I am opposed to any proposed changes that are specific to any breed of dog. Placing restrictions on specific breeds of dogs does little, if anything, to protect citizens and perpetuates the myth that certain breeds are inherently bad. It also indemnifies all of the unnamed breeds as being safe by exclusion.
Placing restrictions on specific breeds of dogs does not address the real issue, which is that of irresponsible owners. Only when such owners are held accountable for the actions of their dogs will adverse dog incidents abate. Only when you see more owners committed to providing the proper training, care, socialization and supervision for their dogs will dog bite incidents be reduced significantly.
Legislation that targets specific breeds of dogs is ineffective, costly to the community and a poor alternative to a dangerous dog ordinance which would encompass all breeds and place irresponsible owners accountable for their dog's actions. It is the lack of enforcing laws/ordinances that are already in place that is a large part of the problem, not any specific breed of dog.
According to the Center for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association there is no individual breed of dog that is responsible for a greater number of bites. In fact, both respected organizations support responsible dog ownership as the key factor in reducing bite statistics.
Listen to responsible dog owners and well known, major organizations such as the American Kennel Club, the American Veterinary Medical Association, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the National Animal Control Association and the American Canine Foundation which do not support legislation that targets any specific breed of dog.
Temperament and aggressiveness in dogs are traits that are far more strongly influenced by environment than genetics. Enact a law that emphasizes responsible ownership and your constituents will be glad you did.
Before deciding for any breed specific legislation, read about some recent cases addressing breed specific laws.
Jami Elleman
Auburn
Legislation that targets specific breeds of dogs is ineffective, costly to the community and a poor alternative to a dangerous dog ordinance which would encompass all breeds and place irresponsible owners accountable for their dog's actions. It is the lack of enforcing laws/ordinances that are already in place that is a large part of the problem, not any specific breed of dog.
According to the Center for Disease Control and the American Veterinary Medical Association there is no individual breed of dog that is responsible for a greater number of bites. In fact, both respected organizations support responsible dog ownership as the key factor in reducing bite statistics.
Listen to responsible dog owners and well known, major organizations such as the American Kennel Club, the American Veterinary Medical Association, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, the National Animal Control Association and the American Canine Foundation which do not support legislation that targets any specific breed of dog.
Temperament and aggressiveness in dogs are traits that are far more strongly influenced by environment than genetics. Enact a law that emphasizes responsible ownership and your constituents will be glad you did.
Before deciding for any breed specific legislation, read about some recent cases addressing breed specific laws.
Jami Elleman
Auburn
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 2 comment(s)
jayjayelleman wrote on Jan 1, 2008 11:51 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Jan 1, 2008 1:33 AM: