Jerry L Morgan, Sr. (July 31), are you calling a man who served the city of Auburn as a firefighter, for how many years, a coward? Have you ever been affiliated with a union or are you just “demonstrating an adolescent mentality?”
First of all, from what I've read in The Citizen, the union and your “City Fathers” negotiated the contract.
Chief Quill had no say in this matter; he only had to follow the by-laws of the contract. According to the agreement, there had to be so many firefighters on duty at any given time.
Because of illnesses and injuries, some firefighters were out for an extended period, leaving the city “unprotected” and therefore violated the agreement between the city and the firefighters. He had no choice but to authorized overtime.
He actually tried to add more positions to alleviate the overtime, but the city “Dads” said no and continued to complain about the overtime.
They finally agreed to the new positions after Chief Quill retired, and surprise, they were back on track with their budget.
The mayor and the remaining council members were the ones that approved the contract. Didn't they know the “ramifications?”
Secondly, if he did resign, as you say, because of “managerial difficulties,” who could blame him?
Playing politics may not be in his blood. But, maybe that's what the city needs to get its feet back on the ground, an honest, hardworking individual.
Lastly, just for your information, I am not a firefighter, or even a city resident for that matter.
I just think you should state all the facts instead of construing them to fit your own political agenda.
Lynn Proulx
Fleming
Chief Quill had no say in this matter; he only had to follow the by-laws of the contract. According to the agreement, there had to be so many firefighters on duty at any given time.
Because of illnesses and injuries, some firefighters were out for an extended period, leaving the city “unprotected” and therefore violated the agreement between the city and the firefighters. He had no choice but to authorized overtime.
He actually tried to add more positions to alleviate the overtime, but the city “Dads” said no and continued to complain about the overtime.
They finally agreed to the new positions after Chief Quill retired, and surprise, they were back on track with their budget.
The mayor and the remaining council members were the ones that approved the contract. Didn't they know the “ramifications?”
Secondly, if he did resign, as you say, because of “managerial difficulties,” who could blame him?
Playing politics may not be in his blood. But, maybe that's what the city needs to get its feet back on the ground, an honest, hardworking individual.
Lastly, just for your information, I am not a firefighter, or even a city resident for that matter.
I just think you should state all the facts instead of construing them to fit your own political agenda.
Lynn Proulx
Fleming




The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 1 comment(s)
jlmorgansr wrote on Aug 5, 2007 8:10 AM: