Auburn kicks around turf

By Olivia Goldberg / The Citizen

Thursday, July 20, 2006 9:12 PM EDT

AUBURN - This isn't your daddy's turf. Or your mother's, for that matter.
That's what project managers at Parrone Engineering wanted school district residents to know about the proposed synthetic field project for the Auburn Enlarged City School District.

During a community listening session held Wednesday night in the Auburn High School auditorium, engineers and architects brought along samples of what they referred to as “first-generation turf,” which felt like Brillo to the touch, and the modern version they plan to install in one of two playing fields, should the public approve the project this coming fall.

One touch was all it took to persuade Pamela Anderegg, one of the few community members in attendance at the public session who did not have a vested interest in the turf project, except as a taxpayer.

Addressing a group primarily comprised of past or present district employees and school officials, Anderegg said she had initially opposed the move for synthetic turf, and had in fact come to speak out against it.

“Then I felt it. It's not half bad,” she said.

James Paul was not so swayed, driving home the point that while a synthetic turf field sounds nice, it's not necessary. After listening to Michael Montalto of Parrone deliver a five-option a la carte menu of various improvements to whichever field - at the high school or at Holland Stadium - sees artificial turf installed, he remarked on the variety of choices presented to the district.

“I don't see 'necessary,'” he said. “I see 'optional' or 'nice to have.' There's a lot of things that's nice to have, but is it really necessary,” he said. Paul also inquired as to whether a reduction in maintenance costs to synthetic turf might mean more job cuts for employees who now maintain buildings and grounds. That question went unanswered.

Anderegg and Paul were two anomalies in the last of two public feedback sessions. All others in attendance had coached, taught, administrated or otherwise sent children to schools in the district. Following a presentation that talked up the merits of synthetic turf - its consistent playing surface, durability regardless of weather, season or amount of use - most speakers debated where to install it.

Steve Crosby, a guidance counselor and the head varsity boys lacrosse coach, felt strongly that the district should take advantage of the state and BOCES aid available to include artificial turf in the overall $13 million capital project. The majority of teams in that league, he said, have gone the way of artificial turf. and pointed out the district has paid other school areas to let the Auburn team practice on synthetic turf.

“We pay for turf now, just somebody else's,” he said, pointing out that the Auburn school district would be in a position to charge other schools for use of their artificial turf, should the public approve the measure.

“This could be a money-maker,” he said. Crosby said he thought the turf should go to the high school, citing nostalgia for the history of the natural grass field at Holland Stadium. “It should be grass forever,” he said.

Public sentiment for tradition at Holland Stadium's led most speakers to favor the high school for installation.

“When we look at maximum usability it's a no-brainer. It should be here at the high school,” said Al Emmi, a former superintendent of Auburn schools. Still, he cautioned, it would be a “hard road” to sell the proposal to the public.

The school board is slated to decide by Aug. 15 how it will put the capital project proposal to voters in the fall. The major portion of the project involves replacing the roof at the high school and a variety of other projects with a different scope in size at other area schools. These include the synthetic turf field, upgrading windows to meet energy standards, as well as the heating systems in buildings.

Board members are considering whether to put the capital project to voters in one or two parts, leaving the synthetic turf field proposal separate from the rest.

Staff writer Olivia Goldberg can be reached at 253-5311 ext. 235 or olivia.goldberg@lee.net

The Citizens' Say

Post your comment - click here

There are 6 comment(s)

PK wrote on Jul 21, 2006 12:38 PM:

" Start with the basics. Pay the bills and forget the frills. This district does not have the money to "play this game". "

Don, Killeen, Tx wrote on Jul 20, 2006 5:21 PM:

" Now you are thinking right. Turf goes in only with school district thinking MARKETING YOUR ASSETS. You do not create extra INCOME, you are wasting your assets. Better use of all your facilities thru MARKETING creates income for everyone. "

Jerry Morgan wrote on Jul 20, 2006 2:32 PM:

" Lets see if I get this straight. Lets cut a teaching position and advocate for an artifical turf. Kind of backwards if you ask me. I say NO! to the turf, yes to the teacher. "

taxpayer wrote on Jul 20, 2006 1:24 PM:

" Put the turf down!!! We have the worst playing fields in central new york.. Our soccer fields are terrible and hardly ever taken care of. Also,parents should focus on their own kids education and graduation! I Support Turf!!!! "

Put it in Holland! Do the right thing (economically speaking)!! wrote on Jul 20, 2006 1:08 PM:

" The turf should be put in HOLLAND STADIUM. The location of the field is key as its near 5 & 20, which is easier for those coming into Auburn to get to the field, plus its where local restaurants and businesses are located, which could benefit from out-of-town guests who are using the field. Also, Cayuga CC can have easy access to it, which can pay the district to use the fields. And lets not forget the concession stands are located @ Holland as well. Boosters can make $$$ off various events held @ the Stadium! It would be a WASTE to put it up @ the High School. Emmi and Crosby got the right idea, but they need to think a little "outside the box" in terms of financial opportunities! "

taxpayer wrote on Jul 20, 2006 11:03 AM:

" The school(plume) and the school board should stay focused on the fewer number of students graduating, smaller enrollments and not spending money on projects ALL students don't benefit from. As for Crosby and Emmi, where were they when the school was going to receive turf free from one of the soda companies. They don't have any problems when it comes from tax dollars though. "

REGISTRATION IS FREE.
Registered users sign in here:
*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 
Unregistered users can register here:

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 
E-Citizen
E-Edition
Wheels Etc.
Find a vehicle
Hot Jobs
Find a Job
Homes Etc.
Find a Home
TV Week
Find a program
Search Classifieds
Find, Buy
Place a Classified Ad
Sell
Skaneateles Journal
The Journal
New! Best Bridal
Here comes the bride. . .
Liven Up the Holidays
Fa-la-la-la-la-la-la-laaaaaa
Logo HereNew! Off the Menu
Good Eatin'!
Newspaper Ads
See it again
CNY Boats Etc.
Achors aweigh!
New! School Project
A breakdown of the new school project.
Sections
Special Sections

Top Jobs

The Citizen Copyright ©2009
A division of Lee Publications, Inc.
25 Dill Street
Auburn, NY 13021

Contact Us

Add to My Yahoo!