Demise of the Lake House apartments

By Bill Dugan

Monday, November 13, 2006 9:30 AM EST

Early Thursday morning, Nov. 2, northwest wind came strongly off Cayuga Lake ... another quiet day in Aurora ... until some rather large flatbed and rollback trucks diesel down Route 90 and park across from my house on Main Street, in the hitherto quiet village.
As I'm eating breakfast at the rear of my house, I hear the distinctive clatter of a caterpillar tread, moving something off a flatbed and a few very loud thumps, as something large is dropped. I figure that I'll go to see what is happening, after I finish my cereal and newspapers.

Lo, it is a wrecking company, come to remove the Lake House apartments, so the musical chairs of the House on Stilts can come to its conclusion.

Between nine o'clock and five in the afternoon, a large dragline, equipped with a very nasty claw on the end of the boom, eats the old building, and after segregating the metals, dumps the wreckage into 12-yard rollbacks, which shuttle back and forth throughout the day. At five o'clock, there is nothing left of a two story, five apartment building except a large pile of concrete slab fragments to be removed on the next business day.

Now, the new owners of the parcel where the Lake House was located can purchase and move the House on Stilts to a new foundation.

This continues a tradition of moving houses without regard to strict zoning regulations. The house, where I live almost directly across the street (Route 90) from the House on Stilts, has a long history in the village, having been moved twice before landing on its present site. Property lines were only guesses at the last move, as the bay windows on the north side of this house overhang the property line. The Masonic Lodge, on the driveway to the Lake House, has property lines which are three feet from the foundation on all four sides, and that lack of attention to good property lines goes back to antiquity as the cornerstone was laid by Governor Dewitt Clinton.

This is the old Aurora and is typical of the thinking which continues to 2006. This makes for keeping the village charming and authentic but flies in the face of good stewardship of tax parcels and regulated development.

Since the Lake House is on a previously existing, non-conforming parcel, the only way the use can be changed is by making the parcel conform to current zoning. This is not going to happen and continues a precedent already set.

That means anyone wanting to subdivide or change a parcel in a similar situation can legally do so, under the precedent.

So, this whole move is good for present sensibilities, but poor for future judgments. Vive la difference.

William Dugan is a former supervisor for the town of Ledyard

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 10 comment(s)

Auroran Again wrote on Nov 17, 2006 1:12 PM:

" And have a good look at the www.aurorany.org photos of yesterday's Webb House Flood! CJ's moving equipment broke the storm sewer / stream culvert running through the old Lake House lot, and then the rains fell... "

Auroran wrote on Nov 14, 2006 4:29 PM:

" People posting material here copied from the Aurora Coalition's website should give the url, so people can read the material in context. Please see www.aurorany.org , in particular the Feedback and Guestbook pages, as well as the links to background information on Webb, Lake, and Lyon Houses. "

Try again wrote on Nov 14, 2006 2:23 PM:

" Thanks SIA! My similar comments to the same effect yesterday were not posted by whomever screens these posts. At the very least let's be clear that plenty of people who live in the immediate surrounding area are just as deeply concerned about the corruption, mismanagement and destruction in Aurora, but have no option to be elected. Local government and official at Wells College, all too often one and the same people, do just as they please and do not worry themselves about laws or regulation or ordinances -- that they tear things down without following correct legal procedures is not the worst of it, nor is it a surprise for anyone around here. How about the Old Mill? By the time the authorities got there to force them to stop it was too late -- they got what they wanted de facto. Same thing could happen here in a heartbeat -- local officials (Wells or Aurora) have no compunction about laws -- do it and tell them too bad, it's done afterwards. "

SIA wrote on Nov 14, 2006 2:06 PM:

" To "another local": you show a little of your bias by two remarks which need correcting. One, it will NOT take "hundreds of thousands" of dollars to restore Lyon. It may take $100k or at the very most $200k but certainly nowhere near that simply to make it liveable and presentable again. In fact my guess would be closer to the lower figure and perhaps even a good deal less. Let's not go inflating this, buying into the already prevalent myth that Lyon is too far gone for all but the richest buyer to save. Furthermore, I want to take you to task for your offhanded "amusement" over the deep frustration that many people in our village have expressed regarding the "underhanded" dealings and motives of Wells College and the Aurora authorities. It's very convenient to chuckle away and tell people, smugly, to "get yourself elected" and "talk to the trustees." It's that kind of buck-passing, ignore-the-obvious muddled thinking and sanctimonious attitude that's got us into this position in the first place. Yes, "local", it may come as a surprise to you, but sometimes local governments and businesses--even a college--are corrupt and act unethically. Whatever you may think people should DO about it, the last thing I'd EVER be is "amused" because people are tired of it and vent their frustration about it. It's not amusing to me or to anyone I know in Aurora. So please, no more of the "get yourself elected" rhetoric. Any fool who can look up and see the world around them knows what goes on in small towns and how hard it is to change encrusted and entrenched local governments. I certainly agree--we should try to change this through the electoral process. But to pretend that can just work as easily as it's said is childish thinking. Worse still, your assertion that Wells College is a "business" under no obligation to make anyone happy begs the question then: can all businesses simply do what the want? After all, they're under no obligation to make anyone happy, are they? (except their stockholders and one would assume, their customers). But no, we don't allow businesses to run rampant. Neither should we allow it of Wells College. Wells College has a responsibility to the village of Aurora and its citizens, (this is especially true of a college more than any other kind of "business") and to not recognize that fact displays an insular kind of ignorance and self-centeredness that gets communities regularly IN to trouble, not out of it. "

Gotta be said wrote on Nov 13, 2006 8:42 PM:

" Webb House was illegally moved, and hazardously and illegally allowed to sit on stilts. For THREE years, Village officials did nothing about it, never held anyone responsible, never enforced anything. What good is any law if people are allowed to ignore it with no consequences? They stuck their collective heads in the sand and pretended they saw no laws broken. Dugan is right about one thing- village officials have set bad precedents that will someday come back to bite them. "

someone else wrote on Nov 13, 2006 8:33 PM:

" Wells College re Lyon House: Malevolent neglect. They must have ulterior motives. What's behind it? "

Also from Coalition website wrote on Nov 13, 2006 8:28 PM:

" K. A. HINDENLANG, 11/12/06 AURORA [Other potential buyers] For what it's worth, several outside observers contacted the Aurora Coalition over the years asking for advice on who to contact about purchasing Lyon (or Webb) House. We have no idea if the post below is from one of these folks, but GED's story seems consistent with that of the one couple we heard back from after making our standard recommendation that they contact Wells VP&Treas Diane Hutchinson. This couple -- who sounded like experienced preservationists -- said they got "the brush off," that Hutchinsons said Lyon was not for sale and would not take their name and number in case the college changed its mind. They were terribly disappointed, and said they had "tackled houses in much worse shape" and really had hoped to save this one. "

From Aurora Coaliton website wrote on Nov 13, 2006 8:27 PM:

" Threatened with arrest for asking about the status of a property??? --------------------------------------- G DE, 11/11/06 UPSTATE NY [Sad...potential buyer spurned] My partner and I were interested in buying the Lyon House back in 2004. We had already restored another victorian home near Elmira NY and were looking for another home we could help. We were told to call the college since they recently had purchased the house. We were told that the house wasnt for sale and not to trespass on the property or we would be arrested. Here it is three years later and nothing is being done. We were told that no one would want the house because it was so badly damaged. That was a lie, although time has not been good to the once majestic house, its nothing that money and love could'nt replace. So here we are now on another NY lake in a perfectly restored home, completed in under 1 and a half years, sadly watching a truely magnificent home continue to fall, because selfish people wouldn't sell a house. Truely hard to believe. Aurora Coalition you are doing good things, keep up the hard work, whenever we talk to anybody about Aurora we make sure to let them know what you are having to deal with, it's sad to see a Historic town become a Pleasant Tourist Attraction. "

another local wrote on Nov 13, 2006 11:09 AM:

" Actually, Lyon House has been rotting away for many years--long before Wells bought it back from the private owner. Regardless, the college should do something with it, preferably sell it to someone who can afford to spend the hundreds of thousands of dollars necessary to stabilize it, and get it back on the tax rolls. It does need to be saved, and soon. As a side note...I'm endlessly amused by people ascribing underhanded motives to the college--and local authorities. If you don't like how your local government works, get yourself elected and change it. If you don't like how the college works, talk to the trustees. Keep in mind that Wells is a business, however, and not obligated to make anyone happy (the quality of its financial management notwithstanding). "

Local wrote on Nov 13, 2006 9:56 AM:

" No one notes that they also tore up and destroyed gorgeous generations-old rose bushes and hydrangea -- they used to be right where that big ugly yellow machine is sitting in the photo. And also, let's not forget how Wells College has stalled, refused to discuss and otherwise put off any potential buyers for the historically significant and once beautiful Lyon House, adjacent to Lake House, which the College is allowing to rot, unmended and unprotected, while cutting off its lake view, paving nearly all its yard and in every other way making it less and less desireable for purchase. You must ask yourself WHY??!? For a college perpetually strapped for cash (the few new male students have not made up for the expenses and losses from going co-ed, particularly the steep drop in alumnae giving, which was formerly what kept the place afloat), why would they not want to sell? Lyons House is the cornerstone building which got all of Aurora on the National Historic Register, the first whole community to be placed on the Register. It is built with different wood in every room and is exquisite inside -- if the college's WILFUL neglect has not now pushed it past practical saving. It was DEFINITELY in fair enough shape to save when they started their game of stalling and refusing to talk to buyers while neglecting to undertake even the most basic repairs to prevent further deterioration. It is clear they WANT Lyon House to beceome decrepit. You should be asking yourself WHY once again. And Bill, seriously, you can't be surprised that authorities in Aurora don't bother to follow sensible planning -- they have always done just as they please, even when it isn't legal -- they have gotten away with it time and again in the past and continue to do so. Living right in the middle of the Village as you do, and with your former role in local government, none of this is news to you. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
New! Election HQ
Here come the politicos
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!