Smoking stays, for now, at Emerson

by Kristina Martino / The Citizen

Thursday, February 8, 2007 9:26 AM EST

OWASCO - Gary Duckett doesn't mind people smoking in Emerson Park, although he wishes smokers didn't leave their cigarette butts on the ground.
The Cayuga County Parks and Trails director said there is just not enough security to enforce a smoking ban in the park.

Duckett and parks commissioners unanimously opposed an outright ban on smoking in Emerson Park during their meeting Wednesday night, but they also did say they would consider aspects of the proposal in the future.

“It's unanimous, we don't want to recommend doing this at this time,” Duckett said.

Anne McCarthy, Cayuga County Tobacco Free Coalition program coordinator, presented a county smoking survey to the commission in January, suggesting that the commission consider banning smoking in the park. The survey, conducted in 2006 by adult residents in the county, showed that 35.5 percent of people think smoking should be restricted in parks, McCarthy said.

Duckett said that survey results show that 30.6 percent of county adult residents smoke.

“I don't want to alienate that part of the population and make them uncomfortable coming to the park,” Duckett said.

In roughly four years, Duckett said he has never received a complaint about smoking in the park. Since the presentation to the commission last month, only one person showed support for the ban, he said.

The director explained that there is always a problem with cigarette litter, but with 135 acres of park land and one security guard, there is just not enough people to enforce the rule.

Some commissioners didn't think that one piece of property should be targeted for a ban when there are already smoking complaints at other county properties, including the County Office Building.

“I'm concerned about one parcel of the county's property getting singled out,” said Legislator Michele Sedor, D-Sennett. “It's not just Emerson Park the county oversees.”

Legislator Peter Tortorici, R-Auburn, also opposed the ban and said if it was considered a local law that it should remain separate from any existing local laws so that the public has the opportunity to weigh in on it, he said.

“You have to consider the flip-side of things,” McCarthy said Wednesday night. “How many people don't go to the park because of smoking?”

McCarthy suggested the commission at least consider creating a smoking barrier around playgrounds to prevent smoking. Smoking is already banned at school playgrounds, McCarthy said.

Duckett, a non-smoker, said the commission may consider looking at certain areas depending on public input.

“I wasn't surprised they tabled this issue but hope they come back to place a ban around playgrounds,” McCarthy said.

Staff writer Kristina Martino can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 238 or kristina.martino@lee.net

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 14 comment(s)

Non-Smoker wrote on Feb 9, 2007 8:26 AM:

" All you smoker/vets/I vote people. You sure are going to look quite fashionable in a speedo, wheezing at the beach while dragging your oxygen tank or iron-lung behind you at Emerson Park. Freedom doesn't mean you can subject others to a known cancer causing substance or leaving your butts all over the ground... "

what happened?? wrote on Feb 9, 2007 7:38 AM:

" Mr Emerson left that park in his will to the citizens and had said it was to remain FREE but no-one is complaining about that!!! "

Rick wrote on Feb 9, 2007 6:37 AM:

" I avoid all public areas where the vile can smoke. It's gross and yes, we all think less of you. You are weak. I hope the day comes when the shut down the tobacco companies. Too bad they pay our politicians all that money. My health insurance for my family is $88. per week to cover your smoking related illnesses. Yeah big deal "you smoke and you vote" hahhahaha. Smokers don't last long... "

Hey McCarthy wrote on Feb 9, 2007 12:53 AM:

" Get real..or more like get a real job. Your suggestions are plain nuts! Truthfullly, you have no right to stop people from smoking on public land. I am always considerate of anyone who is a non-smoker anywhere or anytime I am out. People who smoke have rights. You suggestions are absolutely nuts. "

Smoking or drinking? wrote on Feb 8, 2007 5:55 PM:

" Well if smokers are not allowed to smoke in public, I personaly dont feel people should be allowed to drink. I wonder...... you cant walk around the park and light up a smoke, but most mature smokers do stay away from children and avoid no smokers. But drunks urinate on the ground, talk trash and even drive around. Thats much better for the community. "

So lost wrote on Feb 8, 2007 5:50 PM:

" This is unreal, all this to stop anything we had rights to do. Its great no smoking in public, really did wonders for the buisness's in town as well. I work in a resturant and its so great to see that a friday night you can have 100-150 people eat dinner. Now because the no smoking its even better to have 15-25 people come in to eat. The smoking section just didnt cut it? Another great law the gloves to wear while making food etc. I personaly think it is a bunch of bs how that one works. You can go to a fast food place, were they can make your take your money, make your food, along with wipe there nose and still have on the same pair of gloves. It makes it so much better to go there and eat, knowing that they wear gloves and dont need to wash there hands as much except when they go to the bathroom. Just like how much money is being spent to enforce all these smoking laws. Instead invest it to help the smokers quit, charging $100 a month for a pack of gum to quit doesnt seem to realistic. "

omg !!whats next?? wrote on Feb 8, 2007 4:26 PM:

" PEOPLE PLEASE GET OVER IT!!IT SEEMS LIKE THERE TAKING ALL OF OUR RIGHTS AWAY,NEXT THING YA KNOW WE WONT BE ABLE TO SMOKE IN OUR CARS.. "

Smoke if YOU want, but don't exhale it on me. wrote on Feb 8, 2007 4:06 PM:

" Most of the time when I've been to Emerson Park, people smoking haven't been spread out in the wide open but congregated in the shade or in populated areas where children and others will be walking past. Also, cigarettes aren't just noxious, polluting, they're also another fire hazard the park has to deal with. I think there's some confusion over people's rights as individuals and their duty to their fellow man in public and in shared areas. A smoking ban in a public place doesn't mean that you are never allowed to smoke ever, but rather, that you can't smoke in a specific shared, public place. You have a right to smoke, but your right to burn a cigarette and exhale smoke stops when anyone else is around who doesn't want to breathe poison. And Vietnam War aside, because it was the winning of the Civil War that ensured access to cheap tobacco, smoking is not an individual activity if anyone else is around because others are forced to breathe it in. Therefore, it encroaches on the individual freedoms of others and is therefore in opposition to the proverbial American Way. Since it's more reasonable to ask 1/3 of the population to refrain from smoking at Emerson Park rather than asking the other 2/3 to hold their breath for the duration of their stay, I think it's perfectly fine to expect people to smoke in the parking lot or in their own vehicles instead of in the park. I agree that it's up to the individual to smoke,whether or not he or she wishes to smoke at any given time. In accordance with treating smokers like adults, if one chooses to smoke, he or she should be adult enough to face the consequences that most of the rest of the world doesn't want one to do it around them. "

Lynn wrote on Feb 8, 2007 2:22 PM:

" Anne McCarthy, do you really think smoking is the reason people have stopped going to Emerson Park??? Smoke rises, it doesn't sit stagnate while you're outside. Besides the playhouse, Emerson offers guests nothing, not even a swim, because usually the water is too contaminated. "

bystander wrote on Feb 8, 2007 1:27 PM:

" It seems as though someone is always looking for ways to cut down on attendance at the park. Firstoff the Rocketslide was removed from the playground with the excuse that it was dangerous,"after all of the years that it was there". It was probably the biggest attraction for kids that had been there. Then the " kiddie rides" were removed because the park director,at that time , thought they were "tacky". The park attendance started declining after these events.If this wasn't enough, now there are those that want to add to the attendance problem with a no smoking ban.----by the way, I am a non-smoker! "

A Smoker + a Veteran wrote on Feb 8, 2007 12:59 PM:

" Why is it that all these laws for smoking and seat belt use seem like we don't have any rights anymore in this country? I went to WAR in Viet-nam to fight for the American way and to protect our FREEDOM, seems as we have been losing our FREEDOM a little at a time. Smoking is not good for your health but it should be up to the individual if they wish to smoke, the same can be said for the seat belt law, if you choose to not wear it, you face the chances of injury or death. The helmet law for motorcycle is the same thing, if you want to wear one it should be up to you and not the government to require you to wear one. So, if you don't like the smoking in a public place, in open air, don't go, it is as simple as that. "

keep the park clean wrote on Feb 8, 2007 12:28 PM:

" what about my right to free clean air... and no people can't smoke in the wide open air because that imposes on everyone's airspace. I relate this to the issue of cleaning up after a dog in the park. How would the smokers feel about stepping in pile of dog droppings or having to smell it in the air because it wasn't disposed of by the dog owner? Hmmm something to give some thought too. We have to clean up after our dogs why not after cigarette butts. It's just the responsible thing to do if you are going to smoke. "

ah, but is blowing smoke a right? wrote on Feb 8, 2007 11:56 AM:

" If only the active smoking was the only person breathing in the smoke, public smoking would be much less of an issue. Smoking includes the inhaling and release of carninogens and other poisons into the air which other people breathe in whether or not they wish to. Your "right to smoke" is sort of like your "right to be naked" in that it's fine if you want to do it when no one else is forced to deal with it in public places. "

so much for rights wrote on Feb 8, 2007 11:27 AM:

" Now people want to enforce a smoking bam on Emerson Park. Now they're saying someone can't smoke in the wide open air. This is rediculous! As for butts, people who smoke should take enough responsibility to put them where they belong. Or bring a can to put them in. This is crazy. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!