed for a minute some idiot adult throws in their "two cents" to make you out as a liar as to your beliefs!
There is a time and a place--that site was NOT the time or the place for your anti-GOD BS especially when it involved children who's hearts are deeply hurting right now!
"
AJ wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:01 PM:
Google Joseph Stiglitz ( a republican, BTW )
"
Unknown... wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:02 PM:
"
me wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:29 PM:
Unknown... wrote on Mar 8, 2008 6:53 PM:
Gator wrote on Mar 8, 2008 6:25 PM:
What I found inappropriate is where you chose to voice your opinion. Your personal religious beliefs are of no interest to me but if you'd like to use this forum to argue with Murray or anyone else that's your prerogative. If I don[t like what you write I simply won't read it. "
brew1234 wrote on Mar 8, 2008 5:42 PM:
born-in-bklyn wrote on Mar 8, 2008 4:16 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Mar 8, 2008 3:23 PM:
BTW, longboard, I have graduated from Cornell (my first MA, among other degrees), and the only school where I didn't get accepted in my life was Princeton. The reason? I called up and asked what was the most important part of my application. I was told "It's WHO writes your letter of recommendation." Period dot. It's WHO you know, beyond how well you perform. Lucky for me, the husband of an undergrad prof taught at Cornell and wanted me there, but there are lots of super-intelligent people who don't "know the right people" who never get the chance. Personally, I don't think that is right. Once I got to Cornell, it was a *cakewalk* compared to my undergrad at Wells, at least in terms of the work. So I keep that in mind -- at Wells, we were encouraged in athletes, but never athletics over academics. That background has stood me in good stead down the years.
Works the same for turf -- Auburn has too many academic problems to be wasting money on artificial turf. Take care of the basics before asking the public to fund the attractive extras, esp. in a community where money is tight for many families.
But, longboard, I agree on one thing -- it wasn't very cool calling athletes "neanderthals" -- I've known way too many intelligent athletes for that, and I know there are kids whose only hope to rise above the circumstances under which they were born were via athletics. Athletics can be almost a religion in its own right -- I know that the values I learned under a few really good coaches made a huge difference in my life and helped me be a better person. Thing is, I didn't need turf or fiscal extras to learn those life-critical lessons, just a d*maned good coach who cared about people reaching their own best potential.
Karl, you know very well I have no interest in religion myself, and was raised in a household where organized religion was intensely disparaged. Yet I can respect others' feelings when it comes to things like loss of a loved one. I don't want to see religion and state mixing, but if the paper wants to reprint George Fearon's very religious eulogy for Steve Netti, I don't see where it hurts you or me. Let them grieve as they will, even if it comes out in public. Save your irritation for organized religion for where it is truly out of line. Seriously, it doesn't hurt you or me that they printed those lines. Let them have their faith and the comfort it gives them. "
nature lover wrote on Mar 8, 2008 3:15 PM:
karl L wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:58 PM:
Think about this--can you tell me one thing i that eulogy which told me ONE thing about Mr Netti? What he accomplished? An illuminating anecdote or story about what how he may have treated a fellow human being who needed help?
Bottom line--The writer USED Mr Netti's death to promote the writer's OWN INTERPRETATION of WHAT HE BELIEVED TO BE the role of Christianity in "making a good man". His eulogy is a promotion of religion, using Mr Netti's death to tell us all how he believes that following the rosary and praying and reading a SPECIFIC VERSION of th Bible means that a man is "good" or can be "better", in his view.
I have said NOTHING disparaging against Mr Netti or his family, so stop trying to land a low blow. If you don't see what I'm trying to point out, you are focusing too much on the fact that,--REGRETTABLY!--a good man has passed on. That fact however, does N-O-T entitle others to promote their religious views at the other's expense. "
longboard315 wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:40 PM:
longboard315 wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:28 PM:
nature lover wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:26 PM:
Gator wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:15 PM:
Gator wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:49 PM:
karl L wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:37 PM:
My comment was not against the family or the children, and eulogies belong in Church, especially one so blatantly religious as that one. Besides, go back and read the second comment I will write there after this--it's a valid point! "
nature lover wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:35 PM:
longboard315 wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:25 PM:
cm wrote on Mar 8, 2008 12:10 PM:
We here all know you don't believe, but to his children --one being 6 yrs old-that do believe in GOD and that their father has gone to Heaven, How cruel of you to state otherwise in an area they are most likely to read!!
Talk about kicking someone when they are down!!! worst yet to children that have just lost their father!
totally shameful, disrepectful and utterly digusting behavior out of an adult!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
Andy B wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:58 AM:
cm wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:51 AM:
If transportation is already a problem how would new turf solve those issues/fees?? "
longboard315 wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:50 AM:
AndyB: Grass surfaces get chewed up quickly especially in our climate in the Northeast US. I played football @ AHS back in the day and after one rain game...just one, the field was DONE and rendered unusable for other teams. Maintenance crews would work on it daily to get it ready for a friday night game. And after the football season, the field was roped off as new seed has to be planted. Waste of time and money. now with Field Turf, no such issues!
for HILLTOP: Youd be suprised who would use the field. Not only for athletcis, but for concerts, ceremonies, marching bands, youth events, etc. (Ive even seen a drama club use a small field turf stadium by having an outdoor stage set up while they acted out Romeo & Juliet at night, it was actually very cool to watch). Anyone or any group who needs a wide open space that can seat hundreds of people. Holland Stadium is a perfect place for that, but with re-growing grass there they would be reluctant to allow people trouncing all over the field.
For Nature Lover: I coudnt agree with you more regarding Academics over Athletics - however do you have any idea of the stringent standards kids have today to get into top academic institutions or an institution of their choice? Not only do kids need excellent grades & test scores, but they need "extra ciriculars"...yes, places like Harvard, MIT, Yale, Brown, and even the SUNY schools require students with such a background...or you dont get in. Dont believe me, call the schools and ask yourself. Schools today want kids that bring several dynamics to the table - they want a well-rounded student that brings color and vibrance to the student body. So whether it be in sports, music, drama, community service, etc. Whatever your nitche is, these kids need the tools and adequate facilities to provide them with such an opportunity. Thus having a multi-functional facility can provide these students with a proper outlet to perform is in fact part of their EDUCATION. I myself used one of these facets to get into a good college on a scholarship (my avenue was athletics, eventhough I had an A average in all of my subjects in HS) which has now led me to a lucrative job & career. Isnt that what you want for your children? My sport paid 50% of my tuition...which was over $50,000 in 4 years. Not too shabby as far as im concerned. And dont be so quick to judge athletes (also known to you as Neanderthals - BTW, very classy). Its not all of our goals to be pro athletes. Most athletes realize that becoming a prois not a vital career choice. However sports can be a tool you can use to get financial grants and support from an institution that wants your services.
So in closing, to all of you nay-sayers here.....take a step back and think for a bit before speaking so harshly on the subject. There are plenty of benefits here. You have a beautiful facility in Holland Stadium thats used sparingly and is under-utilized....and thats the truth of the matter. "
karl L wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:34 AM:
An entry-to-mid level motocross track behind the school, right where the dumb soccer field is--now THAT I'd pay for and support. "
karl L wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:30 AM:
With that in mind, "Liberal" is the BEST thing that one could be.
Better a "Liberal" than a stuffy-headed, grumpy hater. "
born-in-bklyn wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:30 AM:
nature lover wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:20 AM:
vic wrote on Mar 8, 2008 11:05 AM:
stevedallas wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:48 AM:
nature lover wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:28 AM:
Andy B wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:27 AM:
Pentangelli wrote on Mar 8, 2008 10:09 AM:
Once again, Auburn natives are placing the few dollars out of their pockets against the education of children...WAY TO GO LEMMINGS "
Leon Kapowski wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:13 AM:
hilltop wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:11 AM:
longboard315 wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:48 AM:
Unknown... wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:32 AM: