Post office plan to change

By Shane M. Liebler / The Citizen

Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:21 AM EDT

A plan to move the Aurora post office to the Heary Building is on hold as village officials determine the next step without Wells College.
The U.S. Postal Service has planned for more than three years to move out of a village-owned building at 373 Main St. and into its historic home next door.

The Heary Building, 371 Main St., is owned by the Aurora Foundation, a partnership of the college and alumna Pleasant Rowland. However, the college stated in a recent letter to the postal service it would look at other tenants for the Heary Building space, USPS spokeswoman Maureen Marion said Wednesday.

“We read this letter as kind of saying the Heary Building is off the table,” she said.

The foundation had offered to pay for renovations to the Heary Building and demolition of the current post office, which was built about 50 years ago, to make room for parking in the crowded village center. In exchange, the village would receive access to about 1,000 feet of Cayuga lakefront property owned by the college.

Now, the postal service needs a lease extension or another plan for relocation possibly outside the center of the village.

“We're waiting for guidance or a conversation with the village,” Marion said. “If we need to go in a completely different direction, it could take two years.”

The postal service's lease with the village ends in March 2009, adding urgency to the situation.

Village Mayor Thomas Gunderson said the collapse of the plan is unfortunate, but not a total surprise. Part of the deal included a June 1 deadline for renovation to be under way for the post office in the Heary Building.

It puts the village in a difficult position, he said. Extending the lease would also mean some village investment in the current post office property and allowing it to expire could drive the post office to the outskirts of the village.

“Most people want to see the post office remain in the middle of the village,” Gunderson said. “But, I'm personally having a real problem because I do not believe the village should be in the real estate business, owning property and renting it out.

“The short term is that if in fact some negotiations can't happen then we're going to have to face spending money on that building,” he said.

The village Board of Trustees has not discussed the recent developments in detail yet.

“I'm not faulting anyone, but it's too bad that it didn't occur,” Gunderson said. “You try to keep hope that maybe somehow someone would get back together to negotiate.

“This thing had the potential to do so much good,” he said.

College officials could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Staff writer Shane Liebler can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 248 or shane.liebler@lee.net

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 6 comment(s)

Aurora Resident wrote on Jun 10, 2007 11:25 AM:

" Welcome to Aurora, the Village where decisions are made in secrecy by the Village Board and only the loud have a voice. Voices of reason are not heard and do not receive a response. The new Post Office location had very good handicap access in the rear and the building was renovated with Post Office space in mind. Income to the Village could have been retained in the deal made with the Foundation. The Village Board just cannot make a decision when it matters. Mrs. Rowland also had to ask for monies given for the renovation of the Patrick Tavern because the Board did not move on that project either. "

Taxpayer wrote on Jun 4, 2007 6:38 PM:

" There’s so much misinformation in this article one hardly knows where to begin -- but let's make a start. Rowland's P.O. relocation proposal would NOT create new parking; it will only restore some of the parking lost in her development. (Her construction of new delivery drives and her moving of a building ate up parking spaces.) The Heary Building was built as a school, and the post office has had many Aurora locations. Therefore the Heary Building is NOT "the historic home" of the USPS. There was NOT a June 1st deadline accepted by the Village Board or the USPS; that was just another ultimatum from Pleasant Rowland. The USPS only accepted the Heary Building as a possible location in November 2006; therefore the USPS did NOT plan for three years to move into the Heary Building. There -- that's covers some of the reporter's errors, but doesn't even begin to address Gunderson's misrepresentations. PLEASE NOTE - the USPS wrote Mayor Gunderson on May 9 and asked to renew the lease for the current P.O. facility. Why isn't that fact in the article? "

David Kauber wrote on Jun 4, 2007 5:30 PM:

" Gee, there is hope that the corporate take-over of the Village of Aurora by Rowland will not quite be complete. To understand what Rowland has done to this village in destroying individual businesses and the social trust which usually comes with a small village, you only need to see what Bushco has done to the general climate of this United States in making corporations and Big money rule over decency, honesty and open communications. "

Downtown Aurora is best left out of Wells and Rowland's hands wrote on May 31, 2007 7:28 PM:

" Downtown Aurora would be better if Pleasant Rowland's dollhouse-play with our buildings hadn't created a dangerous traffic disaster -- which she should have to fix, and not by taking the last tiny bit of land still belonging to the Village. Let Wells give up land on the north side of the Inn by the bank for parking and leave our Post Office alone! "

Still hope wrote on May 31, 2007 4:18 PM:

" I still hope the plan can come to be. Downtown Aurora will be the better for it. "

Hooray! wrote on May 31, 2007 1:49 PM:

" " Score one for common sense and autonomy for the people of Aurora! Why we should give up a handicap-friendly Post Office conveniently located in the center of town, which has been working well for all the customers for years, and why we should give up the only income-producing piece of property (the ONLY piece of property still) owned by the Village right in the middle of town, for a useless piece of partly inaccessible and partly flood-plain (can't build on it) land at the far edge of town never made any sense at all. Boy, that was a long, hard time coming, but what a relief. " "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!