Citizens really truckin' on traffic

By William Dugan

Monday, November 12, 2007 10:23 AM EST

Last week, I attended a large convocation regarding truck trailer use of our local highways. It was situated in the Aurora Inn, organized and chaired by George Farenthold, of Aurora, and had an unusually large attendance, compared to similar meetings I have attended in the past eight years.
I got there late because of an earlier commitment for another meeting, so I missed the first half of presentations.

What I saw was a similarity to every other anti-truck meeting I've been to in the past: a group of irate citizens, looking to ban all heavy trucking through their backyards, and a second group of elected and bureaucratic officials, with a wide disparity between the two. There was a major difference this time though: concerned and irate citizen speakers from largely dispersed geography, not just in little old Aurora/Ledyard.

There were citizen speakers from Ithaca, Trumansburg, Skaneateles and other counties as well. So now we have a major groundswell instead of just a vocal few of our locals looking to shift the burden. More on that in a little bit.

There is a plethora of reasons to divert heavy trucks to the Interstate, but all I've ever gotten in approaching bureaucracy has been deferment to Albany or the federal government at a high level. The sub rosa reasons you get for being stonewalled are simple: too much revenue generated by the highway use tax and state law guaranteeing use of the roads to trucks as well as taxpayers.

This has been an issue for at least 20 years, and other towns and areas have tried, unsuccessfully, to control truck traffic through their domain. The only winner in this contest that I know of is the town of Sparkill, and NY 5, between the Tappan Zee Bridge and the George Washington Bridge. Sparkill tried to ban trucks for years, and the only way they won, was when too many bike riders, joggers and walkers were turned into postage stamps by 18 wheelers.

I live on NY Route 90, in the village of Aurora, and it is a highway designed for minimum traffic and no parking on either side. The design goes back to the '20s through the '40s. It is so narrow, that to drive a large truck of any kind through the village of Aurora, you must put the drivers front wheel on the left of the midline painted on the road. That means that 20 or 30 tons is over in the oncoming lane.

It's a very good thing that cars are now made smaller: you can get around trucks that are wrongfully over in your lane as you approach from the opposite direction. On the other hand, if you are hit, you could look really swell glued to an envelope.

But there is now a happy ending in sight: this meeting and other efforts have made an impression on our elected officials. Sen. Michael Nozzolio has gotten a law through the state Senate requiring commercial through trucks to use the Interstates. It is in conference at the state Assembly and needs encouragement from the local level to pass.

In addition, I hear that Sen. Chuck Schumer has taken the issue to the federal government.

So stay tuned for the results of their efforts, which will be determined by the huge lobbies on the opposing side.

George Farenthold and other outspoken villagers have long been proponents of this issue, but Farenthold, in his quiet, firm way, organized and managed a very effective and successful meeting. We owe Farenthold, especially, and all the other activists in this cause, a debt of gratitude.

William Dugan is former supervisor for the town of Ledyard.

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 2 comment(s)

brew1234 wrote on Nov 13, 2007 1:17 AM:

" The Thruway increasing tolls will only make a worse situation. Why are the tolls going up when they are higher than surrounding states? Why not improve the roads so they can handle the traffic? You talk about roads designed in the 40s and 50s. It is a crime that these roads haven't been improved in 60 years. You will never eliminate trucks when they pay use tax to ride the roads. A serious look should be taken to revive the railroads to relieve the roadways. The state should redevelope the railbeds and charge rail lines a use tax just like they charge trucks for the highways. The savings in fuel costs, road repairs and safety will pay dividends in the future. "

Dan W wrote on Nov 12, 2007 6:54 PM:

" What is the plan to stop salt hauling trucks from Cargill. From Lansing to the Thruway via State Rt 90. That the highway recives federal funds to maintain it? Good luck stopping the truck traffic. The trash haulers maybe. If you can get NYC to pay extra for the Thruway tolls and fuel costs. To stay on 81 and take the Thruway. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!