AUBURN -- The proposed capital project for the Auburn Enlarged City School District will officially move to the next step.
The board of education voted 7-2 Tuesday to send the estimated $14.9 million project to engineers and architects for further planning and study.
A proposal on the capital project, which currently is 87 percent aidable from the state, is expected to come before voters in May.
Board president David Lansford and board members Sam Giangreco and Bill Andre voiced their support of including Holland Stadium into the project, stating that the cost would ultimately be minimal to the taxpayer and would provide for students and Cayuga County, a unique stadium that would be a venue for sporting events as well as a gathering place for people.
Board members Fred Cornelius and Joe Leogrande dissented and specifically cited Holland Stadium as the reason for their no vote.
"Our priorities need to be technology and moving forward in those aspects, which I know we are trying to do," Cornelius said. "I am in favor of the turf field in an area of the school district where all students will be able to utilize it. I don't believe that Holland Stadium is that place and although I do see that there are necessary renovations to be done and that those necessary renovations should be a priority one for this next year, I don't believe that we can in good conscience say that synthetic turf is a priority one ..."
For more, read The Citizen Wednesday
A proposal on the capital project, which currently is 87 percent aidable from the state, is expected to come before voters in May.
Board president David Lansford and board members Sam Giangreco and Bill Andre voiced their support of including Holland Stadium into the project, stating that the cost would ultimately be minimal to the taxpayer and would provide for students and Cayuga County, a unique stadium that would be a venue for sporting events as well as a gathering place for people.
Board members Fred Cornelius and Joe Leogrande dissented and specifically cited Holland Stadium as the reason for their no vote.
"Our priorities need to be technology and moving forward in those aspects, which I know we are trying to do," Cornelius said. "I am in favor of the turf field in an area of the school district where all students will be able to utilize it. I don't believe that Holland Stadium is that place and although I do see that there are necessary renovations to be done and that those necessary renovations should be a priority one for this next year, I don't believe that we can in good conscience say that synthetic turf is a priority one ..."
For more, read The Citizen Wednesday
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 13 comment(s)
tlb4 wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:25 PM:
School and facility improvements(turf placement) have nothing to do with supplying books to your students. If parents are unhappy with textbooks or lack thereof than take that issue up with the teacher or specific department head. Voting No to a project like this will not provide a new textbook. Do you really all believe that the business man Mr. Morgan spoke of will move his business out of Auburn if this project passes? The extra 90 cents per month in crease will not be the last straw for him it will more likely be the rising gas prices,rising energy costs and rising insurance premiums for his workers. Mr. Morgan please don't mislead us by suggesting that if this renovation project you are so against passes suddenly businesses are going to move out of the area. "
Jim wrote on Jan 23, 2008 12:03 PM:
karl L wrote on Jan 23, 2008 11:30 AM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 23, 2008 9:49 AM:
I also find it interesting that Tony Tesorio would support the project, Tony is a man that used his position to help secure a job for his wife, so it is no surprise he would support the hand that feeds him. I also find it interesting that a local business man complained it was difficult for him to remain in business because of high taxes. He informed the board that if taxes are not controlled he will be forced to move his company out of state. He was ignored and the proposal was moved forward.
I am glad they bundled the proposals, they all need to be rejected. The bids are way too high and the costs are placing additional burdens on an already over taxed community. "
stick wrote on Jan 23, 2008 9:13 AM:
tlb4 wrote on Jan 23, 2008 8:55 AM:
vic wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:42 AM:
forrest wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:24 AM:
stevedallas wrote on Jan 23, 2008 6:44 AM:
hipsterdoofus wrote on Jan 23, 2008 1:17 AM:
And tome8698, the previous public vote on a turf project was for a practice field behind the HS, not at Holland Stadium.
I personally love real grass fields, and would love to see the stadium undergo major renovation while still maintaining fresh sod. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem practical. No sod field (especially with our weather) would be able to endure all the various hosting of sport and non-sport events that a turf field potentially could, especially given the maintanence budget limitations that it would be subject to. The existing grass field barely supports the limited use it sees now.
"
ben wrote on Jan 22, 2008 10:17 PM:
tome8689 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:48 PM:
longboard315 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:38 PM: