Now is the right time to again ask: Why?
€ Why is common sense garroted when a judge rules retroactively in the Indians' favor, based solely on the Non-intercourse Act of 1790?
€ Why do the treaties with New York state in 1789, 1795 and 1807 all have the signatures of responsible tribal leaders?
€ Why did tribal representatives over a 180-year period, continually petition for and generally receive financial redress, with full knowledge that the treaties were not congressionally ratified?
€ Why weren't reparations leveled against the Indian Nation (so-called) after losing two wars fought against the U.S.?
€ Why is it not obligatory that the census of tribal members prove that they are in fact Indians?
€ Why is the fact that all tribal lands sold to New York state by tribal members as “willing setters” be annulled by a judicial caveat?
€ Why is there a nation within a nation when it is not recognized by the U.S. Constitution?
€ Why does the ACLU handbook “Rights of Indians and Tribes” attest that Congress (Title 25 U.S. code, section 71) “Declares that Indian tribes are no longer sovereign nations,” in 1871?
€ Why do the majority of Indians (nationally) live off the reservation in a more competitive environment?
€ Why does the federal government continually shade their decisions espousing principals, when too often the decision is the result of political guilt or naivete?
Donald M. O'Brien
Aurora
€ Why do the treaties with New York state in 1789, 1795 and 1807 all have the signatures of responsible tribal leaders?
€ Why did tribal representatives over a 180-year period, continually petition for and generally receive financial redress, with full knowledge that the treaties were not congressionally ratified?
€ Why weren't reparations leveled against the Indian Nation (so-called) after losing two wars fought against the U.S.?
€ Why is it not obligatory that the census of tribal members prove that they are in fact Indians?
€ Why is the fact that all tribal lands sold to New York state by tribal members as “willing setters” be annulled by a judicial caveat?
€ Why is there a nation within a nation when it is not recognized by the U.S. Constitution?
€ Why does the ACLU handbook “Rights of Indians and Tribes” attest that Congress (Title 25 U.S. code, section 71) “Declares that Indian tribes are no longer sovereign nations,” in 1871?
€ Why do the majority of Indians (nationally) live off the reservation in a more competitive environment?
€ Why does the federal government continually shade their decisions espousing principals, when too often the decision is the result of political guilt or naivete?
Donald M. O'Brien
Aurora
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 7 comment(s)
brew1234 wrote on Aug 30, 2007 12:08 PM:
cm wrote on Aug 30, 2007 8:43 AM:
brew1234 wrote on Aug 30, 2007 1:18 AM:
Dan W wrote on Aug 29, 2007 6:00 PM:
RWT wrote on Aug 29, 2007 4:05 PM:
cm wrote on Aug 29, 2007 1:42 PM:
brew1234 wrote on Aug 29, 2007 11:57 AM: