So apparently the “Serenity Prayer” is being said at council meetings? For the record, I think that the ACLU must have bigger fish to fry - this is a tempest in a teapot. It is within court rulings that non-sectarian, non-denominational prayers which invoke a “Higher Power” are legal, and within the boundaries of what the founding fathers would have wished. In this, I concur, and the “wisdom to know what to try to change” here is a fitting admonition or desire. It is when prayers invoke specific deities “Jesus, Allah, Buddha, etc.” that they cross the line into constituting a state endorsement of religion, and run the risk of alienating other creeds. The founders were very careful not to cross this line with their deliberately chosen wording.
The one thing about this whole affair that truly saddens me is Richmond Parker#'s back-handed attempt at linking any defender of the “Separation Clause” with Communism by citing an obscure fact about Madalyn O#'Hair#'s attempt to get a visa to the USSR before her minor role in the issue of ending school prayer. As if this proves - what?
The fact is that Engel v. Vitale, which prohibited the state from sponsoring specific prayers in public schools passed in 1962 by an 8-1 vote. The plaintiffs who challenged such prayers were a mixture of believers and nonbelievers in New Hyde Park, New York. O#'Hair was not among them. Yet even before that. in 1948, McCollum v. Board of Education decided to end official religious exercises in public schools. O#'Hair's own minor role was preceded even still by Abington Township vs Shempp, the case with which hers was consolidated, This was filed by a Unitarian, Edward Shemp, challenging the requirement for his children to recite Protestant Bible verses in their public school. It was also decided 8-1 in favor of Shemp, but of course O'Hair being an Atheist, she got the infamy and blame
Karl Logan
Auburn
The fact is that Engel v. Vitale, which prohibited the state from sponsoring specific prayers in public schools passed in 1962 by an 8-1 vote. The plaintiffs who challenged such prayers were a mixture of believers and nonbelievers in New Hyde Park, New York. O#'Hair was not among them. Yet even before that. in 1948, McCollum v. Board of Education decided to end official religious exercises in public schools. O#'Hair's own minor role was preceded even still by Abington Township vs Shempp, the case with which hers was consolidated, This was filed by a Unitarian, Edward Shemp, challenging the requirement for his children to recite Protestant Bible verses in their public school. It was also decided 8-1 in favor of Shemp, but of course O'Hair being an Atheist, she got the infamy and blame
Karl Logan
Auburn
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 22 comment(s)
coach7811 wrote on Dec 19, 2007 9:08 PM:
coach7811 wrote on Dec 19, 2007 9:01 PM:
karl L wrote on Dec 19, 2007 8:26 PM:
DD wrote on Dec 19, 2007 7:31 PM:
DD wrote on Dec 19, 2007 7:28 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Dec 19, 2007 6:14 PM:
DD wrote on Dec 19, 2007 5:45 PM:
coach7811 wrote on Dec 19, 2007 4:45 PM:
karl L wrote on Dec 19, 2007 3:00 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Dec 19, 2007 2:36 PM:
karl L wrote on Dec 19, 2007 12:40 PM:
cm wrote on Dec 19, 2007 11:59 AM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Dec 19, 2007 10:53 AM:
coach7811 wrote on Dec 19, 2007 8:43 AM:
karl L wrote on Dec 19, 2007 12:11 AM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Dec 18, 2007 10:14 PM:
karl L wrote on Dec 18, 2007 8:22 PM:
karl L wrote on Dec 18, 2007 8:15 PM:
jlmorgansr wrote on Dec 18, 2007 6:50 PM:
coach7811 wrote on Dec 18, 2007 5:13 PM:
karl L wrote on Dec 18, 2007 4:40 PM:
cm wrote on Dec 18, 2007 3:49 PM: