Cheerleaders must perform at girls games

By The Associated Press

Monday, November 6, 2006 9:43 AM EST

SYRACUSE - Cheerleaders in a New York high school athletic conference will have to cheer at an equal number of girls and boys basketball games following a federal government investigation of a parent's complaint that girls' sports were being slighted.
While the U.S. Department of Education ruled against specific schools in the Southern Tier Athletic Conference, it could have ramifications throughout New York, said Nina Van Erk, the executive director of the New York Public High School Athletic Association.

Van Erk said she would be sending an advisory letter to all school districts in New York informing them about the determination by the education department's Office for Civil Rights, even though she had not heard of the cheerleading issue elsewhere in the state.

“The letter will encourage equality in all promotion and publicity, not just cheerleading. Boys and girls sports need to be treated equally in all regards - in any publicity, any funding, any support,” she said.

The federal Office for Civil Rights investigated 12 of the conference's 20 schools following a complaint by a parent that cheerleaders attended only boys football and basketball games, said league president Richard Stank.

The federal agency reached resolution agreements with the schools after determining they had violated Title IX guidelines by not providing equal support for both boys and girls events, said education department spokesman Jim Bradshaw. The agreements allow the school districts to rectify the situation without admitting wrongdoing, he said. Title IX is federal law that prohibits sex discrimination against students and requires equal benefits for girls and boys athletic teams, including cheerleader and band support.

“Nine out of ten times, it is not a matter of intentionality. It is a continuation of the historic ritual of the celebration of male athletes,” said Donna Lopiano, executive director of the Women's Sports Foundation, an advocacy group.

“People don't think about it until it's brought to their attention. But the law is clear,” said Lopiano, adding that Title IX cases have frequently included inequities in cheerleading for girls sports.

Stank said he expected all 20 schools in the conference would comply with the decision, which only affects regular season basketball games.

The decision doesn't affect cheerleaders at football games, which the Office of Civil Rights recognized was a unique sport with no counterpart for girls, he said.

Stank said each of the school districts will devise for itself a plan on how to comply with the agreement.

The investigations dealt with other concerns besides cheerleaders, Stank said. Separate investigations were conducted in each of the 12 school districts - Binghamton, Chenango Forks, Chenango Valley, Ithaca, Maine-Endwell, Norwich, Oneonta, Owego-Apalachin, Susquehanna Valley, Vestal, Whitney Point, and Windsor - and some had additional issues. The cheerleader problem was common to all the schools, he said.

In several instances, the agreements also required the school districts to provide “equivalent publicity and/or promotional services” for boys and girls teams.“ For example, the Vestal Central School District was cited because its booster club produced a yearly program for boys sports featuring player rosters, photos and paid advertisements, while there was nothing of equal quality for girls, Bradshaw said.

The agency will monitor all the districts it reached agreements with, Bradshaw said. If a school district does not comply, OCR can initiate administrative proceedings to suspend or terminate federal funding to the district, or refer the case to the U.S. Department of Justice for prosecution.

While the federal government's determination is “a good decision in principle,” it could have some unintended negative consequences, the executive director for the American Association of Cheerleading Coaches and Administrators cautioned.

“You have to remember these cheerleaders are also students. If the boys team plays twice a week, and the girls team plays twice a week, does that mean the cheerleaders will have to cheer at four games a week. If they have to do double-duty, I have some concerns. That's twice the opportunity for injuries,” said Jim Lord, whose Memphis, Tenn.-based educational association represents more than 50,000 cheerleading coaches from the youth level to college.

The ruling also could force school districts, many already financially strapped, to hire more coaches, or impose twice as much work on current coaches, he said.

“There's also the issue of how you implement this. Do you split the squad? Do you add more cheerleaders, which also means more expense? Do you alternate them at events and have them at only half the games?” Lord said.

The Citizens' Say

There are 8 comment(s)

Samilia wrote on Feb 19, 2007 8:31 PM:

" I think that cheerleaders should not have to cheer for girls.For me being an cheerleader I say that would be to much work for us.And sometimes they have different games different places or in the same place.Then you would have to cheer over and over..Sometimes we have to do the same cheers.And plus we have to cheer for both half-time for the girls and the boys. "

ken armstrong wrote on Dec 13, 2006 1:34 PM:

" If this is gona be the case where the girls cheerleaders have to cheer for girls basketball, shouldnt they have to cheer for both football and soccer? Why just basketball? Also I am a varsity basketball player myself, it is absurd to change this. The cheerleaders dont want to attend the girls games, and the girls basketball team dosnt want the cheerleaders cheering. So how is this a solution? Also when we play away games, we dont have that many spectators as it is, and without the cheerleaders our stands will be just as empty as the girls were, and i dont think this is gona bring spectators to the girls games anyway. This idea is rediculous, if anything we should have voted on it. Lastly this should be up to the players and the cheerleaders, after all dosnt this affect them the most? "

Kelly wrote on Dec 6, 2006 10:41 AM:

" I am a varsity cheerleader and Newark High School. and i think that it should be up to us cheerleaders if we want to cheer at girls jv and varsity basketball games... i think if new york state wants to have equal rights for girls and boys they should have an all guy cheerleading team... i dont have a personal problem against cheerleading for girls varsity basketball but some of the girls on my cheerleading squad does because they think its not fair that we cant go cheer for the guys at the away games like every year in the past even though we would be in the bleachers cheering for them as Bleacher Bums... i think it will be a fun experience to cheer at girls games because i never have done it before... thats what i think about the whole thing.. "

Cheryl Krull wrote on Dec 6, 2006 6:59 AM:

" As for the "two games a week"...this is not necessarily so, especially this year. The seasons were set long before this change was made. This week our girls would have three home games and a winter concert (unrelated). Next week perhaps only one game. What happens when games are cancelled due to severe weather and rescheduled at the same time? These problems need to be worked out. The cheerleading squad also does many community service events, and most of the team will be manning the local Red Kettle Drives this weekend as well as cheering. This is a HUGE time requirement. My main point is that this should NOT happen this school year. The schedules were set and the cheerleader's expectations when they tried out last spring were for the boys games only. Many would not have chosen to cheer for the school if they had known this to be the case. My daughters both quit jobs to cheer for the season, and my oldest, especially, who is a senior may have made other choices. If title IX insists that something be done for equality then it should at least give the schools time to work out the problem. Cheerleading for boys teams has been the norm for over 50 years. To expect a complete change over in a matter of days is ridiculous. Maybe schools will two squads or pep squads, or no squads at all, but to enforce this change after the season has already begun is unfair to the participants on the cheerleading squads. They should at least know the expectations of their participation before they agree to be part of the team. "

Cor wrote on Dec 6, 2006 12:11 AM:

" Anonymous, It works out this way. If the cheerleaders were originally doing two games a week (two boys' games), but now there are four games (two boys' and two girls') a week for them to do, then they still only do two games: one girls' game, and one boys' game. "

Cheryl Krull wrote on Dec 5, 2006 9:51 PM:

" As a former high school varsity cheerleading coach and the mother of two high school cheerleaders I feel that the suggestion of a statute such as this is totally off base. Cheerleaders today are a team in and of themselves, with many squads travelling to and attending local and national competitions. They train as hard and for as many hours as the other sports teams do and often raise their own funds. There are many club cheerleading squads available now, and this change will definitely affect the future of high school cheerleading, most likely leading to the complete elimination of the sport entireley. Why put up with such nonsense when they can cheer for a club with much less interference like this? Who benefits from this change? Neither the boy's or the girl's teams gets 100% support throughout it's season if only supported at home games. If both teams have a run at the playoffs which team gets full support? The cheerleaders are shortchanged in having to follow two to four (if you include JV's as smaller schools have only one squad) seperate sports seasons. It would be nearly impossible to cheer for both teams entire season and keep up with sleep and schoolwork! Furthermore, considering cheerleaders a "benefit" is sexist in it's own right. The amount of preparation and time put into each game is quite extensive. Teams are often required to come early and stay through both games. They are not only there to support the team and encourage the crowd, but to participate and perform themselves. There is nothing stopping schools from holding tryouts and hiring coaches for squads for their girls basketball teams. I challenge them to try and find enough interested girls to field a team. It appears to me that many of the girls on the basketball teams are not even interested in having their peers cheer for them in an organized fashion. They find it embarrassing. Finally, to enact this ruling after the season has already started is not fair to the participants of the cheerleading squads themselves, most of whom decided to try out for their respective teams far before these decisions were made. In my opinion if this decision is to be entertained at all, it should be for NEXT year's (2007-2008) season. Give the participants enough information and warning to make an educated decision BEFORE they decide if they would like to participate or not. "

G. Smith wrote on Dec 5, 2006 9:40 PM:

" People are panning this out to be discriminatory against the cheerleaders. Have you even stopped to think that maybe the cheerleaders could cheer at half the boy's games and half of the girls' games? But no, that would be the easy and just answer. You may rebut, But that's unfair to the boys! Well, it's unfair to the girls teams which get less funding and profit due to almost no spectators for their games. "

Anonymous wrote on Dec 5, 2006 11:33 AM:

" How will cheerleaders have time to cheer at both girls and boys games making more games a week, and expect them to excel in school at the same time.Not only do the girls not want to cheer at the girls games, but the girls basketball players are finding it to be absurd too.This should not be in effect for the 2006-2007 cheerleading season without having been recognized until after it began. Cheerleading should be an enjoyable sport. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

Multimedia

Slideshows

Slideshows

Local Video

Citizen Videos

Your Photos

Photos

Top Homes

The position is required for AdSys ads.

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2008
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us