Who's in charge? We the people! Then why did only one fourth of Auburn's population show up for the last voting session?
I really enjoyed many of the articles The Citizen reported on in 2007. I wish that instead of all politics we also had columnists with views on schools, and not to mention what is the most important focus of today -- health.
The new school budget is so ridiculous -- check out what it costs for doorknobs, what they're paying to paint lockers. There's zero for classroom teachers, which is the only place they should invest the money.
We have a former mayor that's got a piece in The Citizen, and now we have the city manager of Auburn that's got a piece in The Citizen. Hah! That's really great.
Isn't there a lawyer in this county that's supposed to be working for the taxpayers. What I'm pertaining to is Mr. Chick getting all this money that he isn't working for.
I agree with the writer regarding the parking kiosks because negotiating snow banks and walking across parking lots to reach these is a big inconvenience. You're lucky if you can cross the snow banks downtown just to get to a meter in front of your vehicle, so you are not doing the retailers downtown any justice.
Two Cents will be updated online as new submissions are called or e-mailed. To contribute new Two Cents items, please call 253-5311 ext. 292 or e-mail twocents@lee.net.
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 46 comment(s)
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 22, 2008 11:13 AM:
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 2:47 PM:
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 21, 2008 2:01 PM:
When I lived right in the Village of Aurora, the water prices were very high while the water was not reliable -- the processing plant was ancient and every time there was a good hard rain, all we got was brown muddy water from our taps. If I hadn't worked at the college, we wouldn't have known there was an order not to use the water -- what a mess.
Then I moved to the outskirts. First place had a terrific well, clean water and even with 6 apartments, we never once ran it out. But it was too small and there were problems with the neighbors.
Now I live in a place where I was warned when I moved in not to drink the water because it is polluted with e-coli (as are 4 of the 6 wells in my area -- the other 2 may also be, I just don't know the people who live there). So, I have all the water I could want for no cost -- but you can't drink it (I don't trust that boiling it first stuff except in a real pinch).
I think clean water will be an issue right here at home within our children's lifetimes, just like in third world countries, if we don't start taking such things seriously now.
I know it's my hobbyhorse, but there it is again. Wells were polluted all over when the countryside was covered with small family farms -- it's the need of these big corporate agribusiness ventures with their thousands of animals producing hundreds of thousands of gallons of liquid manure which they overspread on the fields that gets into the wells and down the creeks into the lake.
If I had all the answers, I think I'd feel obligated to run for office. Thankfully, as far as that goes, I don't. (I really wouldn't want to hold office). But this much I can give as an answer to the question about changing the system -- we have to take back our rights to government from the corporations who do NOT have our interests at heart. "Regulating" industry has not worked -- they've found ways around all that. We need to take back our right to say NO to corporations. It won't be easy, and may not ever happen, but I sincerely believe that therein lies the crux of a great many other issues we face in our country today. Start there, and I think we can cure a lot of ills.
MHO. "
hmmmm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 1:02 PM:
All these billion and billions going to this is absolutly crazy our country is in shambles and I see this and im not even one of the people struggling to make ends meet
"
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 10:02 AM:
YET I understood, when I first moved out of state-our water bill at the house we rented was 400.00 a month. We bought a home in an unincorporated area and the water bill is about 30.00 a month, jumping to about 80.00 when we re-fill the pool.
If my dad was alive his grandkids would NEVER bath in AUBURN! lol. "
cm wrote on Jan 21, 2008 9:45 AM:
You are right FG about the SYSTEM needing repair-starting with the wicks law.So the ? is how does one go about changing that?
Jerry is right about the costs-and the state not using BIDDING.
BUT just because a project goes to the lowest bid does not mean it will be lower either. Hubby bids jobs in construction, they always go over budget! AGAIN a law needs to be changed there too giving the company a number to not exceed or the company bites the bullet on it!
We have offered like some said earlier to aid the school in small projects like painting a room..1st you need to be background checked-then licensed-and of course insured-the district trying to avoid possible lawsuits if someone is injured. AGAIN maybe another law needed or changed, where the willing are willing to sign off if injured while aiding a school needed project?
Basically, voices are needing to be heard and not just on this forum but at the voting booths!
or learn more from the AMISH who seem to build their own without state help and state laws! When they are in need as a WHOLE they provide. "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 21, 2008 7:30 AM:
John from Liverpool -- welcome, you must be a newcomer. Badly timed lights and the time and fuel they waste is a long-time complaint in this forum. Some lights are appropriate for the "trip" lights you describe, at some times of day, others are not, but in very large cities, they set up the whole range of traffic signals to be in sync with each other to encourage people to drive the speed limit. When they work as they should, a person should never have to stop for more than one light if traveling in one direction and staying at the speed limit. Saves gas and reduces pollution as well as the savings in the areas of time and frustration. But Auburn isn't likely to ever do anything about it -- it's costly, and as you see, there's plenty of debate about money for the schools.
Once again, I think I see less disagreement here than it might appear. The problem seems to be mainly the absurd prices for things as small as doorknobs -- some folks make the case that there's this Wickes Law (over-)regulating such things (in typical NYS fashion) which drives prices up exponentially. Some of the repairs may be needed, others are perks, but all have inflated price tags, and in a community which can hardly be called the employment capital of the Western World, this is a serious chunk of money.
Sounds like the system needs repair more then the doorknobs....
(BTW, we have key-pad door knobs where I work. They often jam or have other problems. We had one replaced and it cost over $500, and it works no better than the old one. And when we have to have Maintenance out to repair one, they charge the Library for it, so I hear what you're saying about absurd inflation of prices for hardware and maintenance in education).
Hey -- THE GIANTS ARE GOING TO THE SUPERBOWL!!! I can't believe it. Amazing -- I'm so proud of those guys. How's that for some positive news -- they rather remind me of Auburn High School's championship team last year -- not expected to win anything.... "
karl L wrote on Jan 20, 2008 8:49 PM:
It's still costing us over a billion dollars a week, there's no political settlement anywhere near on the horizon, half the candidates are talking about keeping troops there as an occupying force, waste and fraud have/are still raping the American taxpayer, and --oh yeah--207 was the deadliest year yet.
Surge, splurge, smirge--whatever. As soon as the troop levels are reduced, nothing is going to be seen to have changed. The balance of troops there is putting our nation at risk; god forbid that we have a conflagration requiring intervention break out somewhere. Only a fool would look at the war in this latest phase and see it as "positive". Of course, then there's always Mr Coulter.....oh look! He's coooooming!!!... "
JohnLiverpool wrote on Jan 20, 2008 8:32 PM:
Additionally, the short two block or is it three block area on North Street between the West Bound Arterial (Holiday Inn) and Genesee Street needs to be better controlled with the elimination of LEFT HAND turns to and from Dill Street/Loop roads from either direction. Also, LEFT HAND turns should be eliminated from either direction at the Four Corners of North/South/Geneseee St. Right hand turns will induce an extra minute or two of driving time but could dramatically improve traffic safety and traffic flow. Lastly, is the traffic signal at North Division and Perrine Street really needed? What is the annual cost of electricity just for that not needed signal? "
Bobbo wrote on Jan 20, 2008 6:58 PM:
steve w wrote on Jan 20, 2008 2:33 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 20, 2008 2:30 PM:
As for comparing concession stands to homes, and the cost between the two is not apples and oranges as you would like to have us believe, but a actual comparison as to what we taxpayers have been duped into believing is the "norm" for public work. When in actuality it is so far out of whack, someone should be prosecuted for not only making those bids, but for accepting those bids. But it is what it is and the only defense the public has in defending itself against this type of abuse is to be made aware of the what the schools want to spend and how much they want to spend and they cost broken down accordingly. This is what I did and this is what I will continue to do.
I am also well aware of the wicks law, this is why BOCESS cannot build the district a new concession stand and I understand the role of the BOE, my argument is and will be the cost of the items put forth for consideration.
Imagine if you can when a broadcasters booth costs more to construct that the very home most of us are living in or when a concession stand costs more than the homes on an entire neighborhood block, and imagine a community pressed hard by economics being asked to absorb these costs, and continue to give no matter what you, as an individual family, has already given.
I was in line to pay my water bill and I listened to an elderly widow complaining about her water bill, she asked how she was supposed to live paying these high costs? She was told to complain down the hall to the Mayors office. This is the real factor behind what I do, these are real people with real issues, not apples and oranges, people are struggling just to keep their heads above water, yet there are people that ignore them and can only see what the elite see. So excuse me if I complain down the hall about the costs associated with JD Pabis and the BOE wish list. As a voter, and a taxpayer that is my right, and I will continue to exercise that right, because I want future generations to prosper here, but that may be a pipe dream, because the high school enrollment is down the city's population is down. People will not be able to afford to live here, and then who's fault will that be?
"
Jim wrote on Jan 20, 2008 1:14 PM:
The BOE may have been asked to vote on this the same day it was presented, but they did not. That's not the action of a "bobble head board." (The repeated use of that phrase, by the way, speaks volumes about the credibility of your critique.)
When comparing concession stands to private residences, you're comparing apples and oranges. State and local codes classify different building uses in different ways. A concession stand built by the district will require a higher standard of construction than a home. State building and fire codes will dictate materials, sprinklers, air handling standards that must be met. A concession stand (at least one with food preparation) can't be constructed of wood. Again...apples and oranges.
School projects must be bid in accordance with the Wickes Law. That means there will be as many as five prime contractors and all laborers will be paid prevailing wage. Home building is done by a single prime and, usually, with the exception of a pair of trades, with non-union laborers. The Wickes Law (which I'd like to see repealed) adds a multiplier to the cost of public construction. I don't agree with it but you can't just wish it away. It'll take an act of the legislature. Until that happens, that is the context within which public projects get constructed. We all know it's not a great way to do things but it does nothing constructive to just wish it weren't so.
Finally, the public (those that bother to vote - I do) will decide whether this project goes ahead - not the BOE. The BOE was elected to make the decisions regarding what project is put in front of the voters. We the voters delegated that responsibility to them when we elected them. Imagine the circus it would be if the general public were given line by line input on a project as complex as this one. Chaos. This system works because we the voters have the final say - when we elect our BOE and when we vote yes or no on this capital referendum. "
carlred wrote on Jan 20, 2008 12:59 PM:
www.jmlock.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=242 "
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 20, 2008 12:23 PM:
I understand this proposal is in the beginning stages, however, with all due respect to Mr Pentangelli, this is the time to address the proposal, because if there is no public input, this bobble head board will attempt to ram this down the throats of the taxpayers whether we like it or not. I also understand the administration pressed the board into voting on it the same day the proposal was presented to them. This was totally unacceptable. How many homes could be built or purchased with the price attached to the concession stand? How many homes could be purchased with the price tag associated with the press box. I find it amazing that a brand new home could be built cheaper than a concession stand, I wonder why that is, after all union labor is used in both cases. I think the big difference is the taxpayers has deep pockets, so the price is no object, lets boost the cost up, lets make a buck at our expense. Shame on that administration and shame on that board for not recognizing this from the onset. The public should always come first when making decisions of this magnitude, as such it should have been rejected by the board and those administrators should have been directed to bring a more realistic proposal or to bring none at all "
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 20, 2008 11:24 AM:
Jim wrote on Jan 20, 2008 11:17 AM:
First...this project (as I understand it) is still in the very early planning stages. The budget numbers being discussed are the result of an architect/engineer's planning level estimate. At this stage of the process no design work has been done, no specifications have been written, no bids have been let, and no contracts awarded. They are very early in the process and the professional designers are making educated guesses based upon past projects to determine a planning level budget.
Second...This is a capital project. The State Education Department funds school districts through two sources. One is capital, the other operating. Capital funds (used for building construction, repair, furniture, and equipment) can't be used for operating expenses (teachers salaries, supplies, heating expenses, etc.). So not doing this capital project will net exactly zero dollars for use in educating our children.
Third...I don't know the particulars as it relates to the Auburn situation, but most districts will be paying on multiple bonds at any given time. Remember, school districts are subject to borrowing limits. Most never get anywhere near that ceiling.
Finally...I have nothing to do with the Auburn district other than paying my taxes. I do, however, have experience (through my work) with the process currently being engaged by the BOE and administration. They appear to be handling it competently and professionally.
It is irresponsible on the part of ill-informed observers to criticize based upon some out of context information. I agree that some of these costs seem high to the average homeowner. However, federal, state, and local codes dictate what particular features that doorknob has to have. The Wickes Law dictates that it has to be installed by workers making prevailing (read union) wages. Is $250 too much for a doorknob? It is if you're replacing the one on your back door. It's not if you're replacing one in a school building. This fact can't be changed by your local BOE. These are global problems that need to be addressed at the state and federal levels. "
nature lover wrote on Jan 20, 2008 10:25 AM:
Pentangelli wrote on Jan 20, 2008 10:13 AM:
puzzled1 wrote on Jan 20, 2008 8:59 AM:
Yikes wrote on Jan 19, 2008 7:58 PM:
If you don't mind, may I call you Steve? This way, we'd be on the "same" page. I think.
Anyway Steve, regardless of your FUZZY math, it'll become clear before the public is asked to vote. "
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 19, 2008 6:45 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 19, 2008 6:07 PM:
Yikes wrote on Jan 19, 2008 5:53 PM:
First of all, regarding personal attacks, there's quite a difference between suggesting someone has been "hitting the bottle" and someone who has been using "fuzzy" math. The main difference being that "fuzzy" math can be proven on here as a matter of public record.
If you choose to e-mail Jerry at the address he posted, please ask him how much NYS contributed to that $15 million dollar figure he chooses to post. You'll find that the district (local) portion of these costs are a pittance of the overall $15 million expenditure.
I agree with much of what Jerry is stating in regards to the economy and a local over-burdened tax base. However, I'll never agree with anyone who uses inflated figures and "fuzzy" math to try and justify or scare a local community into thinking their best interests aren't being served by local officials.
"
nature lover wrote on Jan 19, 2008 5:47 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 19, 2008 4:04 PM:
The fact remains, we are just entering into the second year of a 15 year bond over the last capitol improvement project. Once again, the monies received are not paid up front where we are paying just 20% of what is requested. Instead it is doled out over the life span of the note, so we are in FACT paying interest on the whole sum.
As for my math, it has nothing to do with MY MATH this is a matter of public record, anyone, and I mean anyone can and should look at what the district is wanting us to pay for. I stand by my assertion that we are getting raked over the coals.
Karl is 100% right on this as is everyone else that is questioning the boards logic in bringing this to a public vote. You however, "Paul" don't pay our taxes, you have nothing to say what so ever about what we do, or do not want. You let personalities cloud your better judgement because as they say politics is politics. But as for me, until the day I leave the city I was born in I will question my elected representatives and make sure what they are proposing to the public is for the betterment of the public and not for some egotistical reason, I will ensure they have the public in mind with every decision and not because they want to have their name engraved on some bronze plaque. Vote NO!
If anyone, and I mean anyone wants a copy of the spending proposal all you have to do is ask and I will give you one FREE of charge
email me at cayugacommunity@yahoo.com "
Yikes wrote on Jan 19, 2008 3:38 PM:
Nature Lover - Do you always resort to personal attacks when you can't intelligently debate an issue? I'm NOT a member of the BOE nor have I ever played one on TV. However, I have been around long enough to understand Jerry's "fuzzy" math.
Jerry's latest post in having readers believe that the district spent 14 million dollars last year on repairs is a bit misleading at best. Once again, Jerry forgot to add in state funding to paint an accurate picture of district spending.
"
karl L wrote on Jan 19, 2008 3:09 PM:
Yikes--I see your point, but it still rankles me to no end!
Jerry's obviously done the homework on this one... "
nature lover wrote on Jan 19, 2008 2:51 PM:
Yikes wrote on Jan 19, 2008 2:21 PM:
With that written, district taxpayers are in fact getting quite a bang for their buck. I firmly believe it's unjust to blame Mr. Pabis or the BOE in wanting to make capital improvements for a rate of 20 cents on the dollar. Personally, I think it makes perfect fiscal sense.
Lastly, if you're upset over the exorbitant cost of materials and services through bids, please contact the State of NY where the blame should be placed. Until then, that is the cost they're willing to pay and if Auburn doesn't accept it, another school district happily will.
"
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:19 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:12 PM:
1.) $746,000 for a parking lot
2.) $310,000 for 6 light poles
3.) $597,000 for a concession
stand/locker room
4.) $149,000 for a rubber cover
on a jogging track
5.) $2.1 million for artificial
turf
6.) $86,500 for a sports caster
booth
7.) $64,000 for lights in the
new parking lot
7.) $110,00 for a sound system
8.) $77,000 to repair new fencing
9.) $2.5 million for new computerized
projectors in very classroom
Last year this district spent 14 million dollars for building repairs, it is only into the second year of debt with another 13 years to go. This board and their leader is mortgaging this district to death, and placing additional burdens on an already over burdened taxpayer. Auburn and the surrounding communities are taxed so much people are leaving. Thus less people are here to carry that debt load. Sewer rates have increased over 20% from last year alone. The price for gas has doubled, economic advisers are warning us of a recession, the stock market has plummeted, the state is 4 billion in the red, and it seems that everyone has to tighten their belts but the school administrators. These bureaucratic fat cats continue to loosen their belts. Nothing in this spending plan is right for this community. Send it back. Vote no "
DD wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:08 PM:
puzzled1 wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:06 PM:
karl L wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:01 PM:
Just because "the State" is ponying up for the extra $200 bucks, do you think we're all getting that out of thin air? Ya think they have a money tree somewhere?
Who the hell cares if "the State" is "paying" 80%! That's OUR TAX MONEY! When do they start applying some sense of fiscal responsibility and frugality to the way they spend OUR tax dollars?!?!
YOur argument doesn't hold water! "
Yikes wrote on Jan 19, 2008 12:41 PM:
Let's use the figures Jerry provided below and examine the true cost to the district after 80% funding by NYS.
Doorknobs - 250 x $250.00 per doorknob minus 80% State Funding = $50.00 per doorknob.
Painting Lockers - $125.00 per locker minus 80% State Funding = $25.00 per locker.
Classroom Tech Equipment - $6,300.00 per classroom minus 80% State Funding = $1,260.00 per classroom.
Given the "true" cost to district taxpayers, I think it's very reasonable. If the plan gets turned down, I'm quite certain other districts would love to have the state funding to improve their schools.
"
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jan 19, 2008 11:36 AM:
I don't live in the city, but I would sure be asking a lot of questions of whomever was in charge of getting estimates for these school repair plans. Where's the competitive bidding? I used to work for a private not-for-profit who gave bids to the buddies of the top administrator no matter what they charged, (being private there was no oversight and hence no going out for bids at all) -- so I know this kind of thing goes on. I'd love to see the school district respond to the generous offers of Two Cents posters here -- volunteers to do painting or contractors with much lower bids. How do they justify their absurdly high estimates? Sounds like the US Military.... "
Andy B wrote on Jan 19, 2008 11:22 AM:
nature lover wrote on Jan 19, 2008 10:53 AM:
hmmmm wrote on Jan 19, 2008 10:32 AM:
forrest wrote on Jan 19, 2008 8:45 AM:
melinda@neal.us wrote on Jan 19, 2008 8:44 AM:
me wrote on Jan 18, 2008 11:22 PM:
karl L wrote on Jan 18, 2008 11:01 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Jan 18, 2008 10:29 PM:
Then they want to put a LCD projector with a screen, and stereo speakers, and a smart board and a camera, with wiring and power source in every single class room in the district, there are 31 class rooms at Genesee, 38 at Casey, 36 at Herman, 33 at Owasco, 39 at Seward, 49 at East, 46 at West and 97 at the High school for a total of 369 class room, at $6,300 per class room for a grand total of 2.3 million dollars
Then they plan to paint all the children's lockers at Seward and Genesee Schools at $125.00 each
This whole spending plan is rife with waste. They have no trouble in authorizing the spending of multi millions of dollars year after year.
12 Million last year and now JD Pabis wants to spend an additional 15 million dollars this year. Yet, we still have schools that are on the States failure list, we have a high drop out rate, and we have the highest paid Superintendent in the history of the district. What we need are teachers! We need the teachers if we are ever going to get this district back on track, spending millions on TURF and Projectors, and gold plated doorknobs will do nothing to improve the educational standards we want and expect. VOTE NO! "
cm wrote on Jan 18, 2008 10:09 PM: