The other Reagan Doctrine: Keep the lid on

By Michael Reagan

Friday, August 10, 2007 11:37 PM EDT

I got thinking about something my dad, Ronald Reagan, wrote about in his book “An American Life” about the importance of sometimes keeping secrets from Congress.
He recalled certain things he refused to reveal to members of Congress and explained why he would not take them into his confidence.

For example, he recalled that he would not share with Congress the fact that he was about to go into Grenada to prevent a Communist takeover of that island and to rescue endangered American students there.

He would not share with Congress the fact that he was about to order a fly-by over Khadafy's Libya, and take out one or two of his homes in the process.

He wouldn't share with Congress that he was ordering Ed Meese to shoot down Libyan planes if they locked on to our fighter planes with their missiles. He said if our pilots believed they were locked-on they should not hesitate to shoot them down. And they did.

In his book he explained that he didn't reveal these things because he feared that members of Congress would leak information to the media to try to stop him from carrying out those plans to protect our national security which they opposed.

He knew that such leaks could cause people to lose their lives and be very detrimental to the United States. So he kept his mouth shut.

What got me thinking about this was an article in The Washington Times last week that revealed that the Bush administration was devising a plan to stave off the very serious possibility of a Turkish invasion and military action in northern Iraq.

The story claimed that U.S. Special Forces would work with the Turkish military to locate and capture leaders of a Kurdish rebel group, the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK).

Covert action, classified planning, and the utmost secrecy were required if the plan was to succeed in preventing an explosive situation to develop in northern Iraq, which up to now has been the most peaceful area of that troubled country.

An invasion by Turkey would upset that apple cart.

It was vital that the plan be kept confidential, and members of Congress were told that fact during Congressional briefings, but unconcerned Capitol Hill blabbermouths chucked security into the trash can when one or more members of Congress present at briefings - conducted in secrecy by Undersecretary of Defense Eric Edelman - leaked the information to columnist Robert Novak, who published it in his column.

The result: the interests of the United State were undermined and the chance of success of a program vital to the United States was scuttled.

Here we go again with members of Congress.

They leaked information either because they disagree with a policy or are just excited over being able to show how important they are in having access to classified information they can leak to the media.

It doesn't bother them that the leaks prevented something vital to our national security from happening. In this case, the plan no longer has any chance of success because, thanks to the leakers, everyone knows about it.

These members of Congress who can't or won't keep a secret need to be held accountable, but they won't because the one piece of information they won't leak is who they are.

These leakers could kill us all someday.

It's a good thing there were no politicians or reporters around when George Washington crossed the Delaware. If they had been the Hessians would have been waiting for them on the other side.

My dad had the right idea: Don't ask, don't tell. Just go ahead and do the right thing and keep quiet about it until it's done.

Mike Reagan, the eldest son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is heard on more than 200 talk radio stations nationally as part of the Radio America Network. He can be

contacted at Reagan@caglecartoons.com

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 11 comment(s)

karl L wrote on Aug 11, 2007 6:23 PM:

" DD, I will never understand this "feelings" canard that you unfeeling Conservatives constantly throw around; I mean, it's as silly and erroneous as your obsession with communism! Bottom line is, a "feeling" person is a "thinking" person, a person with a brain that can and does think for themselves--not some follow-the-leader automaton, willing to follow their Pied Piper over the cliff in the name of "Patriotism". I think its awfully patronizing of you to say that the American people can wrap their arms around a subject enough to be informed of foreign policy decisions in which OUR YOUNG PEOPLE ARE SENT TO DIE FOR! If these stupid control-freak, authoritarian-minded politicians would just LEARN to feel, to talk, to communicate and recognize the horrendous consequences of their machismo decisions, the world would be a better place! "

AJ wrote on Aug 11, 2007 5:17 PM:

" DD, my point is that most of what is done under the rubric of "National Security" is found to be based on fraud. History is replete with examples of such adventures, and we need to be careful about accepting what our leaders say. More often than not, the reasons they give for their actions are lies. If the truth were known by the majority of Americans, they would not tolerate this deceit. Our list of illegal foreign entanglements is a long one, and nearly every one of them was defended as an altruistic battle against good and evil. "

DD wrote on Aug 11, 2007 4:54 PM:

" AJ--my point had little to do with the specifics in the letter by Mike. You and Karl attacked Reagan on many other fronts, the letter aside. My point is that the President/government cannot always ask for permission to move on situations due to national security interests. Our interests may range from the safety of our soldiers, to safety of American citizens abroad. Many times it (the situation) is too big for the American public to wrap its arms around. The politicians are similar to the American public in that they are not able to grasp every angle simultaneously. If they have an opinion about something such as our service people being on foreign soil, they are certain to not listen to the logical side of the argument, and inflict the situation with their "feelings." Folks, there is no room for feelings when you are speaking of policy, or procedure. The liberals are famous for injecting theier emotions instead of logic into their actions. Are Karl and AJ insisting that the government should consult the American public prior to acting on an issue every time? "

AJ wrote on Aug 11, 2007 2:27 PM:

" DD, I cannot think of a single instance cited by Mike Reagan that had anything to do with the US' legitmate national security interests. Corporate interests yes, but not our national interests. Americans must wake up to the fact that our foreign policies are based on lies. This should be so obvious as it has been shown time after time after time. "

karl L wrote on Aug 11, 2007 1:55 PM:

" DD, points conceded about Kuwait and Reagan's decisions maybe not being his alone. In fact nearly all the Scumbag warmongers who festered in Reagan's administration and the CIA at the time are, or were, part of THIS bush's administration--the Killers, the "Crazies" as they were referred to even in the Intelligence community (Cheney being amongst the worst of 'em!)the Warmongerers...What really pi$$es me off is the blatant revisionism of this idiot, the hypocrisy, the white-washing of Reagan's presidency--which was one of the worst in history, plunging America into a recession and nearly as full of fools as this current one! "

dirtysanchez wrote on Aug 11, 2007 1:50 PM:

" I think AJ and Karl are one in the same, or just two guys so in love with each other's opinion that they agree on everything. "

AJ wrote on Aug 11, 2007 1:23 PM:

" Almost forgot. Thanks for bringing up Amy Goodman Karl. As a very competent, thorough, and respected journalist, she deserves more time in the Citizen. Maybe she isn't liberal enough for the Citizen though. We all know just how liberal the media is right? "

DD wrote on Aug 11, 2007 1:22 PM:

" Karl: First off, I agree with you that there must be equal consideration when publishing letters. While I agree with some points you have, wouldn't you agree that there are far too many things going on in any Republican or Democratic office for us to totally understand? We cannot possibly comprehend the goings on in the big picture. I am sure that Reagan had good intentions with many of his decisions. I am sure that many of the decisions made were not even his, but made out to be his so that the American public would not question it. For instance, my father who served in Vietnam, admits he was in Cambodia (amoung other places). They were following orders handed down by the US intelligence. While I am sure that the presidency had "some" knowledge of US troops acting in areas outside acceptable boundaries, they had no direct knowledge, or were not handing down directives. For you to criticize the most powerful man in the world (at that time)for a few of the thousands of national security decisions is ridiculous. It is ok to keep some things quiet for the interest of security. Do you remember when our Marines landed in Kuwait? Who was waiting on the beach to snap some pictures? Because we asked permission to send our men in, someone leaked the info, and the reporters beat our Marines and Navy seals to their landing poiint on the beach. Scarry how little your point of view is. The President should not always have to ask permission to do his job----Keeping our interests safe anywhere in this world. "

AJ wrote on Aug 11, 2007 1:17 PM:

" This Mike Reagan is really a great example of why more abortions are needed. None of the incidents he cited should have been allowed to happen in the first place, and probably wouldn't have been, had anyone known about them beforehand. Grenada? Give me a break. It's pretty well known that this was little more than a diversion of the public's mind from the boming of the barracks in the mideast. There was no threat whatsoever. Karl, you have brought up many fine examples of the bs Reagan and his administration was engaged in. Things aren't much different now though, except that now that Communism is effectively dead, they have to use "terrorism" as the enemy. Aside from the fact you can't have a war against a tactic, these new wars are every bit as bogus as those by the Reagan administration. "

karl L wrote on Aug 11, 2007 11:12 AM:

" Oh, and by the way...why is it that this delusional scumbag can be found here in the "Letters" section whenever he appears, but the intelligent, articulate "left" writer Amy Goodman is conspicuously absent and impossible to find when her column graces the paper?!?! BIAS???!!! "

karl L wrote on Aug 11, 2007 10:13 AM:

" Oh, uh...yeah Mike, and you forgot to mention how he wouldn't share with Congress how he and his fellow loony-bin criminals in the CIA (including George H.W. Bush) made the decision to IGNORE US LAW by ignoring the Boland Amendment, which forbid US Military assistance to the Nicaraguan Contra Rebels. Oh yeah-and he wouldn't share with the Congress that he authorized the diversion of profits of ILLEGAL ARMS SALES TO IRAN to fund the Contras. Dito that for the fact that then-Vice-President George H.W. Bush was overseeing a secret operation in cooperation with the CIA to help the Contras raise money for their operations by using CIA operatives to assist in TRAFFICKING COCAINE INTO THE UNITED STATES! All this was in an effort to topple the Leftist government of Nicaragua; a government which had been DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED!!! THe Contas were a bunch of thugs, repeatedly burning villages, murdering their countrymen, and raping women and children. HOW DARE YOU WRITE "MY Dad had the right idea; don't ask, don't tell. Just go ahead and do the right thing and keep quite about it until it's done" YOU PIG! YOU HYPOCRITE! YOU REVISIONIST CONSERVATIVE SCUUUMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!! "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!