I'm a proud Republican, because not everyone can be on welfare.
It looks as though the Auburn board of education thinks that if they keep pushing this turf at they taxpayers, they're going to break us down and get their "yes" vote. No, they aren't.
There's a lot of talk about Republicans and conservatives. President Bush was a conservative and look what he has done.
The answer to 'Do you believe the Auburn school district is out of touch with reality when it comes to putting a budget together?'" Yes, I believe they are.
Anyone who tries to sue the firearms industry to the point of it closing doesn't deserve to be president.
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 31 comment(s)
Farmer's Gal wrote on Feb 13, 2008 12:46 PM:
So, the rich have used the influence of their money to manipulate the tax laws so as to protect their "opulence" (a la James Madison) while the poor remain at the mercy of those same laws. Sadly, this is nothing new since the Middle Ages. The only difference is the current level of hypocrisy among Americans who like to believe we live in a fair and democratic society where we care for those less fortunate than we are.
And the working and middle classes bust their humps to give us productivity upon which all the rest is built while slowly having their dream of simple financial stability pulled further and further from their reach.
Yes, we have it better in this country than in many others -- scary, isn't it? "
conservativejerry wrote on Feb 13, 2008 12:41 PM:
Seems like you're hung up on money and the fact maybe that you don't have enough. "From each according to his ability, to each everywhere to his need" was said by Marx and has failed miserably everytime it's been tried. Capitalism has WORKED everywhere it has been tried. I have read if all the money were taken from the wealthy and distributed so that every person in the world had the same amount, withing 20 years the difference in wealth would roughly be the same as before. "
AJ wrote on Feb 13, 2008 10:41 AM:
Source: IRS, Statistics of Income Division, July 2007 "
concerned wrote on Feb 13, 2008 9:11 AM:
stevedallas wrote on Feb 13, 2008 8:07 AM:
mark wrote on Feb 13, 2008 1:55 AM:
auburn4 wrote on Feb 12, 2008 11:02 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Feb 12, 2008 2:25 PM:
People who DON'T read are no better off than those who CAN'T.
Some people seem proud of this sad disability. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Feb 12, 2008 2:19 PM:
AJ wrote on Feb 12, 2008 1:33 PM:
steve w wrote on Feb 12, 2008 12:42 PM:
tlb4 wrote on Feb 12, 2008 10:52 AM:
stick wrote on Feb 12, 2008 10:36 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Feb 12, 2008 7:52 AM:
I know how you feel, AJ -- it's very well entrenched. I've traced the history of the formal, legal consolidation of the power of the wealthy elite from the time of John I, right through our Founding Fathers who wrote laws to strictly control corporations at the same time they were strengthening their own power as the propertied elite, down to the present times.
The hopeful points are peoples' movements against this trend which were successful -- Abolition, Women's Suffrage, the early labor Unions and Civil Rights. Not all of them have remained truly people's movements, nor remained entirely successful, but in their times, they were each a strong set-back to "The Machine."
If you really look closely at Santa Clara County vs. Southern Pacific Railroad in 1886, where a Supreme Court Justice declared that corporations are persons with the same rights as natural persons -- that (according to him) this was an indisputable fact and they would not allow it to be discussed -- that is a root of much evil in our world today. Take away that obscene misinterpretation of our Constitution and Bill of Rights and you take away the shield which allows corporations to do what they want with impunity and without regard to the effects and consequences on natural living persons and our environment. ("Regulations" are a joke).
The CELDF has a plan for communities to get the ball rolling on that change, and already, as you know, some hundred or more in Pennsylvania and a few other states have begun. When the snowball gets big enough, the Supreme Court will have to reconsider -- and that's the time to press for a return to justice.
Can it work? Probably only an outside chance. But it's the best plan anyone has so far. "
AJ wrote on Feb 11, 2008 9:44 PM:
President Bush drew great applause during his State of the Union address last month when he called on Congress to allow U.S. troops to transfer their unused education benefits to family members. A week later, however, when Bush submitted his $3.1 trillion federal budget to Congress, he included no funding for such an initiative.
Gee, who woulda thunk it?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/08/AR2008020804136.html "
Unknown... wrote on Feb 11, 2008 8:24 PM:
DD wrote on Feb 11, 2008 6:41 PM:
DD wrote on Feb 11, 2008 6:39 PM:
tlb4 wrote on Feb 11, 2008 5:20 PM:
AJ wrote on Feb 11, 2008 4:06 PM:
"
AJ wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:57 PM:
Anyhow, I've been comfortably self-employed for the last 10 years so I don't need any job offers. Unless you have one for me that pays 100,000+ a year. You're a real generous republican type right? "
Unknown... wrote on Feb 11, 2008 3:13 PM:
GiveMeLiberty wrote on Feb 11, 2008 1:50 PM:
The more I read from you, the more convinced I become that you are a fellow (small L) libertarian.
"
tlb4 wrote on Feb 11, 2008 1:48 PM:
mriracato wrote on Feb 11, 2008 1:01 PM:
nature lover wrote on Feb 11, 2008 12:51 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Feb 11, 2008 12:23 PM:
Unknown... wrote on Feb 11, 2008 12:22 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Feb 11, 2008 11:50 AM:
Time for change indeed -- and well overdue for a change for the better. Put a lid on corporate control of our government and let's get back to the good of the people. "
chris van note wrote on Feb 11, 2008 11:48 AM:
AJ wrote on Feb 11, 2008 10:44 AM:
And FYI, Bush is not a conservative at all. He's an extreme radical pro-corporatist and warmonger. You could also ascribe the word "heartless" to him. "