Officials get the stamp of approval

By Guy Cosentino / The Citizen

Monday, May 21, 2007 9:57 AM EDT

If there is one underlying theme in the results of Tuesday's school board balloting, it's that the status quo is OK with voters. From the passage of the budget and secondary referendums to the re-election of two incumbents, voters in the Auburn Enlarged School District, dismissing district critics, gave their stamp of approval to Thornton Avenue.
Nearly two thirds of all the votes cast in anemic voter turnout were for incumbents Ginny Kent and Michael Stearns and newcomer Susan Scheuerman (many supporters, prior to Election Day, were touting a mantra based on the old word play of Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS) changing it to KSS - Kent, Scheuerman and Stearns). Both current board president Stearns and vice president Kent were “defenders of the faith” when it came to taking on the district's chief critic, candidate Jerry Morgan. Scheuerman had crossover appeal, agreeing with many of the policies of the district and also agreeing, at least initially, with some of the budgetary concerns raised by Morgan. The three were seen as a team, and team efforts have almost always out garnered the votes of single independent candidates in Auburn.

The biggest winner on Tuesday didn't even appear on the ballot. In part, this week's balloting was an unofficial referendum of sorts on outgoing Superintendent of Schools John Plume. He can be gratified that voters indirectly approved of the work that he has done, with the re-election of two of his chief supporters to the board. If voters were really upset at what he was doing, they would have not re-elected Kent and Stearns and also approved the budget.

Even sweeter for the superintendent was, likely, seeing his chief critic, Morgan, getting less than 39 percent of the vote. Voters seemed to invalidate his continual stinging attacks on the superintendent that started years ago over the purchase of equipment and continued most recently on turf and storage sheds.

Morgan was the only one of the six candidates to push for the defeat of the budget. Notable was the fact that almost 9 percent more votes were cast against the budget than for his candidacy. Often it is the other way around, where the candidate that resonates, generates more votes for themselves than the issue they fought against.

Supporters will tout the budget victory as validation of the administration of local schools. They should be careful making that type of argument. A sign of trouble on the horizon for the district is that while the vote may have been roughly 56 percent to 44 percent to pass the budget, a swap of just 155 votes would have defeated it.

The gap between passage and defeat seems to be closing over the years as voter turnout dwindles when it comes to budgets. Such a trend could mean trouble in the future for a district that can't generate more support for its proposed budget.

Cosentino is a former mayor of Auburn and can be contacted at cozguytho@aol.com

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 4 comment(s)

Come on Guy wrote on May 23, 2007 12:46 AM:

" was this really necessary? I think not. This School Board/Proposition vote showed everyone one thing. People in Auburn DIDN'T Turn out to VOTE. Your article should have touted VOTER APATHY in Auburn. That would have hit a few nerves. "

Bill wrote on May 18, 2007 6:30 PM:

" Give it to them Jerry! "

Bottom Line wrote on May 18, 2007 1:35 PM:

" Guess what? It was all the teachers that swung the vote. Nobody gets it? "

Jerry Morgan Sr wrote on May 18, 2007 12:59 PM:

" Some times I have to laugh at the columns written by Auburn's quasi conservative Guy Cosentino. Today's column is no exception. It's amusing though to see them put a spin on something as small as percentage points geared towards discrediting me. While at the same time using those percentage points to make themselves look like the hero. If Mr Cosentino and Rick Emanuel, and Mike Stearns Ginny Kent, and any one of the other candidates were as interested in education as they made themselves out to be the would have asked the following questions. Tell us Mr Cosentino, what was the percentage of eligible voters that stayed home? What was the percentage spending increases within the district this year alone? What was the percentage of tax hikes since John Plume took office? What was the percentage of tax hikes since Mike Stearns first took office? What was the percentage of drop outs prior to the arrival of Mr Plume? What is the percentage of drop outs for minorities prior to and after Plume's arrival? What is the percentage of drop outs for special needs children prior to and after the arrival of John Plume? What percentage of our seniors are graduating? What was the percentage of our graduation rate prior to his arrival? You seem to question my concerns for the district spending money on sheds and turf, yet, you also seem unconcerned and failed to mention that these sheds were costing the taxpayers $68,000 a piece. Not for nothing Mr Cosentino, you build homes or buy homes for that kind of money. Not Sheds. Now, throw in another million or two for other non essential items and you have just increased taxes over 6%, without addressing any educational concerns. The district would bury the frivolous spending in propositions, while claiming rising costs for fuel, insurance, and contracts, while the uninformed taxpayer will either support the measures, or stay home. Case in point, this last election. Now you tell us Mr Cosentino, do you own a home? Do you pay taxes? You got yourself a nice cushy job with the Options of Independence, and your qualifications were? Being Mayor? I also understand you have managed to land yourself another well paid position, now who Say's politics doesn't pay? I sure you are just as qualified for this new job as you were for the Options position. The next time you want to question percentages, I suggest you do your homework, because I have the answers to these questions. This is basic journalism. Simply writing a column doesn't make you a journalist, no more than being Mayor qualifies you political patronage positions. Lord knows there are enough of you self gratifying politicians scratching each other back, while sticking it to the average JOE! I wonder what that percentage point is? "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
New! Winter Traditions
Christmas Trees, Dining,
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!