Tattoo settlement gets first OK

by Kristina Martino / The Citizen

Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:15 AM EST

AUBURN - Cayuga County Judicial and Public Safety Committee members unanimously approved to settle a lawsuit between the county and six sheriff's office corrections officers that repeals a tattoo visibility rule.
On Tuesday night, members approved a settlement, including a withdrawal of the policy that will no longer restrict covering tattoos on current employees.

Former county Sheriff Rob Outhouse authorized the policy in August.

In addition to the ban being lifted, plaintiffs may receive reimbursement for their attorney fees for an amount not to exceed $3,000.

Current Sheriff David Gould said that the office will eventually create a tattoo policy for future employees.

“For now everyone at the office is grandfathered in,” Gould said.

Many deputies have inoffensive tattoos on their forearms that always were visible under department issued short-sleeved uniforms.

After a restriction was issued, the officers filed a lawsuit with a Syracuse law firm in response to the rule, claiming their First Amendment rights were violated.

In other news:

€ The 12-year legislator term-limit law discussion is continuing.

Members of the Government Operations committee on Tuesday debated the law that currently states no legislator can serve for more than 12 consecutive years.

Although no consensus was reached, some members supported Committee Chair Francis Mitchell's idea to remove the word consecutive from the law so that it clearly reads - no legislator may serve more than three terms.

Legislators have debated the term-limit law since 2005 because of the unclear way it's written.

Mitchell proposed that legislators may only be elected for three terms regardless if they were appointed as a mid-term replacement.

If a local law is eventually passed, every legislator's term limit resets, allowing them to serve an additional three terms regardless of how long they had previously served. Yet many legislators at the meeting agreed to committing to their constituents that they would continue to count their terms as they have since 1996 when the original law was created, rather than resetting their term limit.

Members will discuss the idea further next month.

Staff writer Kristina Martino can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 238 or kristina.martino@lee.net

The Citizens' Say

There are 5 comment(s)

Choose your battles again wrote on Feb 22, 2007 6:07 PM:

" You know, it doesn't even matter that Outhouse was probably right about tattoos -- I mean, I agree, they are unprofessional looking, are not a good image for law enforcement and I *personally* find them tacky -- BUT -- his way of going about it was so undiplomatic, so counterproductive, so clearly a case of bad judgement, of not understanding the dynamics of his relationship with those he was supposed to lead, that the inevitable happened -- he was voted out of office. His rigid, unbending ways took a toll on him and he got the boot for good reason. My personal interactions with the former sheriff were just the same -- no pity, no understanding for circumstances when it came to honest, law-abiding people who got into an unlucky spot through chance circumstances beyond our control -- it does not surprise me he thought he could just MAKE his employees do His Will and since he had authority, they'd just have to toe the line. That kind of thinking will only take you so far before it backfires. A good leader knows how to earn and deserve authority, not just use it to throw his weight around and try to "prove" he is the boss. Like I said before, you must choose your battles wisely and if you are the kind of person who can't see that, who ignores that to try to just force your will on others, you are not a good leader and I am sure glad you aren't doing hostage negotiations or something. I know zip about Gould, but I know Outhouse was a bad choice for the county. He may have been right about many specific issues (and wrong about others) but he had no tact, diplomacy or leadership skills. Without those, the men and women under him were not WITH him, and the public was not served safely. Tattoos were just the sign and symbol which revealed the inadequacies of the former leadership. "

Totally agree with here we go wrote on Feb 22, 2007 9:17 AM:

" Yup...BIG MISTAKE...next it will be facial piercing...then what...long hair...overgrown beards and mustaches??? It just does not look professional. I am not stating that they can't have tattoos, but they should have to cover them. "

Choose your battles wisely wrote on Feb 22, 2007 7:55 AM:

" I hate to tell you, but the majority of people do not have a tatoo. I don't care for them myself, but the former Sheriff made himself way too many enemies in his own house by trying to cram his authority down their throats. It was the wrong battle to pick, esp. because it is not all that important in the larger scheme of things. And obviously, one of the first things the new Sheriff has to do is to get all his guys (and gals) on his side. If your leader is not part of the team, the team is going to fail. Doesn't matter how good you are in other things, if you are a great administrator of money, if your policies are honest and legal and what the area needs -- if your men (and women) are not behind you, are are going to fail as a leader. And that is precisely what happened. The Bull in a China Closet approach does not work all that well against your own people. As a boss myself, I know there are times when you have to say no, you have to insist on an unpopular policy, etc -- but you have to be savvy enough to know when to be tough and when to be sympathetic and understanding; you have to pick your battles carefully, strategically, not bull-headedly. Rob Outhouse decided to make an issue of this silly thing as a showdown to show his employees who's boss -- and he lost the showdown. It was poor judgement to choose this battle, and if that poor judgement carried over into, say, negotiations with a criminal where lives were at stake, well then, I think the people of the county made the right choice electing someone else to be the Sheriff. "

CK wrote on Feb 21, 2007 9:42 PM:

" I can't understand why it was so important for Outhouse to make the tattoo rule anyways... You may notice most police departments have people with tattoos and they are not bbeing discriminated against. Now if they went and did a Mike Tyson face tattoo, I could understand them getting some ... for it, but come on. How many people these days do NOT have a tattoo? Are we going to say a worthy person cannot become a policeman and defend us because of a little ink? Ridiculous. "

here we go wrote on Feb 21, 2007 8:31 PM:

" well now that you have approved this......what will be approved next??? Employers will have to allow people to do as they please when they are an employee?? you made a BIG MISTAKE!!! One i hope you can LIVE WITH in years to come!!! "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

Multimedia

Slideshows

Slideshows

Local Video

Citizen Videos

Your Photos

Photos

Top Homes

The position is required for AdSys ads.

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2008
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us