Council to look at dog ordinance

By Christopher Caskey / The Citizen

Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:52 AM EST

AUBURN - A proposed ordinance that would give the city of Auburn more control over its residents' dogs will see some changes before the city council can vote on it.
City officials will revisit a pending dog ordinance Thursday during a work session at the Auburn City Council meeting. Though the public will not be heard during the meeting, counselors will discuss the ordinance and possible revisions, according to city officials.

Corporation Counsel John Rossi said that regulations specific to the breed of a dog will likely be eliminated from the ordinance. Some of its provisions will also been rewritten to conform with the state laws that regulate how dogs are allowed to be treated, according to Rossi.

The ordinance addresses issues such as barking and noise, limits the number and size of dogs some residents can own, and requires constraints such as cages, fences and even muzzles for dogs considered to be violent. It was drafted in response to complaints relating to aggressive dogs and attacks on pets within the city.

The possibility for changes came after city officials received responses from concerned residents and pet-advocacy groups over aspects of the ordinance, including provisions that impose stronger restrictions on pit bulls and Dobermans than other breeds. One of the groups was the American Kennel Club, which sent a critique of the original draft to the city, Rossi said.

“We have made an effort to incorporate suggestions from the Kennel Club and the public in revising the ordinance,” Rossi said Tuesday. “(The city council) is going to discuss it further and see if further revision might be required.”

Councilor Matt Smith said that the issue has generated a lot of public response because dog ownership is an issue that is important to many people in the community. For Smith, it is important that the ordinance takes care of irresponsible dog owners so that neighborhoods are not held captive by threatening dogs, he said. But Smith said he believes provisions limiting the size and number of dogs allowed to be kept in certain residences are too extreme.

“This did turn into a hot topic. It is a quality of life issue for people,” Smith said.

The proposed ordinance would also allow the city to issue citations to residents whose dogs engage in unreasonable howling, barking or other noise. Councilor Thomas McNabb said that the most public feedback he receives concerning dogs relates to such noise.

“People take off in the morning, leave their dogs and just leave food and water for them,” McNabb said. “In the meantime, the dogs howl, and we hear about them.”

Those in violation of the ordinance would receive an initial fine of $20, and subsequent violations within a five-year period would result in fines of $30 for a second, $50 for a third and $100 for a fourth offense.

Auburn Mayor Michael Quill said Tuesday that he had not yet seen changes or new information for the dog ordinance, but both he and City Manager Mark Palesh are aware of the public's concern over it.

“Either everyone will be comfortable with the new language, or members of the council and I will seek further revisions,” Quill said.

Staff writer Christopher Caskey can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 282 or christopher.caskey@lee.net.

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 3 comment(s)

brew1234 wrote on Feb 20, 2008 11:55 PM:

" Who enforces this ordinance? Is there a dog warden to do this or does it fall to the police. If it is the police, it will be a very low priority for them. Does the city have a pooper scooper law? I hear a lot of comments from citizens about dog waste left by negligent pet owners. Should this be part of the ordinance? If it is already a law then enforcement is a problem now. "

Floretta wrote on Feb 20, 2008 3:03 PM:

" How will "unreasonable barking" be defined? A couple of minutes? I know a dog that is only outside for 10 minutes at a time to do his business (6:30 am, 5:30 pm and just after 10 p.m.) and yet his owner has received a complaint for barking (from an anonymous source.) This same animal is 13 years old and never had a barking complaint before the past few months. Same dog, same barking pattern, now all of a sudden he's a problem? This is "unreasonable?" "

Farmer's Gal wrote on Feb 20, 2008 12:20 PM:

" Glad to hear something may be done about neglected animals and the neighbors who have to suffer being witness to their abuse. I hope the ordinance is passed ... and enforced diligently. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!