Perhaps the most important vote

By Guy Cosentino

Friday, November 2, 2007 10:26 AM EDT

Not once was a question asked in any of the televised forums or those held at the Holiday Inn on one item on Tuesday's ballot. Yet, it may be the most important vote that Auburnians cast. Above all the candidates, is a referendum to allow the city to eliminate Auburn's Civil Service Commission. For a variety of reasons voters should cast a “yes” vote for Proposition 2.
There will likely be some misinformation generated in the closing days of this year's election cycle on this proposition (one recent ad in this newspaper already distorted the issue with false innuendo). The fact is that eliminating the Auburn Civil Service Commission will not eliminate civil service protections for the city's workforce. Secondly, it does not mean that civil service exams will be eliminated. Tests will still be given.

On the flipside, there is no need to have two politically appointed and paid civil service commissions in Cayuga County - one at city hall and one at the County Office Building. A “yes” vote on the proposition will save Auburn taxpayers, both those who live in the city and larger Auburn School District, the cost of the commissioners. Under the law, the county will have to do for free the work the city now does for the Auburn School District for a fee.

In much of its recent history, the Auburn Civil Service Commission has been a tool for the political machinations of others - defenders of the system will criticize city managers, current and past, for wanting to streamline operations - or more bluntly - not bend to the whims of those who want to keep the status quo - on occasion moving the city backward.

Want one small example? In an era where we talk about making sure that we get the best employees possible, commissioners “dumbed down” the requirements of one entry-level job, removing a basic two-year degree requirement for a job that had been in place for years and again rejecting a request in 2004, by a different city manager and police chief, who also pleaded to have it put back in.

More recently, the commission again blocked the hiring of lateral transfers, veterans from this community, that would have cut down on costly overtime to the tune of $70,000.

One final reason to vote “yes.” This is one of those rare times when voters can do what political leaders have failed to do - act on consolidation. For years we have heard about the idea of consolidating services - this is the first time in recent memory where it might actually happen. A failure to approve this proposition, that has great merit, will likely doom other local efforts for years.

Cosentino, a former mayor of Auburn, can be contacted at cozguytho@aol.com

The Citizens' Say

There are 2 comment(s)

silentriver wrote on Nov 3, 2007 2:54 AM:

" Vote No! The Palseh/Smith illusion of modernizing City Hall through eliminating the Civil Service Commission is a subtrafuge for returning to the days of nepotism and political favorites. The three man Civil Service Commission made up of individuals from all political parties serves as an independent system of checks and balances to assure quality, fairness and equity in the City Hiring process. Total current cost to the City budget with the school district chipping in half is $39,000 including the salaries of the Commissioners. Hiring a personnel director with benefits plus support personnell will exceed well over $100,000! How is that saving the City money? Without the Commission one person, Mr. Palesh, who hires the proposed personnel director, is now in control. When Mr. Palesh or his cronies (Lattimore, Smith & Graney) want a political favor, friend or relative hired who scored lower on the list of eligible candidates, the new personnel director better say "yes boss" or else.... "

City/County taxpayer wrote on Nov 2, 2007 5:42 PM:

" The Voters should vote "no" on Proposition 2. Mr. Cosentino fails to mention the true reason behind the City Council's efforts to abolish the Civil Service Commission. The real reason is because Palesh and Lattimore want to have complete control over the hiring process; hiring whomever THEY want (i.e. friends, family, political supporters). There won't be any equal employment opportunity with this bunch! How does this equate to "modernization" of the civil service process? Civil Service Commission continues to follow employment laws set forth by the state. This commission works independently from the city manager and council, hiring individuals who score well through written examinations. This process has nothing to do with political affiliations. Palesh and Council's attempt to save money fails miserably in this sense as they conveniently don't tell taxpayers that their "new and streamlined" Human Rescources Director and support staff will cost the taxpayers over a $100,000 in salary and benefits ($70,000/Director and at least $40,000 for EACH of the two support clerks!) This is a larger budget expense to the taxpayers in contrast to what the existing Civil Service Commission costs. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

Multimedia

Slideshows

Slideshows

Local Video

Citizen Videos

Your Photos

Photos

Top Homes

The position is required for AdSys ads.

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2008
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!