Why have the CCC teachers been without a contract for four years now? The excellent professionals deserve a decent wage package, just like the rest of the world.
Not everybody uses computers and I wouldn't use a computer to read The Citizen anyway.
The attack on John McCain's war record by the neocons is reprehensible. Senator McCain is a hero and anyone who supports the neocons will get what they deserve.
It seems kind of weird that after the first of the year with the new local administration, that Two Cents is no longer in the paper.
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.



The Citizens' Say
There are 52 comment(s)
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 24, 2008 11:26 AM:
Either that, or we just have to wish for a huge plague to kill off about 7/8 of the earth's population so we don't consume and destroy so much. Now THAT is unrealistic.
As I've said before, I'm against industrial wind turbines, not against wind energy, which in and of itself is indeed clean.
But I still stand by this creed: The lesser of two evils is still evil.
"
AJ wrote on Jan 24, 2008 11:24 AM:
Solar is/was only one aspect of Carter's energy program. It had many components. Conservation was one of them. Perhaps the only thing about his energy program that was IMO overkill, was the 55 mph speed limit. "
cm wrote on Jan 24, 2008 10:51 AM:
brew1234 wrote on Jan 24, 2008 10:27 AM:
AJ wrote on Jan 24, 2008 10:26 AM:
What we need is to resurrect Carter's energy program in some form - the one which Reagan promptly discarded when he got into office. Had we followed that program we wouldn't be in this mess now.
We are very close to a point where solar is becoming competitive to many forms of energy production, and without the huge external costs.
I would bet that solar would have been competitive in the last 15 years or so had Carter's program had been left in place. The energy companies HATE the idea of decentralized energy though, which is why we are where we are.
By the way, for anyone interested, check out Nicola Tesla. He seems to be a man that history forgot. One of the most prolific inventors ever, he was able to produce energy out of thin air. The government immediately confiscated all of his belongings upon his death.
"
carlred wrote on Jan 24, 2008 9:55 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 24, 2008 9:41 AM:
Ernest J. Sternglass has written several books. The one you read might have been one of these:
Low-level radiation (1972 -- 36 yrs ago)
Secret fallout : low-level radiation from Hiroshima to Three Mile Island. (1981 -- 27 yrs ago)
The enemy within : the high cost of living near nuclear reactors : breast cancer, AIDS, low birthweights, and other radiation-induced immune deficiency effects [by Jay M. Gould -- co-authored by members of the Radiation and Public Health Project, incl. Dr. Sternglass](1996 -- 12 yrs ago)
Dr. Sternglass has contributed to these related titles (as well as writing a couple books on the Big Bang theory):
Diet for the atomic age [by Sara Shannon -- Introduction by Dr. Sternglass] (1987)
The Petkau effect : nuclear radiation, people, and trees [by Ralph Graeub -- Introduction by Dr. Sternglass] (1992)
Three Mile Island : turning point [by William Keisling -- Afterword by Dr. Sternglass](1980)
It's handy to have access to the world's biggest bibliographic database!
But you can only read so many of these kinds of books -- it's just so depressing to get the down and dirty details of how badly we've destroyed our own health and environment. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 24, 2008 9:22 AM:
The lesser of two evils is still evil. Keep looking. "
cm wrote on Jan 24, 2008 8:30 AM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 24, 2008 7:13 AM:
brew1234 wrote on Jan 24, 2008 1:08 AM:
AJ wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:31 PM:
I read a book nearly 30 years ago by a physicist from Lawrence Livermore laboratory. His name was Dr Ernest Sternglass. Not well known, but had impeccable credentials. He studied radiation fallout patterns from various sources based on wind conditions, and came up with some startling statistics. If I remember correctly, we in this area have been exposed to a great deal of fallout from the Nevada test detonations. The book showed escalating cancer rates, deformation, and retardation rates were a result of this fallout.
I think he has written new work on the subject, and I forget the name of the original book. I do remember the impact it made on my thinking about nuclear energy and how this invisible force affects us all. "
karl L wrote on Jan 23, 2008 6:41 PM:
The reason I am still currently against this is because I cannot, in my head, justify the use of monies--whether or NOT it is from a grant designed for that purpose--for benefiting a small constituency of the school population when the school needs so much more in terms of funding.
I also can't help feel that this issue is being driven on the heels of a championship season which is presenting an opportunistic attempt to ram home an issue WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN REJECTED BY THE TAXPAYERS IN A PLEBISCITE!!
That strikes me as deceitful and unfair, and reeks of something rotten in the council's motivations.
On a practical and realistic side, there's that matter Jerry brought up about the interest being paid and the way that the bill will be distributed and paid. No sir; I don't like that, either.
High School sports has become BIG business lately and in my opinion, to the detriment of education. I can't help but feel that we don't need to be encouraging sports at the expense of academics--which seems to be what happens inevitably with many athletes who excel and are courted for their physical prowess rather than their brains. This whole issue has the taint of that issue for me.
The "kicker" though is that $597,000 concession stand. I will NEVER be able to get my head around that. "Frivolous spending" pretty much encapsulates my opinion on that.
Anyhoo--gotta admit that I don't have ALL the facts on this one. But the ones I feel that I do know cause me to weigh in against it--and then again, there's always that plebiscite issue. "
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 23, 2008 2:43 PM:
Citizen_Webitor wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:23 PM:
Read all about it on the Webitor Blog, click here. "
Jim wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:13 PM:
karl L wrote on Jan 23, 2008 11:32 AM:
I will be voting and taking my girlfriend with me! And giving a "heads up" to my students who are of voting age! "
cm wrote on Jan 23, 2008 10:26 AM:
cm wrote on Jan 23, 2008 10:23 AM:
ICsaidtherabbit wrote on Jan 23, 2008 9:23 AM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:56 AM:
20+ years ago, I did my student teaching at Auburn High. It was quite an experience and taught me that I don't have what it takes to keep a classroom full of hormonal teenagers under control -- so I changed career plans.
But apropos of this discussion, let me tell a little story about my time in Auburn High School.
I had two classes of 2nd year students in a foreign language. One was in the morning, and one was the last period of the day. The last period class, even when the strict middle-aged male master teacher was in the room, was always on the edge of going completely off the rails. The majority of the teacher's energy had to go into: SHUT UP AND SIT DOWN! which cut into any time I (or the Master Teacher) could spend TEACHING. There were a handful of "good students" in that class, who were trying to get an education, but their very best scores were only comparable to middling scores of the students in the morning class. It wasn't because they weren't as sharp -- it's because their educations were being shortchanged by the behavior of their classmates.
So, cm is right -- kids who come to school ready to learn are getting shortchanged because teachers have to spend so much time on discipline that they don't have as much time to put into teaching, and it gets worse as the kids get older. Smaller class size would help, and paying teachers adequately for the grief they have to endure is also necessary or the good teacher will go elsewhere.
But bottom line is that one group of kids come into school and make the schools places where it is hard to teach or learn, and eventually drag everyone else down with them -- the "good" kids, the teachers, the test scores and all of it. Eventually, even kids who would have done well come to hate school because it is a miseerable place to be.
Like so many other things, the whole system is broken, and a band-aid patch isn't going to cure it -- certainly throwing money at football turf isn't going to help the schools in any fundamental way. "
brew1234 wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:39 AM:
karl L wrote on Jan 22, 2008 7:47 PM:
karl L wrote on Jan 22, 2008 7:39 PM:
You know there seems to be a general resentment of posters on blogs like this from people who resent when an individual has done their homework or can eloquently elucidate a position or opinion. I'm on another blog--boy if you think THIS one is hostile!...--and some of the posters there absolutely cannot STAND when you cite facts and references that refute their contentions.
There are also the "old lions" of the blogs--people who have been there a while and resent another "young male" coming into the "pride" and getting some of the attention. It must go back to high school, when they didn't feel up to snuff and resentful of the smarter kids in class, and so they take it out here in cyberspace?
Don't worry, FG--the fact that they've targeted you as well means you're doing something right!
I have also inquired at the Citizen what the purpose was of registering names if they couldn't put a stop to phony posters? I would think that they could do that at this stage? "
Andy B wrote on Jan 22, 2008 4:33 PM:
cm wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:49 PM:
Andy B wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:33 PM:
Andy B wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:31 PM:
Read my post. Your average professional employee works 45 to 51 weeks a year 5 days a week. 225 to 255 days a year minus holidays.
Most do not get any tuition assistance for their Masters degrees. That only happens thru special programs for low income districts. That is usually balanced out by the fact that starting teachers in those districts start at 10 to 30 percent less than that 37K Figure you used. "
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:17 PM:
Change is needed on this board, they are on the fast track to ruin, and Mike Stearns, Bill Andre, and the rest of the happy go lucky bobble heads are in lock step with an administrator that is plainly over his head. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:11 PM:
Can't help it if people have short attention spans and brains not big enough to wrap around issues which take more than a sound byte to get across. "
stevedallas wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:04 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 22, 2008 2:36 PM:
MISSEY1941 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 2:29 PM:
They have Christmas vacation, Spring vacation, Summer vacation,and every holiday off.They work 187 days per year.
Many are paid while they are seeking their higher degrees.
If you want't to feel sorry for teachers, feel sorry for the teachers in the south,who make $25,000 per year and have no where near the benefits. "
speakup wrote on Jan 22, 2008 1:56 PM:
vic wrote on Jan 22, 2008 1:35 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 22, 2008 1:13 PM:
I say invest in our teachers, hire the teachers that are needed to fix the problems this district is facing. Once this is done, then maybe we can address spending millions on pie in the sky items. Or maybe the board can cut an administrator or two to get some extra money. This is where we are top heavy, we have too many chiefs and not enough indians. "
aubres wrote on Jan 22, 2008 12:02 PM:
Andy B wrote on Jan 22, 2008 11:56 AM:
That being said Teachers work 9 months a year not 6 months. They receive only 3 vacation days a year that never increases due to seniority. A work day(which never ends when the kids get on the bus)is almost always more than 8hrs.
Add to that the fact that they have 6 years of post highschool education. That cost anywhere from 90k to 150k to complete. "
cm wrote on Jan 22, 2008 11:45 AM:
conservativejerry wrote on Jan 22, 2008 11:34 AM:
where to start. Teachers are "under payed"? I believe the word is "underpaid". The reason musicians, actors and ball players make lots of money is WE PAY TO SEE THEM. When they don't perform, they're history. I believe teachers should make more too, but try and get rid of a bad teacher. Good luck with the NEA. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 22, 2008 11:14 AM:
(Made a few typos today too, but none which reversed my meaning like the one noted above). "
vic wrote on Jan 22, 2008 10:34 AM:
MISSEY1941 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:11 AM:
What private sector job pays that for 6 months work?
If a teacher is a good teacher not just a tenured teacher going along for the ride, pay them $100,000 per year. At least the children would benefit from all the $$$$$$$$$$$$ we throw at the system!!! "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 22, 2008 8:47 AM:
In a nutshell, the author describes the myriad of carcinogens in our environment, many of them unregulated or unchecked by any kind of goverment oversight.
There are also lots of "endocrin disrputors" and other hormone-mimicking chemicals in our environment which absolutely cause a whole additional set of illnesses (and which, imho, probably contribute more to American obesity even than fast food).
Agribusiness is a big contributor to these pollutants in our air, water and soil, but they are protected by the so-called "right to farm" laws and by the DEC who won't even come out to check on complaints, and who only inspected less than 10% of CAFOs in a 5 year period from 2000-2005.
When you hear that your tax dollars are going to cover up some big corporate farm's liquid manure pond because the fumes are toxic, you should be paying attention. Those fumes are still toxic as they spread that liquid manure on the fields near your homes -- as the gases are "lost to the environment" along with what goes into the soil and is washed into our water. They overspread far beyond what the crops take up as nutrients, and there's lots of other gop in there besides just cow manure -- cleaning products and antibiotics, etc etc.
(Not to mention that it just isn't right that the tax payers should be paying to clean up the waste of corporations in pursuit of profit -- they should have to pay to clean up their own waste).
But there are also a lot of those corporate interests right here in our communities who have worked for years to obsfucate the source of these toxins in our environment, so good luck proving it in a court of law.
Meanwhile, we are breathing and drinking and otherwise absorbing all these bad things into our bodies every day. "
candi wrote on Jan 22, 2008 6:18 AM:
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 10:17 PM:
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 10:10 PM:
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 10:07 PM:
Dan W wrote on Jan 21, 2008 9:13 PM:
Define the rest of the world? Just in the liberal world of Higher Education? Of the real world that has to pay taxes to support it? I never had a "contract" in my life. I get raises baised on merit, new term for you people that are supported by the taxpayers. Hope you all have to join the real world soon. "
stevedallas wrote on Jan 21, 2008 6:56 PM:
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 4:20 PM:
nature lover wrote on Jan 21, 2008 3:13 PM: