Yes, Virginia there is global warming

By Harold Miller

Monday, February 19, 2007 9:38 AM EST

It's official.
On Dec. 27, 2006 Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne announced a proposal to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act because of the loss of its sea ice habitat due to global warming. This proposal marks the first legally binding admission by our government of the reality of global warming and opens the door for lawsuits by environmental groups to reduce greenhouse gasses in order to protect the polar bears from extinction.

After years of whistling by the graveyard of “climate change” (the government's designated term for the warming of our planet) a major government official has stepped up to the plate of reality. While most scientists agree that our globe is undergoing climate change most admit that it is being accelerated by man-made pollution.

This does not mean that the government is jumping on the bandwagon of global warming with both feet. Recently, France called for a new environmental body of industrialized nations to convene for the purpose of drafting stricter rules governing world wide pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Forty-five nations answered France's call. Notably absent were the three largest nations responsible for polluting: China, India and the United States.

Even the general public is not that concerned - yet. The Pew Research Center, which monitors public opinion, shows global warming as 20th on a list of 23 policy concerns #- below terrorism, tax cuts, crime, morality and illegal immigration.

The chief culprit for producing greenhouse gas and pollution is the burning of fossil fuel. Naturally, any program to reduce pollution must focus on the elimination of fossil fuels. Our government has been dragging its feet on this issue, but many states and private industries are taking matters into their own hands.

€ Governor Brian Schweitzer of Montana (where 8 percent of the world's coal supply resides) is on a crusade to get the coal burning industries to “clean up their act” by developing technology for the gasification and liquefaction of coal in order to sequester carbon dioxide emissions.

€ Florida's Energy Commission is stressing energy conservation and more utilization of alternative energy sources. They are also planning additional nuclear power plants and hope to have the first one on line in 2018 (at least five other nuclear power plants are on the boards nationwide at this time).

€ When President George W. Bush was governor of Texas, he mandated the utilization of alternate energy such as wind and solar generators and established minimum criteria for utilization as a percent of total energy consumption. This program continues today.

Many other entities are involved in similar programs #- too many to mention here.

New York State (mostly through its private sector) is fast becoming a center for research, development and production of alternative and renewable energy.

A $64.5 million research and development center under construction in Syracuse will address environmental energy issues.

This brings us to Auburn and Cayuga County (readers of this column undoubtedly saw this coming).

Auburn has been a center of energy conservation, alternative and renewable energy long before it became politically correct #- fifty years ago to be exact. Now we stand on the cusp of, what promises to be, the biggest industry of the 21st century.

As our local business and government leaders grapple with the problems of rejuvenating Auburn and Cayuga County and bringing jobs to our community, the best solution lies beneath our feet in the many installations of Geo-Thermal buildings in operation and under construction locally.

Is there an alternative energy technology center in our future?

Harold Miller is a businessman and Auburn native. He may be reached at hmillermod@aol.com

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 5 comment(s)

Jay D in Montana wrote on Feb 21, 2007 3:32 PM:

" We applaud our Governor's insistence on new coal plants sequestering carbon. That's one thing if you turn coal into electricity, but if you turn it into liquid fuel, half the carbon still comes out the tailpipe. The fact is that liquid coal produces more climate changing gases over the lifecycle of the fuel than fuels from petroleum, even if the most possible carbon is sequestered at the plants that make it. We need to invest in increasing the efficiency of our transportation system, and in low or no-carbon renewable fuels like biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol, if we are going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. "

Marc wrote on Feb 20, 2007 8:28 AM:

" When a scientist adds two, unfamiliar chemicals together, s/he generally does not add them together in large quantities for fear of what could happen. Caution is a good thing. Adding huge and unnatural amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere is simply wreckless. Those citing economic reasons lack the foresight that if agriculture fails, weather becomes more unstable and extreme, there will be far more economic damage. If a new industry is created that will supply renewable energy, there will be new jobs, and Americans can actually buy something that is American made (not Saudi, Venezualan, or even Chinese). Money would stay in this country. That sounds more like an economic advantage. For evidence, the natural range of atmospheric CO2, over the past 800,000 years was between 180 and 280 ppm. Today, we are at 381 ppm and this concentration is increasing 60-fold faster than the normal, maximum rate over that same time period. See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5314592.stm for further reading. Yes, no one knows what will happen, as we are in uncharted waters- but why make it worse by ignoring it? The weather is already changing- where will it be 20 years from now? Conservation is important: CFL's, composting, efficient cars, clothes lines, rakes, reel mowers, solar hot water, and now solar electricity is becoming affordable: http://www.jointhesolution.com/mplante This company is making panels available for installation, starting next year (2008), without the $40,000 financial investment. All of this technology is available, we only need to start using it. "

Leon Kapowski wrote on Feb 19, 2007 9:37 PM:

" Follow the money, and you'll see where these doomsday global warming reports are coming from. "

Frozen In Auburn wrote on Feb 19, 2007 8:15 PM:

" Global warming has been a hard sell for the past few weeks. Have you looked outside? "

Jerry Stephens wrote on Feb 19, 2007 10:10 AM:

" Some of these same "experts" were pridicting global cooling thirty years ago. Check Time, NYT, Newsweek and other periodicals and what they were claiming then. I say HOGWASH! "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
New!Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
Skaneateles NY News and Events
Best Bridal
Central NY bridal resources.
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Winter Traditions
Christmas Trees, Dining,
Logo HereOff the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
Get Moving
Auto-buying Guide
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2010
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!